Tuesday, September 4, 2012

TWO New COES Patent Applications

This COES patent application filed in April and published on 9 August also covers chemical additives.  Additives both as enzymes and additives used to adjust the pH. (30-32, 38, 39)
See Here

New, broader wording in this second one:
". . . recovering at least a portion of the oil-containing portion from the concentrated byproduct . . ."
See Here

SkunK

72 comments:

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
by techguess said...

ICM....has lost....GERS has covered all bases!

glta

nobody12378 said...

Tech,

This is an attempt to cover all the bases. We are many months away from the USPTO certifying the application. Doesn't this indicate that these bases may not now be covered?

Anonymous said...

nobody wants our lawyers to stop his sugar daddy is crying uncle

Anonymous said...

nobody covered all the bases with his mom

Anonymous said...

It means that the defenses "letter" was a flop. Patents are untouchable.

nobody12378 said...

I suggest that you do some reading before engaging in hopeful, wishful lip flapping.

http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/ppo_textonly.jsp

Anonymous said...

send the link to your boss gers knows how to get patents poet don't

Anonymous said...

Good one 10:53

Anonymous said...

What happened to Poet? Last I heard they wanted a patent for this.

Leibert

Anonymous said...

poet didnt get it^

Anonymous said...

time to sue poet

Anonymous said...

Not that I don't believe do you have a link?

Leibert

nobody12378 said...

It is somewhere on the Skunk Blog.

Anonymous said...

jjwood worker123 your wife was great you're an idiot glta

Anonymous said...

if icm et al end up out of business, i wonder who will fill that void ..... maybe the one owed all the M O N E Y ?


jimmowrey said...

Noteworthy from the patent application:

Additional plants presently under construction are "expected to add billions of gallons to this total in an effort to meet the current high demand."






jimmowrey said...

It was referencing Ethanol.

Anonymous said...

to Leibert 12208127

http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/!ut/p/c5/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP0os3hff1NDc1NLYwN3SzcDA08PwyD_YF8zINcYKB-JW97AiCLdBgR0h4Nci992vPIGEHkDHMDRQN_PIz83VT9SP8ocpylGZvqROanpicmV-gW5oREGmQEZgY6KigBnIW_S/dl3/d3/L0lJSklna21DU1EhIS9JRGpBQU15QUJFUkNKRXFnLzRGR2dzbzBWdnphOUlBOW9JQSEhLzdfTU81MTc1OTMwRzlGMDBJSDFST1NNNjMwMjYvQUl4OXI3MTQwMDA4L3NhLmdldEJpYg!!/

Anonymous said...

link broke^

Anonymous said...

to Leibert 12208127

http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair

by techguess said...

what fact is there that says dilution has ended?

i keep seeing the trading volume to be one half of the volume contained within the 60 minute bars when added up...

so that tells me that 50% of the shares are not trading but added in as dilution..

what else can be concluded?..that is what the volume numbers are saying

glta..long

Anonymous said...

G

Anonymous said...

O

Anonymous said...

G

Anonymous said...

E

Anonymous said...

R

Anonymous said...

S

Anonymous said...

doesnt/wont sj motion 9/15 indicate all bases ARE covered?

Anonymous said...

wow 128000 buy

Anonymous said...

they covered all the bases now they'll sj motion

nobody12378 said...

Anony 2:31,

That only $3200, this ain't AAPL. Most of the longs here have that many shares rolling around in their sock drawers. I think I found that many when I vacuumed the couch this weekend.

Anonymous said...

I bet 3 or 4 this week then litttle resistence to .09

TraderX2000

nobody12378 said...

Brave man/woman. The week will tell.

Anonymous said...

Has anybody traded call options here?

TraderX2000

Anonymous said...

nah



nah



nah



nah

Anonymous said...

NAH




NAH




NAH





NAH

Anonymous said...

D





I




L




T




I




O





N






G




O






O





D







B





Y






E

Anonymous said...

nah



nah



nah



nah

Anonymous said...

NAH




NAH




NAH





NAH

Anonymous said...

D





I




L




T




I




O





N






G




O






O





D







B





Y






E

Anonymous said...

nah

Anonymous said...

nah

Anonymous said...

nah

Anonymous said...

nah

Anonymous said...

NAH

Anonymous said...

NAH

Anonymous said...

NAH

Anonymous said...

NAH

Anonymous said...

D

Anonymous said...

I

Anonymous said...

L

Anonymous said...

U

Anonymous said...

T

Anonymous said...

I

Anonymous said...

O

Anonymous said...

N

Anonymous said...

G

Anonymous said...

O

Anonymous said...

O

Anonymous said...

D

Anonymous said...

B

Anonymous said...

Y

Anonymous said...

E

Anonymous said...

ask 3.4

Anonymous said...

Comment deleted

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

"nobodys mom is a whore, she needs to cease the dilusion"

nobody12378 said...

Any one been to the GERS web site lately? You know the place where most potential investors would start collecting information on GERS (it certainly would not be the message boards if they were real investors). Go over take a look, the last link to the improving financial picture of GERS, that any potential investor would want to have, is for the Q3 2011 SEC filing. How much effort would it be to provide potential investors this important information? How dissuasive is it not to find any recent SEC filings? In this case, you be the judge.

Anonymous said...

no trouble herehttp://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001269127&owner=exclude&count=40

nobody12378 said...

You are missing the point! This information, which was offered on the web site through Q3 of last year, should be updated for at least two reasons: 1) to provide prospective investors easy access to this important information that provides data on the growth of GERS and, 2)the lack of this information and the out-of-date appearance that this engenders may speak volumes to some about the quality of the company and/or its relationship with investors

Anonymous said...

desperate dipchit donkey boy hee haw^

Anonymous said...

Why don't you suggest the GERS website develop a chat room. That way, you and your band of yahoo misfits could take that over too!

Anonymous said...

LOOL nobody and his tool friends

 
Free Blog CounterTamron