Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Supremes

Supremes Change things a bit HERE

Original Opinion HERE

opinion article


SkunK

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

This has already been thrashed out in the Markman Hearings; to the point of absurdity. MOO But time will tell. Eventually. I was really just joking about "What the meaning of Is" is on a prior post, but here we go..
DHOLE

nobody123789 said...

Everybody now understand why there has been no white knight financing, no buyout, no one willing to pay fair royalties and hedging by paying both GERS and ICM? Do you think any form of SJ is as likely today as it was yesterday? Do you really think that this will be over with cash in our treasury to get out from under YAGI anytime soon? Did you notice that last green slurry in the commode -- your hard earned money getting sucked deeper into oblivion? Was this the saving grace of ICM that they have been waiting for? The reason that these proceedings have been so dragged out?

Anonymous said...

nobody - what time do ICM's offices open? Shouldn't you be at work by now? Why are you posting on company time? Or does DVG pay you to be here?

nobody123789 said...

You act as if you know with certainty that this Supreme Court ruling does not affect us. You may be wrong in several ways. It may not directly apply (that will will be determined as this grinds on) but it will give the infringers more leverage for appeal. At a minimum it will reduce GERS' leverage in settlement negotiations, and delay the outcome -- both not good news and could be worse if the Supreme Court is now going to over rule the USPTO. At a minimum it will give the lower courts pause, they hate to be overturned it is an ego thing, summary judgements, verdicts, etc. will become generally harder to achieve.

Your derisive comments cannot change this reality.

Anonymous said...

Ego you say, something DVG knows all too well about! Question, why won't ICM confirm in the last briefing rebuttal that they indemnified their clients? It is a known fact...

nobody123789 said...

Know by whom? Attested to by what document? Until and if that documentation is developed that is another urban legend that serves to stimulate GERS' common shareholders to buy more shares. Do you really think that the signers of these affidavits want to turn this into a criminal case from a civil one?

Anonymous said...

My! My! Woke up full of questions Today, didn't we? If you are asking if I think some of the principals would commit a crime for money; what is Patent Infringement but theft? I have read the Supreme Court Finding and don't anticipate it affecting the outcome of GERS case. In any event, GERS is now operating at a profit, with 32 or more honest customers...Happy Customers! MOO

Anonymous said...

32 customers extracting "oil" ?

i know what it means in English, but not in Pollack.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous! I agree that there is more to gers than the detractors say, whose only service they present is to destroy GERS, & to negatively influence the posters, but never insult us Slavs by saying "In Pollack!" You show so much sense, then you spout off like an idiot! Please, direct your insults specifically to those who are out to harm GERS and its investors!

nobody123789 said...

" ... to those who are out to harm GERS and its investors! " That is frigging paranoid!!!

 
Free Blog CounterTamron