Looks like we have the Big Mo' blowing in our GreenShift sails as we now get another litigation update.
"Accordingly, the Court must DENY ICM’s Motion to Dismiss Mr. Vander Griend as a party-defendant."
"Accordingly, as to the ‘517 Patent, ICM has not carried its burden of showing that under all the circumstances there is a substantial controversy and the Court DENIES ICM’s Motion to Amend as to the ‘517 Patent."
"However, to the extent that ICM moves to amend its Complaint to include the ‘516 Patent, the Court GRANTS the Motion."
"For the foregoing reasons the Court DENIES ICM’s Motion [master dkt. no. 163] to the extent that it seeks to dismiss David J. Vander Griend as a party and to the extent that it seeks to Amend ICM’s declaratory judgment complaint to include the ‘517 Patent. The Court GRANTS ICM’s Motion [master dkt. no. 163] to the extent that it seeks to Amend ICM’s declaratory judgment complaint to include the ‘516 Patent."
SEE HERE
SkunK
Declaratory-Judgment Actions in Patent Litigation is half way down after going to this link.
Friday, February 10, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Right on Skunk, your the best. Keep it up!
I 2nd that skunk.
"What if he asks all the wrong questions and the witnesses have all the answers? He ends up proving the prosecutions case"
- My Cosin Vinny
The court GRANTS ICM's motion to include 516 HAAAAAAAAA LMAO
-Freedom43
how much did they blow to try an get this pos off the hook not gonna happen
Post a Comment