tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-56932316764918087912024-03-13T02:44:52.063-05:00GreenShift GERS - the unofficial siteI am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1771125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-34621712707938592562021-12-19T07:31:00.003-06:002021-12-19T07:31:40.196-06:00Now Known As Clean Tech Alpha<p><a href="https://cleantech-alpha.com/" target="_blank"> See here</a></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://stockinvest.us/insider-trading/LODE" target="_blank">Also see Here</a></p><p><br /></p><p><b>SkunK</b></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-39361648078745790952021-09-21T18:52:00.000-05:002021-09-21T18:52:22.387-05:00Say goodnight, Gracie<p> <span style="font-family: "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">Approximate number of holders of record as of the certification or notice date: One hundred and thirty six (136).</span></p><p><a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269127/000126246321000463/gersform15.htm" style="font-family: "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">See Here</a></p><div class="head" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Verdana, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2em; font-weight: bold;"><b style="background-color: transparent;">SkunK</b></div><p><b><br /></b></p><div class="head" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Verdana, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 1.2em; font-weight: bold;">§ 240.12g-4 Certifications of termination of registration under <a aria-label="Definitions - section" class="colorbox-load definedterm" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=173a7921097964a53368c5594b93546a&term_occur=999&term_src=Title:17:Chapter:II:Part:240:Subjgrp:83:240.12g-4" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">section</a> 12(g).</div><p class="psection-1" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Verdana, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 10px 0px;"><span class="enumxml" id="a" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bold;">(a)</span> Termination of registration of a class of securities under <a aria-label="Definitions - section" class="colorbox-load definedterm" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=173a7921097964a53368c5594b93546a&term_occur=999&term_src=Title:17:Chapter:II:Part:240:Subjgrp:83:240.12g-4" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">section</a> 12(g) of the Act (<a aria-label="uscode - 15 USC 78" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">15 U.S.C. 78</a><span class="et03" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-style: italic;">l</span>(g)) shall take effect 90 days, or such shorter period as the Commission may determine, after the <a aria-label="Definitions - issuer" class="colorbox-load definedterm" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=b9b4119395200d44b487aae01e96d953&term_occur=999&term_src=Title:17:Chapter:II:Part:240:Subjgrp:83:240.12g-4" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">issuer</a> certifies to the Commission on Form 15 (<a aria-label="cfr - 17 CFR 249.323" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/249.323" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">§ 249.323</a> of this chapter) that the class of securities is held of record by:</p><p class="psection-2" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Verdana, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 10px 1em;"><span class="enumxml" id="a_1" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bold;">(1)</span> <u><b>Fewer than 300 persons</b></u>, or in the case of a bank; a savings and loan holding company, as such term is defined in <a aria-label="Definitions - section" class="colorbox-load definedterm" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=173a7921097964a53368c5594b93546a&term_occur=999&term_src=Title:17:Chapter:II:Part:240:Subjgrp:83:240.12g-4" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">section</a> 10 of the <a aria-label="topn - home owners loan act" entid="home_owners_loan_act" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/topn/home_owners_loan_act" occur="1" src="named_acts" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">Home Owners' Loan Act</a> (<a aria-label="uscode - 12 USC 1461" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/1461" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">12 U.S.C. 1461</a>); or a bank holding company, as such term is defined in <a aria-label="Definitions - section" class="colorbox-load definedterm" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=173a7921097964a53368c5594b93546a&term_occur=999&term_src=Title:17:Chapter:II:Part:240:Subjgrp:83:240.12g-4" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">section</a> 2 of the <a aria-label="topn - bank holding company act