See Here
Above the Judge, in reference to 1351 writes: "Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment, Master Docket No. 1351"
See Here
In the above link the defendants refer to the same document in this manner:
"In Docket No. 1351, the Court grants summary judgment at page 174 of the Order, stating that the ‘858, ‘516, and ‘517 Patents are invalid under 35 U.S.C. §102(b)’s on sale bar for the reasons stated in the Order."
When I look at 1351 all I can see is a statement that says it is sealed. So for now all I can do is show how it is referred to in these other documents.
SkunK
Monday, October 27, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
Was the Anony of Oct 25 correct; the one whose post is no longer available below? If the SJ was granted for the defense on the basis of "on sale bar", we are done. GPRE will likely withdraw from it license which it has been hedging based on this outcome. Common shareholders will not be able to keep this afloat through purchase of more shares through dilution. If Skunk's information means a SJ for the defendants -- last one out turn out he lights.
http://www.icminc.com/icm-media/whats-new-at-icm/23-press-releases/215-gs-cleantech-patents-held-not-infringed-and-invalid.html
BK?
Post a Comment