Saturday, September 22, 2018

More Housekeeping

Whats in a name?
See Here

SkunK

21 comments:

nobody123789 said...

Misrepresentation of facts? No! Something else is going on!

GERS' web site screams that the appeal has been filed. ATIS CEO has issued a press release stating that the appeal has been filed. As of the close of business Friday IT HAS NOT!!!

There is no filing on PACER! The Federal Circuit Clerk of Court sees nothing at their end either. In discussions with an attorney clerking for a federal judge we found that this was very, very unusual. The fact that the filing has been broadcast over the internet does NOT satisfy the court order. The fact that the defendants are not screaming foul (filing a motion for dismissal because GERS missed the filing deadline) also follows as unusual. It is not possible, considering all that is at stake, that C&C and others just forgot to file their completed brief. There is only one conclusion, for some reason, through some procedure to which the defendants were a party not subject to public filing (via PACER), GERS has received permission not to file that brief. The attorney mentioned one possibility -- a result of an in-camera interaction with the Court.

Friday's house keeping filing adds to the mystery and drama. The case is still active and attorneys feel compelled to file with the Court a name change but NOT a critical court ordered filing which is the corner stone of more than six years of litigation?

On September 5th, Jeff Cosman, Attis’ Chief Executive Officer, stated via press release, " ... Greenshift FILED its appeal of intermediate judgments issued in CleanTech’s pending patent litigation against corn ethanol producers for infringement of five of CleanTech’s eleven issued corn oil extraction patents". Cosman must know what is going on and now his credibility is at stake (the above statement is false). The conference call on Wednesday may provide us a hint of what that is, IF someone on the call knows that the statement and therefore the entire thesis of the press release is false. I doubt Cosman will play dumb under such pressure as it would negativity impact the Attis' image, which is what he is trying to improve with the call.




Robuni said...

Noticed on the filing posted on the Greenshift website showing the words, 'Case participants only'. Went back and looked at some other filings and did not see such wording.

Might explain why no Pacer filing.

nobody123789 said...

Doesn't wash -- they missed the court ordered deadline to file. That just would not have happened, a mistake they did NOt make.

Slashnuts said...

The appeal has been filed...

It was designated case participants only. Limited access documents are not viewable on PACER.

"Limited Access to Counsel of Record and Case Participants

Where access to view a document remotely (over the Internet) is limited to Counsel of Record and Case Participants only. The document is not viewable via PACER. Access to electronic case files is available for all parties and the public at each divisional office of the USDC-OR during regular business hours. A copy fee for reproduction of an electronic document will be charged in accordance with the Schedule of Fees."

https://www.ord.uscourts.gov/index.php/cm-ecf-user-manual-all?tmpl=component&print=1

Case: 16-2231 CASE PARTICIPANTS ONLY Document: 59-1 Page: 1 Filed: 08/29/2018

Good Luck To All!$!$

nobody123789 said...

Slash, I hope you are correct but I must ask how you know that it has been filed?

I can accept that PACER might be silent on the detail of the filing (but according to an experienced attorney clerking for a federal judge there should be an entry in PACER that the filing has occurred -- not the filing itself). But I cannot accept that the Federal Circuit Clerk of Court does not have a record that the filing has occurred, and she checked several sources for us. So, I must ask how do you know what you have stated?

Anonymous said...

All - The appeal was filed by CleanTech on August 29, 2018. Successfully. On time. In compliance with all applicable standards. Conspiracy theorists swipe left. K.

Anonymous said...

Share price says it all... A no confidence vote in my opinion… Why else are we sitting at $.05? Attis agreement alone should have moved us higher. Stock seems to be contaminated...

Anonymous said...

Anon - agreed in re share price.

All - PACER access support follows:

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pacer.login.uscourts.gov&d=DwIGaQ&c=gAzS7Z2sPulVLgfP0R9Uzw&r=zQtoayD7hsASLMwR4qL9rV3LsVVohMG2v8wFNrQTXo8&m=nSfkKXjQ2bg-FrGmQRkfKgtxuZeIEb7D0obJd1k6gmw&s=VJ6YM0iwZqcFZCeIJ3H2qW_xX3z3uojReSiXvnI4CrM&e=

Search for case number 16-2231.

Click on the case number (not the case name).

Select docket item 62 for the public version of the CleanTech opening appeal brief.

nobody123789 said...