of..." entid="bank_holding_company_act_of_1956" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/topn/bank_holding_company_act_of_1956" occur="1" src="named_acts" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">Bank Holding Company Act of 1956</a> (<a aria-label="uscode - 12 USC 1841" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/1841" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">12 U.S.C. 1841</a>), 1,200 persons; or</p><p class="psection-2" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #333333; font-family: Verdana, "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin: 0px 0px 10px 1em;"><span class="enumxml" id="a_2" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bold;">(2)</span> Fewer than 500 persons, where the total assets of the <a aria-label="Definitions - issuer" class="colorbox-load definedterm" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=b9b4119395200d44b487aae01e96d953&term_occur=999&term_src=Title:17:Chapter:II:Part:240:Subjgrp:83:240.12g-4" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">issuer</a> have not exceeded $10 million on the last day of each of the <a aria-label="Definitions - issuer" class="colorbox-load definedterm" href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=b9b4119395200d44b487aae01e96d953&term_occur=999&term_src=Title:17:Chapter:II:Part:240:Subjgrp:83:240.12g-4" style="background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 1px dotted; box-sizing: border-box; color: #0068ac; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;">issuer</a>'s most recent three fiscal years.</p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-88462855568027598782021-04-16T11:39:00.001-05:002021-04-16T11:39:09.755-05:00New Home Page<p><a href="https://greenshift.com/"> See Here</a></p><p><br /></p><p><b>SkunK</b></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-47586358896608983102021-02-28T06:58:00.002-06:002021-02-28T06:58:24.783-06:00Letter from the Office of the Clerk<p><span style="font-size: large;"> See Letter <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RAF41xjwQlGkC5gQW9h_sDyOH3CAlHQD/view?usp=sharing">Here</a></span></p><p><b><span style="font-size: large;">SkunK</span></b></p><p><br /></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-35529794909963546932021-02-22T09:58:00.009-06:002021-02-22T10:20:04.960-06:00Denied<p><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022221zor_2cp3.pdf">Here</a> </p><p>Bottom 1/3 on page 5</p><p>Link above came from <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/ordersofthecourt/20">this page</a>.</p><p><b>SkunK</b></p><p> </p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-45054143673901570142021-02-02T10:32:00.006-06:002021-02-02T10:40:51.389-06:00The Site to Watch<p></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV082gv6uTNidzpFMUJsX98kNysWBf7rnxqEK5WIzFs2HhEJOVI0Y8Xlbg_IF_CvRx9KakiEktgMYjG97Wq6qTMLx_UAE7mc5l-FyB5VFSpbk0TYLrTnnYWyrWkzKSfPk45mAdM3WtAbI/" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" data-original-height="200" data-original-width="200" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV082gv6uTNidzpFMUJsX98kNysWBf7rnxqEK5WIzFs2HhEJOVI0Y8Xlbg_IF_CvRx9KakiEktgMYjG97Wq6qTMLx_UAE7mc5l-FyB5VFSpbk0TYLrTnnYWyrWkzKSfPk45mAdM3WtAbI/" width="240" /></a></div><br />Watch for <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-769.html">Action here</a>: <p></p><p>Other . . .</p><p>MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
AND BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE
MICHAEL E. MCCABE, JR.
IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER</p><p>"Indeed, applying
a discretionary review standard, the Federal Circuit could conclude that the same reference is both material and not material as a matter of law."</p><p> "The failure to follow national norms for standards of review harms the Patent Bar by leading to inconsistent decisions on important issues of national
consequence.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, amicus respectfully
asks that the Court grant the petition for writ of certiorari to correct the standard of reviewing factual
findings of materiality and intent, as well as the
standard of reviewing summary judgment."</p><p><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-769/165224/20210104101226845_McCabe%20Amicus%20Petition%20re%20GS%20Cleantech_04Jan202_Final.pdf">See Here</a></p><table class="Basic-Table" id="proceedings" style="background-color: white; border-collapse: collapse; border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-spacing: 0px; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Verdana, serif; font-size: 12px; margin-bottom: 8px; margin-top: 8px; max-width: 100%; width: 743px;"><tbody style="box-sizing: border-box;"><tr style="box-sizing: border-box;"><td style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 8px 5px; vertical-align: top;" width="200"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">Jan 20 2021</span></td><td style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 8px 5px; vertical-align: top;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.