Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Afternnoon Alert

PennyAuthority.com Afternoon Alerts:  GREENSHIFT

SEE HERE

SkunK

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

It appears this is a pump and dump website. Just read the disclaimer on their website. It reads as follows:

"Since PennyAuthority.com receives compensation from, and its owners, operators and affiliates may hold stock in, the profiled companies, there is an inherent conflict of interest in PennyAuthority.com statements and opinions and such statements and opinions cannot be considered independent. PennyAuthority.com and its owners, operators and affiliates may benefit from any increase in the share prices of the profiled companies. PennyAuthority.com services are often paid for using free-trading shares. PennyAuthority.com and/or its owners, operators and affiliates may be selling shares of stock at the same time the profile (or other information) is being disseminated to potential investors; PennyAuthority.com will not advise when it or its affiliates decide to sell. Investors must make all investment decisions based on their own judgment of the market and the particular securities."

Anonymous said...

Penny stock newsletters make money . . i.e. the purpose of a business, through either subscriptions or fees from those they cover. Maybe some from ads.

So if you are reading a newsletter that you did not pay a subscription for. Well it should hardly come as a surprise that someone else paid for it.

The pump and dump to which you refer is usually done with spam emails and faxes sent out to those who did not seek out the information. You did seek it out, therefore it is not what you suggest.

Anonymous said...

From the Penny Stock Website:

"PennyAuthority.com services are often paid for using free-trading shares......PennyAuthority.com will not advise when it or its affiliates decide to sell."

Facts are facts. Pump and Dump!

Very disappointing that GERS is participating in this activity, but not surprising considering the history. IMO

Slashnuts said...

The industry's capacity is 13.5 billion gallons.

At the start of 2011, GERS had less than 10% under license. We gained another 650-675 million gallons of capacity! 260 of that has been announced. Calgren 50, marquis 50, Otter Tail/GPRE 50, Sunoco, 110. Where's the other 400 million?

15% of that means we have about 2 billion under license as of right now! Over 400 million gallons of unannounced license agreements.??. I mean the Marksman hearing seems to have vanished and now GERS is saying they licensed 50% of the expected 1.3 Billion with more to come during the rest of the year!??!

Over 400 million gallons of ethanol production under license has not yet been announced!??! Is this related to the settlement???

20% capacity by the end of the year means 2.6 billion under license. 4% extraction on 2.6 billion gallons with a 20% royalty of $.72, add in the already announced equipment sales, were looking at $80,000,000 a year in revenues with a cap of $2 million.

All debt will be paid in full and we'll be highly profitable.


Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$

Anonymous said...

Hey Slash, I have a Unicorn I would like to sell you. Its located at the end of the rainbow. Just follow the yellow brick road until you find it, but pay me first!

Slashnuts said...

By the way, all of the infringers currently under litigation, add up to roughly 875 million gallons of capacity.

If they settled or not, we'll be debt free and profitable!!!

Slashnuts said...

Yellow brick roads always lead back to Kansas, LMFAO!$!$

Anonymous said...

The RS announcement just proves that once again, this is all just a smoke screen! The posters/pumpers want you to believe that any moment now this thing will explode. Meanwhile, trades show that people are slowly creeping towards the exit. Wonder how many bag holders will be left this time around waiting for GERS to be profitable!

Anonymous said...

Received from investor relations:

"We appreciate your concerns. I hope the following is helpful:

First, a reverse split is needed to comply with our loan agreements. Avoidable concerns with loan compliance will arise before the end of the year if our lenders require conversions of more than about $200,000 in debt per quarter, which is likely to occur. Action needs to be taken today to ensure that we have sufficient authorized stock to prevent any default events before they occur. Next, we are not allowed by law to issue stock at prices below the par value of our common stock ($0.0001 per share). Since our lenders have the right to demand and receive shares of our common stock at a discount to market prices, we are forced to incur costly penalties as debt is converted into stock. These penalties have the potential to be substantial depending on market conditions, and they will interfere with our ability to meet our stated 2011 goals unless we take action now."

Anonymous said...

More:

"Significant recent market changes are also relevant. Various third party companies involved with the transfer of our common stock have implemented changes in their policies and procedures that have had a negative impact on all of us. For example, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (“DTC”), a company responsible for all electronic transfers of stock, has ceased to provide transfer services involving many small companies including GreenShift. In another example, TD Ameritrade, Inc., as well as several other retail brokers, have refused to allow several of our shareholders to execute investment decisions involving our stock, citing the substantial cost of completing physical transfers (paper and mail) of our stock due to our ineligibility for DTC’s electronic transfer services. In still another example, in June 2011, Penson Financial Services, Inc., one of the largest of a group of companies that provides essential transactional services for transfers of stock, published a new restriction that it would not accept deposits of equity securities that are priced below $0.10 per share. Penson cited the “substantial additional requirements” it has historically absorbed as well as the increased cost and risk of providing clearing services for companies that do not meet Penson’s new criteria. It is possible, if not probable, that other clearing firms will make similar changes in the near future. These market changes collectively show a clear trend towards reduced market access for small companies with negative implications that we should all consider. A split can help to offset these concerns by reducing transactional costs for these entities while giving our stock the ability to meet third party requirements as they arise."

