Wednesday, July 2, 2014

30 Page Order

By permitting its trial counsel to play a direct role in disclosures to the PTO, CleanTech risked exposing its litigators to discovery regarding those disclosures.
 
SkunK
 

7 comments:

nobody123789 said...

This can be a game changer.

Anonymous said...

always ahs been, dumb ass.

Anonymous said...

but at this late date, less and less likely they will ever connnect the dots.

Anonymous said...

"may" have been whatever seems no more than the possibility of something else and not enough to rebut a presumption the other way.

Anonymous said...

The key FACT that will decide this issue is that the use of the GERS equipment was a TESTING Phase. Does everyone have some kind of mental defect that causes them to forget that ONE critical element? Or have you just accepted Nobody's thousand wrong posts on the issue? Go back and read for yourself. MOO DHOLE

Anonymous said...

testing does not preclude an [unintentional] sale nor end any debate over whether the subject activity was a sale or a test. obviously.

if you look around the room and dont see the mental defect, guess what

Anonymous said...

testing and sale can co-exist. they are not exclusive. jumping to THE conclusion they were testing does not rebut facts supporting a sale, it Follows the Leader. Bahhhaha!

 
Free Blog CounterTamron