Attis conference call was very positive.


Much (the majority and the leading topic) discussion was about GERS' technology. The entire premise was that the patents will be validated. In fact the CEO once stated this as "...our (meaning Attis) appeal". If one did not know better you would have thought the appeal was over and won. However, Greenshift was not mentioned by name.

Upon direct question DW stated that he knew of no plans for KK to take GERS private. Both COES and lignin were major topics. The numbers for Attis revenue based on COES (systems I and II) sounded absurdly high. But it was nice to hear GERS' technology attached to multi billion dollar figures. No timetable was given for when this jackpot would be forthcoming.

Now, when (as he has committed to share holders and Attis) KK gets our SEC filings in order (and therefore opens GERS' stock for more brokerages as well) and when the appeal is won and the award is announced, the long suffering shareholders should be finally be rewarded?

Anonymous said...

I continue to ask this question over and over... Will the common shareholders of GERS stock be rewarded? Or will the preferred shareholders and now Attis walk away with the gains should their be any? Attis appears on the scene and it looks like they stand to reap the pending rewards and they were the last ones to the party.

Anonymous said...

Will the common shareholders of GERS stock be rewarded? Sounds like a yes according to Kevin.

Your patience and support has never been forgotten. Each of us has bled to build value for the industry. It's high time that our shareholders had a chance to participate in that value. All of our shareholders.

We're about to pay off the last remnants of our debt from before the crash. We're about to file our appeal. And, by virtue of this deal, regardless of what happens with the litigation, we're about to start growing again.

nobody123789 said...

The blather that KK has sold the patents out from under the common shareholders is now addressed.

Read the entire document carefully, there is much here to answer many questions especially, " ...that’s what we’re going to do on the Attis platform through our agreement with GreenShift who we’ve licensed the technology from ... "

Note LICENSED!!

https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/attisind/db/439/3377/transcript/ATIS+Shareholder+Update+Call+Official+Transcript+092618.pdf

Anonymous said...

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143879589

nobody123789 said...

Thank you KK. You certainly have given the posters food for thought and fuel for discussion.

I-Hub contends that they could do nothing to stop the distasteful character assassinations; several of us tried. Fortunately, the Skunk would not allow it. That makes it sound like the Skunk and you are the same person. Based on an interaction I had several years ago with DW, who thought that I was the Skunk, I know that you are not the same person.

Perhaps we can meet at 717 MADISON PLACE, N.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20439, sometime next year, or at a shareholder's meeting, or better, at a celebration of the Federal Circuit's validation of the patents and announcement of significant awarded damages in LAS VEGAS!!

Would it be possible to provide a link to this communication on the GreenShift website? Not everyone who may be interested in the company and this information will know to look at the Skunk's blog.

Thank you again.

no said...

Just spread the word. You would not believe who reads this blog and I-Hub if I told you. Yes, it will be posted on the GreenShift site.

I am not SkunK, but I remain flattered by the recurring accusations over the years. We all owe him a debt of gratitude.

Anonymous said...

She said health professionals "wanted [her] to have 10-12 cycles" of chemotherapy and that was her best chance at survival, but told her "no one with brain cancer has managed to have the full lot."

Anonymous said...

A former Playboy model who was diagnosed with brain cancer has refused chemotherapy as treatment and is reportedly using cannabis oil instead.

Anonymous said...

<-\->

Anonymous said...

Parker said she'd prefer for her hair not to fall out — a common side effect of chemotherapy — nor does she want her "face burned from radiotherapy."

Anonymous said...

According to the American Cancer Society, there have been no studies to determine the impact marijuana or hemp oil has on people. However, scientists have recently reported "that THC and other cannabinoids such as CBD slow growth and/or cause death in certain types of cancer cells growing in lab dishes."
The model said, "Cannabis has helped many others with cancer. I'm willing to put faith in it too. I can't imagine any judge would convict a girl for using cannabis to save her life. It's a risk I'm ready to take."
https://www.foxnews.com/health/former-playboy-model-with-brain-tumor-forgoes-chemo-for-cbd-report

Slashnuts said...

"Slash, I hope you are correct but I must ask how you know that it has been filed?"

How do I know the filing has been filed?
Simple. Look at the filing, it says "filed: 08/29/2018".

Good Luck To All!$!$

 
Free Blog CounterTamron