Anonymous said...

follow the yellow brick road back to colwich kansas

Anonymous said...

Last one:

"Without a split, we collectively face increased risk of debt default, costly penalties for payments priced below par value, increasingly more stringent market restrictions, and reduced access to the equity markets. However, opportunity costs should also be taken into account. A key question here is whether we will be able to meet our goals faster or more cost-effectively with a split. Consider the last 90 days. Our annual report reported satisfaction of all of our goals for 2010, especially including our return to positive cash flow. Our March 31, 2011 quarterly report demonstrated significant additional progress, including another $7 million of debt reduction and our transition to operating income. We have won and announced significant new business, bringing our penetration to more than about 1.9 billion gallons per year of licensed ethanol production. And, yet, the price of our stock today is the same as it was six months ago, resisting appreciation in the face of significant progress and dramatically reduced debt conversions in 2011 as compared to prior years.

Finally, the split is also intended to facilitate additional debt reduction and further improvement of our balance sheet. Additional updates in this regard will be provided in the coming weeks. 

Thank you for your continued interest and support.

Regards,
Investor Relations"

Anonymous said...

"The pump and dump to which you refer is usually done with spam emails and faxes sent out to those who did not seek out the information. You did seek it out, therefore it is not what you suggest."

That is certainly an idiosyncratic take on what constitutes P&Ds.

Anonymous said...

Also:

"Dear Shareholder:

That newsletter is neither from, nor paid for, nor in any authorized by GreenShift.

Thank you for your interest and support.

Regards,
Investor Relations"

Anonymous said...

Interesting. No one has EVER returned my emails from GERS. I have emailed them practically begging for an update of ANY kind and even asked specific questions and ever received a reply. Therefore, I call BS on these posts!! There is not an "investor relations" department, only a "Reverse Split" department. They appear to meet once per year, sign some paperwork, go to the bank, deposit all the stolen shareholder money, wash, rinse, and repeat!

Anonymous said...

What? 1.9 billion gallons? Wow! Still more to come?

sooner or later people will figure this a winner

nobody123789 said...

That material should have been placed in a shareholder letter, not some random communication to one person. Overall, still sounds as if they are hurting for cash and cannot pay their bills, thus conversion and dilution. Hard to square all the statements. Maybe it is because I have limited intelligence.

Anonymous said...

quarterly said the company owes a 1time 155 k for every machine signed with over a dozen signed 155 k adds up quick for a company on the verge of profits. safe to say this is why, no? what about 6 months later? anyone must admit the explosive growth debt reduced

Anonymous said...

To the last anonymous:

That's a great point. Plus they're stepping up the litigation since it's gained so much business. I'm really surprised at that 1.9 b.

GOLDDIGGER said...

Is the 1.9 Billion cofirmed by Greenshift or is that from some random Email?

redman34990 said...

i received the same letter in a email response signed by Kevin Kreisler. I beleive were are on the yellow brick road to OZ.$$$$ and if lenders can demand shares then the only way the company can protect its shareholders is to have a repurchase plan to off set the shrs dilution. at $200,000. per qtr gers is diluting 2.0 mil. shrs at $0.10 8 mil for the year. huge dilution.70%
we are stuck in wait and see.

The Galatian Free Press said...

Question for slashnuts (or others):

If the United States Marine Corps can launch a powerful precision military assault anywhere in the world, within 6 hours of notice from the President, then why the hell does it take Greenshift so freakin' long to build these G*D D*&M COES installs on free American Soil???

The Galatian Free Press said...

Look, all that stuff about the capital markets may well be true, but that is nothing more than a way to pass the blame for operational problems that are under the control of management.

The more important question to ask is this: "Why do we need more conversions in the first place?"

That 10% market share should be substantially up and running by now; and the need for conversions at all should be behind us.

The problem here is not these financial market issues. That is just KK's excuse.

The real problem here is that GERS is not executing well at the operational level.

That is not a problem that can be blamed on the capital markets.

That is a problem with management.

The only thing that will really get this stock moving is:

1. New CEO
2. Major capital overhaul.

redman34990 said...

1.9 bil. gal. in an email from kevin confirming 1.9 mil.gal. you know the company should take the hit by buying the shars they need and converting them at a discount if they have to. Rev. split just sticks to all of us share holders. They said they had positive cash flow in the yearend statement.so why a 1000/1 why not 100/1. based on the math 20.0 mil shares at $0.01 would be needed for the $200,000. trade off per qtr. we were trading 150-250 mil.pdy

The Galatian Free Press said...

A CEO is measured by his stock chart.

Kevin's five year stock chart goes from $4.00 to $0.0001 per share.

Who agrees with me, that it is time for a new CEO at Greenshift?

http://www.google.com//finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&chvs=Logarithmic&chdeh=0&chfdeh=0&chdet=1311742436004&chddm=477020&chls=IntervalBasedLine&q=OTC:GERS&ntsp=0

Anonymous said...

All things considered the CEO is doing a fine job. He continues to cut debt and license new business. The patent pirates are at fault here.

Batman said...

Maybe after the split at .10 to .20 it could go back up to $5 +

 
Free Blog CounterTamron