</span></td></tr></tbody></table><p><b>SkunK</b></p>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-12857535992717845682020-12-11T07:09:00.007-06:002020-12-11T07:17:05.700-06:00Supremes<p><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OU214E_1pn_CwpS1aipQ24kk7_kNF04x/view?usp=sharing"></a></p><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOQWak-eBz4vysFXsxLtqtOaP60yXsXvWynGWFvl6hzIiD3wuNG5zk872zHMMMUhA6oN1Y-On6HmfTaax9x5I47FJ8_nRmWUsUCr04rZwV0FYegGkEzxIu278tpa3HUL93yuGXow5uaZg/s620/Supremes.jpg" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="429" data-original-width="620" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOQWak-eBz4vysFXsxLtqtOaP60yXsXvWynGWFvl6hzIiD3wuNG5zk872zHMMMUhA6oN1Y-On6HmfTaax9x5I47FJ8_nRmWUsUCr04rZwV0FYegGkEzxIu278tpa3HUL93yuGXow5uaZg/s320/Supremes.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OU214E_1pn_CwpS1aipQ24kk7_kNF04x/view?usp=sharing"> See Here</a><div><br /></div><div>Dear Clerk:
The petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case was filed on
November 27, 2020 and placed on the docket December 4, 2020 as No. 20-769. <br /><p></p><p><br /></p><p><b>SkunK</b></p></div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-352477806211172472020-07-08T07:23:00.001-05:002020-07-08T07:32:26.782-05:00Denied, Mandate Issued<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">06/30/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 180 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">ORDER filed denying [175] petition for en banc rehearing filed by GS Cleantech Corporation and Greenshift Corporation. By: En Banc (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [704540] [JAB] [Entered: 06/30/2020 09:12 AM]</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">07/07/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 181<a href="https://ecf.cafc.uscourts.gov/docs1/01301615075" title="Open Document"> </a></td><td valign="top" width="90%">Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [705851] [16-2231, 17-1832, 17-1838] [JAB] [Entered: 07/07/2020 01:21 PM]<br />
<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fo8C5O9xNC-3QX6WD8yCmiZUSVBolLdR/view?usp=sharing"><span style="font-size: small;">Order Denying Here</span></a><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Rf5phIPnMg5vnjQmkWlNKXW6RtFh0-Vd/view?usp=sharing"><span style="font-size: small;">Mandate Here</span></a><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>SkunK</b></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com15tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-21631800052265741292020-06-16T07:09:00.001-05:002020-06-16T07:09:17.516-05:00Defendants Respond to En BancIntroduction starts page 28.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y1EfdRuJISf94qXvr4M4d40srg4RGdvF/view?usp=sharing">See Here</a><br />
<br />
<b>SkunK</b><br />
<br />
<br />Unknownnoreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-869287213889717392020-05-26T19:45:00.003-05:002020-05-26T19:45:54.962-05:00Ext Approved<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">05/26/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 178 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">ORDER filed granting motion to extend time to file response to rehearing/en banc [177] filed by Appellees Big River Resources Galva, LLC, Big River Resources West Burlington, LLC, Iroquois Bio-Energy Company, LLC, Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, Lincolnway Energy, LLC, ICM, Inc., Bushmills Ethanol, Inc., Chippewa Valley Ethanol Company, LLP, ACE Ethanol, LLC, Blue Flint Ethanol LLC, United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC, Flottweg Separation Technology, Inc., David J. Vander Griend, Lincolnland Agri-Energy, LLC, Heartland Corn Products, GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc., Aemetis, Inc., Little Sioux Corn Processors, LLLP, Guardian Energy, LLC, Western New York Energy, LLC, Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC, Pacific Ethanol Magic Valley LLC, Pacific Ethanol Stockton, Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC, Pacific Ethanol, Inc., Al-Corn Clean Fuel, LLC and Adkins Energy LLC. By: Per Curiam. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [696867] [JAB] [Entered: 05/26/2020 01:16 PM]<br /><br /><b>SkunK</b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com17tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-27310387053083643202020-05-22T18:31:00.001-05:002020-05-22T18:31:22.560-05:00Ext Until 6/12/2020<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">05/21/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 177 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">MOTION of Appellees ACE Ethanol, LLC, Aemetis, Inc., Al-Corn Clean Fuel, LLC, Big River Resources Galva, LLC, Big River Resources West Burlington, LLC, Blue Flint Ethanol LLC, Bushmills Ethanol, Inc., Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, Chippewa Valley Ethanol Company, LLP, Flottweg Separation