CleanTech alleges that Vander Griend personally actively induced infringement of the ‘858 patent by agreeing to indemnify its customers for any claims arising out of the infringement of adversely owned patents as a result of the customers’ purchase and use of ICM’s corn oil extraction equipment. These indemnification agreements specify that ICM will provide a defense for the customers, at ICM’s expense, against CleanTech’s assertion that the customers infringed one or more claims of the ‘858 patent.
SEE HERE
SkunK
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
I should get paid to proof read this lawyer langwow. For these reasons, V ander Griend respectfully requests that the Court deny ICM's Motion to Quash and enlarge the time to serve V ander Griend.
Post a Comment