Except for the first link this is all about the Defendant's side of the Dave Cantrell deposition.
CEO of ICM makes Special Appearance HERE
Defendants Reply Here
Adkins Reply Here
Adkins Email
Adkins Email Affidavit
SkunK
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
The defendants reply doesn't make GERS look so good and brings up a legitimate case for invalidity.
The defendants were wrong before and gers has been right on each issue. Think of marksman. They lost their prevost prior art arguments. Now they are arguing that gers' own patents are prior art. Anyone want to lay odds on that one? Do they even have any other arguments left?
That is true but GERS was totally taken a back by this email dated earlier then claimed. GERS stated themselves that, had this been presented to them sooner, they would have filed for a new review with the USPTO. To me this shows that they acknowledge that there is at least a possibility of an invalidity finding based on this.
Post a Comment