Technology, Inc., GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc., Guardian Energy, LLC, Heartland Corn Products, Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC, ICM, Inc., Iroquois Bio-Energy Company, LLC, Lincolnland Agri-Energy, LLC, Lincolnway Energy, LLC, Little Sioux Corn Processors, LLLP, Pacific Ethanol Magic Valley LLC, Pacific Ethanol Stockton, Pacific Ethanol, Inc., Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC, United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC, David J. Vander Griend, Western New York Energy, LLC and Cross-Appellant Adkins Energy LLC <b>to extend the time to file a response to the Petition for Rehearing En Banc until 06/12/2020</b> [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 05/21/2020 by email. [696247] [16-2231] [Michael Buchanan] [Entered: 05/21/2020 12:49 PM]<br /><br /><b><span style="font-size: small;">SkunK</span></b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-60903041262434353562020-05-14T19:06:00.005-05:002020-05-14T19:13:22.514-05:00The Court Invites<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">The court invites a response from Appellees ACE Ethanol, LLC, Aemetis Advanced Fuels Keyes, Inc., Aemetis, Inc., Al-Corn Clean Fuel, LLC, Big River Resources Galva, LLC, Big River Resources West Burlington, LLC, Blue Flint Ethanol LLC, Bushmills Ethanol, Inc., Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, Chippewa Valley Ethanol Company, LLP, Flottweg Separation Technology, Inc., GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc., Guardian Energy, LLC, Heartland Corn Products, Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC, ICM, Inc., Iroquois Bio-Energy Company, LLC, Lincolnland Agri-Energy, LLC, Lincolnway Energy, LLC, Little Sioux Corn Processors, LLLP, Pacific Ethanol Magic Valley LLC, Pacific Ethanol Stockton, Pacific Ethanol, Inc., Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC, United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC, David J. Vander Griend, Western New York Energy, LLC and Adkins Energy LLC to the petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellants in 16-2231. The response is due on or before 05/28/2020. [694593] [JAB] [Entered: 05/14/2020 01:42 PM]</span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CZpW_rsh7DueEnRA1yXVXu6oDi0RuNyE/view?usp=sharing">See Here</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "arial" , "helvetica" , sans-serif;"><b>SkunK</b></span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-70195046049717352102020-05-06T12:02:00.000-05:002020-05-06T12:02:10.739-05:00GreenShift Provides Update<a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/greenshift-provides-update-301053426.html">https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/greenshift-provides-update-301053426.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>SkunK</b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-50953917740662980342020-04-16T05:17:00.004-05:002020-04-16T05:17:59.290-05:00To Prevent Injustice, . .Based on my professional judgment, I believe the panel decision is contrary<br />
to the following decision(s) of the Supreme Court of the United States or the<br />
precedent(s) of this court: (i) Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc., 529 U.S. 460 (2000); (ii)<br />
Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., 649 F.3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. 2011); (iii)<br />
Plumtree Software, Inc. v. Datamize, LLC, 473 F.3d 1152 (Fed. Cir. 2006); (iv)<br />
Cross Med. Prod., Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 424 F.3d 1293 (Fed. Cir.<br />
2005); (v) TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corp., 608 F.3d 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2010); (vi) Star<br />
Sci., Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 537 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2008).<br />
<br />
III. CONCLUSION
To prevent injustice, comply with controlling authority, and avoid creating
dangerous new precedent, the panel’s decision should be reheard en banc. Upon such rehearing, the Judgment of this Court should be lifted, and this Court should enter
an order: (i) reversing the summary judgment of on-sale bar; and (ii) vacating the
finding of inequitable conduct. This Court should then review, either en banc or in
panel, the remaining issues raised in Appellants’ appeal, which the panel did not
reach. Upon such review, for the reasons stated in Appellants’ Briefs, the judgment
of the district court should be vacated, and this case should be remanded for trial.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eBNRfY16-lXnFEoTKkVnvnBkuDJdoG2t/view?usp=sharing">See Here</a><br />
<br />
