Friday, June 21, 2013

ICM's Response to GERS Response to ICM's Writ

SEE HERE

SkunK

I don't know the quality of their argument.  However it seems a bit better written than what we have grown accustomed. It is concise . . . and tart . . . like a big bite of fresh rhubarb.  Tart?  Bitter?  It's a fine line.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

ya. hope they confuse amendment with supplement, however.

Anonymous said...

Does anyone understand how long these proceedings will be extended if the Writ is granted? I for one do not.

Anonymous said...

0.00000000000001

Anonymous said...

0.00000000000001 grrrrr.......

Anonymous said...

GGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Anonymous said...

GGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Anonymous said...

$0.0017 3,054,000 OTO 13:09:03

Who would sell this many for so little, so late in the legal process?

Anonymous said...

That is $5K, worth a legal brief or two, stop your belly aching, bills have to be paid.

Anonymous said...

0.0018 0.0017 0.0015 0.0012 0.001 0.0008 0.0005 0.0003 0.0002 0,0001 0.00001 0.000001 0.0000001 0.00000001 0.000000000000000000001..........................:(

Anonymous said...

seems to me:
a (prior) complaint goes poof if amended.
no venue issue in the 5th complaint.
icm did not move for transfer.
cleantech moved for transfer.
icm may or may not have properly answered. after due considerations, the court granted cleantech's motion.
icm did not seek a rehearing to properly advance its answer.

100k shares says the petition for "extraordinary" relief is denied.

any takers?

Anonymous said...

Who was that masked man?

 
Free Blog CounterTamron