Thursday, November 20, 2014

Ethanol Producer Magazine Article

Edward Carroll, CEO and chief financial officer of GreenShift, told Ethanol Producer Magazinethat while the case was being appealed, the company’s patents remained valid.  The next step for GreenShift is appeal. “We think the judge got it wrong,” he said, explaining that district court cases on patents that are appealed go to a specialized three-judge panel that only hear cases on patents. “It’s the only district court that specializes in patent law, only because it’s so complex,” he said. “In our case, we feel that the district judge did not understand the patent law, and hopefully on appeal the three-judge panel will see our view.”

See Here

SkunK

10 comments:

nobody123789 said...

“It’s the only district court that specializes in patent law, only because it’s so complex,” he said.

EC needs to know that they are not headed to ANOTHER district court but to the Appellate Court in DC. I certainly hope that this is not an indication of their understanding of this legal process; if it C&C is leading them by the nose.

Anonymous said...

Once the appeal is officially logged, can anyone speculate on the timing?

nobody123789 said...

The last day to file is tomorrow.

Anonymous said...

EC told many people along the way that "he had more money then God"....not sure if even God could help this appeal. The patent, the companies (many many along the way) was never built on a good foundation. Don't shed a tear for EC and others...they will do just fine $$$. It's the stockholders and the 25 million owed to ya global...they are taking it in the #@#@.

As always...Good Luck To All!

nobody123789 said...

The only problem with your thesis is that USPTO disagrees with you and the defendants. The documents that served as the basis of the SJ decision were reviewed by the USPTO and the patents re-awarded. This is one of the many convoluted issues here. In such situations, according to my IP attorney colleagues, when the patents have been re-awarded in the face of the defendants documentation, the courts have been very reluctant to over rule the technical experts. It is very likely that the judge has miss-applied the patent law in this case, but to all of his judgements and inferences? Unlikely! And this is why the SJ will stand as all the components of the judge's conclusions will have to be in error for this to go to a jury.

Anonymous said...

It was much more politically correct for the judge to rule for the defendants. Money and politics never go their separate ways...

nobody123789 said...

" ... we feel that the district judge did not understand the patent law ... ".

What the heck was C&C paid millions for?

" ... he did say he was “troubled by the evidence that suggests CleanTech has engaged in a pattern of obfuscation, possible deceit and ever-shifting positions.”

Certainly not this!

Anonymous said...

How's it feel getting scammed?Sucker.

nobody123789 said...

Skunk,

Any sign of the appeal? The deadline for filing was Saturday, perhaps when the deadline is on a weekend, Monday becomes the terminal date. But you should see it soon, IF it is to be on time.

Anonymous said...

n0b0dy is styill cryong sad los so much monies hahahha suckerrrrrr learn to trade

 
Free Blog CounterTamron