<b>SkunK</b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-83667617081255236462020-04-02T07:48:00.001-05:002020-04-02T07:48:20.142-05:00Administration II<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">03/31/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 174 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE: re:attorney entry of appearance Docket No. [173], ERROR: The information listed on the Entry of Appearance for Stephen Underwood does not match the information listed on the attorney's user account. CORRECTION: Please promptly update to ensure the information with the PACER Service Center matches the Entry of Appearance. [683027] [JAB] [Entered: 03/31/2020 10:50 AM]</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<b>SkunK</b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-16139995256252939052020-03-30T07:37:00.000-05:002020-03-30T07:37:03.124-05:00Administration<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">03/26/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 173 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">Entry of appearance for Stephen Underwood as of counsel for Appellants Greenshift Corporation and GS Cleantech Corporation. Service: 03/26/2020 by email. [682050] [16-2231] [Stephen Underwood] [Entered: 03/26/2020 01:54 PM]<br /><br /><b><span style="font-size: small;">SkunK</span></b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-25010826857759217322020-03-19T17:34:00.002-05:002020-03-19T17:34:18.490-05:00National Law Review<a href="https://www.natlawreview.com/article/choosing-advocacy-over-candor-renders-patent-unenforceable">See Here</a><br />
<br />
<b>SkunK</b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-2964078149990320142020-03-19T17:20:00.003-05:002020-03-19T17:30:13.124-05:00Resubmitted Bill<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">03/19/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 171 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellees ACE Ethanol, LLC and GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc., Bill of Costs [170], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/26/2020. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [680155] [JAB] [Entered: 03/19/2020 09:59 AM]</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">03/19/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 172</td><td valign="top" width="90%">Bill of Costs for Appellees ACE Ethanol, LLC and GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc.. Service: 03/19/2020 by email. [680222] [16-2231] [Michael Buchanan] [Entered: 03/19/2020 12:42 PM]<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: small;">SkunK</span></b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-67589947639600166972020-03-17T15:58:00.002-05:002020-03-17T16:01:13.891-05:00Motion for Rehearing<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">03/16/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 166 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">MOTION of Appellants Greenshift Corporation and GS Cleantech Corporation to extend the time to file a Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc until 04/15/2020 [Consent: unopposed]. Service: 03/16/2020 by email. [679137] [16-2231] [Steven Pokotilow] [Entered: 03/16/2020 01:45 PM]</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">03/16/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 167 <img alt="Open Restricted Document" border="2" height="15" src="https://ecf.cafc.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=doclock.gif" width="13" /></td><td valign="top" width="90%">Bill of Costs for Appellees ACE Ethanol, LLC and GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc.. Service: 03/16/2020 by email. [679255] [16-2231] This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [168]. [Michael Buchanan] [Entered: 03/16/2020 04:53 PM]</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">03/17/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 168 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellees ACE Ethanol, LLC and GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc., Bill of Costs [167], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 03/24/2020. Unless ordered otherwise, the deadline for any responsive filing runs from service of the original version. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [679337] [JAB] [Entered: 03/17/2020 08:08 AM]</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">03/17/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 169 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">ORDER filed granting motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing/en banc [166] filed by Appellants GS Cleantech Corporation and Greenshift Corporation. Petition for Rehearing due on or before 04/15/2020. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [679400] [JAB] [Entered: 03/17/2020 10:07 AM]</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">03/17/2020</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 170 <img alt="Open Restricted Document" border="2" height="15" src="https://ecf.cafc.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=doclock.gif" width="13" /></td><td valign="top" width="90%">Bill of Costs for Appellees ACE Ethanol, LLC and GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc.. Service: 03/17/2020 by email. [679441] [16-2231] [Michael Buchanan] [Entered: 03/17/2020 11:40 AM]<br />
