O R D E R
The parties move jointly to continue the stay of these
appeals to pursue settlement negotiations.
On April 4, 2017, the court deactivated Appeal Nos.
2016-2231, 2017-1838 pending the district court’s ruling
on a motion for reconsideration in the underlying proceedings.
The parties in all of the above-captioned appeals
now seek to continue to stay all deadlines until October
27, 2017.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted to the extent that Appeal Nos.
2016-2231, 2017-1838 remain deactivated and Appeal No.
2017-1832 remains stayed. No later than October 27,
2017, the parties are directed to inform this court of the
status of the reconsideration motion and how they believe
these appeals should proceed.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court.
See Here
SkunK
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Does the judge consult with both sides to see how close they are to a settlement so that he has enough information to stay the appeal? I would think that if they claim they are still far away to a settlement that the judge does not grant a stay, but if they were close to a settlement he would grant the stay.
Questions are, and no one has the answers:
How close are they to a settlement?
If they reach a settlement, will they settle before October 27?
Is the mediator still involved?
Will there be yet another stay?
If they settle, will the common shareholder see anything?
My guess is that ICM steps up to the plate and buys out GERS. If they acquire GERS, this all goes away quickly...
If that was a possible solution it would have happened earlier.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/indiana/articles/2017-09-21/senior-federal-judge-larry-mckinney-dies-at-age-73
Boycott the NFL!
Post a Comment