<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lLweGVUSoMLMCf5cxpe_4siyv8X5O2fj/view?usp=sharing">SEE HERE</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b>SkunK</b></span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-14554400122015777702020-03-03T08:07:00.003-06:002020-03-03T08:12:48.843-06:00AFFIRMEDCONCLUSION
We have considered the parties’ other arguments and
each of the remaining issues raised on appeal and crossappeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the
judgments below are
AFFIRMED<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iI6iHNgXg5Vma-UBlJdqdUUyzR1vFOTl/view?usp=sharing">See Here</a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y_iMTVr27vfHnPEAO8v-35HUfOcP-awS/view?usp=sharing">See Here</a><br />
<br />
<b>SkunK</b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com15tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-87841555435705178782019-12-20T15:22:00.003-06:002019-12-20T15:47:53.526-06:00This<a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/949721/000126246319000449/sch13g.htm">See this</a><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=&match=&CIK=gers&filenum=&State=&Country=&SIC=&owner=exclude&Find=Find+Companies&action=getcompany">Source</a><br />
<br />
<b>SkunK</b>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-51704992640854966072019-12-07T11:53:00.000-06:002019-12-07T11:53:11.136-06:00Synopsis<span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">The defendants’ case is premised on an early ruling by the district court that a 2003 bench test demonstrated that the invention was ready for patenting; and, that our prosecution attorneys committed fraud by failing to submit the 2003 bench test results and other documents referencing inventive activities from 2003 in correspondence with the patent office. </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">The 2003 bench test failed. The centrifuge plugged up. The test was also performed on the equivalent of a bottle of ‘cold vinaigrette,’ far removed from the firehose of ‘hot salad dressing’ and other real world conditions under which concentrated thin stillage exists prior to separation and recovery. Yes, it is true that the inventors had an idea and conceptual vision for what needed to be done - as seen in the speculative drawing that they produced in 2003, but that was just foresight and experimentation was needed to confirm that their idea would work. Nobody had ever recovered oil from concentrated corn ethanol stillage before. The invention was not enabled and ready for patenting until and unless a subsequent test was conducted in an ethanol plant to confirm the parameters under which the process could work. That was the inventors’ belief at the time, that was the belief of our prosecution attorneys in preparing their filings with the patent office, and I would testify to that effect today. Those are the facts. They have never been presented to a jury. </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">The defendants’ fraud claim requires defendants’ claims to be simply taken as true, notwithstanding the lack of a jury trial - i.e., that the 2003 bench test was sufficient; that the 2003 letter was not sent in pursuit of an experimental use to confirm technical viability; and that the failed 2003 bench test and 2003 letter were therefore directly relevant to patentability. We do not believe any of that is true. Not then. Not now. </span><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">The court focused its questions on these points earlier today. They wanted our response as to how our former prosecution attorneys did not commit fraud in their disclosures to the patent office. Our attorney responded that there can be no fraud without specific intent to mislead the patent office, and that specific intent was not established by the record.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Our objective on appeal was to solicit a remand for jury trial on these very issues, and most importantly on the genuine issues of material fact which were ignored at the district court level involving the failed 2003 bench test and 2003 letter, among others. It’s too early to say if we achieved that objective today, but we are in the right.</span><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><br style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" /><span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">We have delivered tremendous value to the ethanol industry. More than 90% of the industry uses processes covered by our patents today to displace more than 20 million barrels of fossil fuel and infuse more than $500 million per year of additional income into America’s rural communities. Such amounts equate to a total savings of more than 250 million barrels of fossil fuels and more than $5 billion in additional profit for the industry since inception. No known technology or process has come close to replicating those results for the industry. We will continue to vigorously pursue our rights regardless of today’s outcome. </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Anonymous</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">December 3, 2019 at 3:17 PM</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #202020; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><b>SkunK</b></span>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-10411084984262118952019-12-03T17:15:00.001-06:002019-12-03T17:18:42.084-06:00After Oral Argument <table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">12/03/2019</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"><span style="font-size: small;"> 163 </span></td><td valign="top" width="90%"><span style="font-size: small;">Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT by<br />Mr. Steven B. Pokotilow, Esq. for GS Cleantech Corporation and Greenshift Corporation, Michael Buchanan for ACE Ethanol, LLC, Aemetis Advanced Fuels Keyes, Inc., Aemetis, Inc., Al-Corn Clean Fuel, LLC, Big River Resources Galva, LLC, Big River Resources West Burlington, LLC, Blue Flint Ethanol LLC, Bushmills Ethanol, Inc., Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, Chippewa Valley Ethanol Company, LLP, Flottweg Separation Technology, Inc., GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc., Guardian Energy, LLC, Heartland Corn Products, Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC, ICM, Inc., Iroquois Bio-Energy Company, LLC, Lincolnland Agri-Energy, LLC, Lincolnway Energy, LLC, Little Sioux Corn Processors, LLLP, Pacific Ethanol Magic Valley LLC, Pacific Ethanol Stockton, Pacific Ethanol, Inc., Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC, United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC, David J. Vander Griend, Western New York Energy, LLC and Adkins Energy LLC and Mr. John M. Weyrauch for Big River Resources Galva, LLC, Big River Resources West Burlington, LLC, Lincolnland Agri-Energy, LLC, Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, Lincolnway Energy, LLC, ICM, Inc., Flottweg Separation Technology, Inc., Blue Flint Ethanol, LLC, David J. Vander Griend .<br />Panel: Judge: Reyna , Judge: Wallach , Judge: Hughes. [653510] [JCP] [Entered: 12/03/2019 10:26 AM]<br /><br /><b>SkunK</b></span><br />
<span style="font-size: small;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Document 163 is not available for public. My guess is it is the prepared oral remarks for both sides, </span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-75093461583629676892019-11-27T18:46:00.000-06:002019-11-27T18:46:02.365-06:00Paper Copies Arrive<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">1/27/2019</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"> 162 </td><td valign="top" width="90%">6 paper copies of the Corrected Opening Response Brief with Supplemental Appendix [155] received from Appellees ACE Ethanol, LLC, Aemetis Advanced Fuels Keyes, Inc., Aemetis, Inc., Al-Corn Clean Fuel, LLC, Big River Resources Galva, LLC, Big River Resources West Burlington, LLC, Blue Flint Ethanol LLC, Bushmills Ethanol, Inc., Cardinal Ethanol, LLC, Chippewa Valley Ethanol Company, LLP, Flottweg Separation Technology, Inc., GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc., Guardian Energy, LLC, Heartland Corn Products, Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC, ICM, Inc., Iroquois Bio-Energy Company, LLC, Lincolnland Agri-Energy, LLC, Lincolnway Energy, LLC, Little Sioux Corn Processors, LLLP, Pacific Ethanol Magic Valley LLC, Pacific Ethanol Stockton, Pacific Ethanol, Inc., Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC, United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC, David J. Vander Griend and Western New York Energy, LLC. [652785] [CJF] [Entered: 11/27/2019 11:53 AM]<br /><br /><span style="font-size: x-small;">This is a response to last Friday's request.</span><br /><b style="font-size: medium;"><br />SkunK</b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com13tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-50453129243243592272019-11-25T18:39:00.003-06:002019-11-25T18:40:43.579-06:00Admin II<table border="0" cellpadding="4" style="color: black; empty-cells: show; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><tbody>
<tr><td valign="top">11/25/2019</td><td nowrap="" valign="top"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> 161 </span></td><td valign="top" width="90%"><span style="font-size: small;">**TEXT ONLY** ORDER granting motion to withdraw attorney Stephen E. Underwood [160] filed by Appellants GS Cleantech Corporation and Greenshift Corporation. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. This order has been issued without an attached document and is official and binding. [651914] [JAB] [Entered: 11/25/2019 08:44 AM]</span><br />
<br />
<b style="font-size: medium;">SkunK</b></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1