Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Update

Resolve Issues by March 4th

Scheduling Order

GERS Request to Reply

GERS Reply

SkunK


11 comments:

Anonymous said...

new patent?:

http://stks.freshpatents.com/Gs-Cleantech-Corporation-nm1.php

"Application # 20150048534 02/19/15 Thermoplastic compositions containing biobased materials and processes for forming an article therewith"

nobody123789 said...

One thing is clear, the Honorable Judge Larry thinks that GERS is up to its eye-balls in nefarious behavior.

Anonymous said...

GreenShift Receives Notices of Allowance on Three New Corn Oil Extraction Patents

— back to news —

ALPHARETTA, GEORGIA, January 20, 2015 – GreenShift Corporation (OTCQB: GERS) announced today that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") recently issued Notice of Allowances for the following U.S. Pat. Application Nos.:
•13/450,997 titled "Methods of Processing Ethanol Byproducts and Related Subsystems" (the "'997 Patent Application") on December 19, 2014;
•13/185,841 titled "Method and Systems for Enhancing Oil Recovery from Ethanol Production Byproducts" (the "'841 Patent Application") on December 24, 2014; and,
•11/908,891 titled "Methods and Systems for Washing Ethanol Production Byproducts to Improve Oil Recovery" (the "'891 Patent Application") on December 26, 2014.

The Notices of Allowances for these applications were issued by the USPTO after a review of a recent Summary Judgment decision and other filings by the defendants in an ongoing infringement action against multiple defendants by GS CleanTech Corporation, a subsidiary of GreenShift. Each of the recently allowed patent applications was examined and considered patentable by a different examiner and after each had considered the Summary Judgment decision.

The Summary Judgment issued on October 23, 2014 by the District Court in Indiana and ruled in favor of defendants on their motions for summary judgment alleging that the corn oil extraction patents issued to GS CleanTech were invalid, including US Pat. Nos. 7,601,858 and 8,168,037. As previously announced GreenShift intends to appeal the Summary Judgment decision. Under applicable standards, a patent is not invalid until and unless a final judgment of invalidity is rendered after all available appeals have been exhausted.

"We believe in our intellectual property rights and the system of checks and balances designed to protect those rights, both in the patent office and the courts," said Kevin Kreisler, GreenShift's chief executive officer. "We will appeal the Summary Judgment ruling at the appropriate time. In the meantime, we remain focused on growth, innovation and bringing value to our licensees."
Coverage of Allowed Claims
The allowed '997 Patent Application is a continuation application of US Pat. No. 7,601,858, and involves the concentration and mechanical processing of thin stillage to recovery at least a portion of the oil from the concentrate. The '891 Patent Application and the '841 Patent Application are continuation applications of US Pat. No 8,168,037. The allowed claims in the '841 Patent Application cover processes directed to evaporating thin stillage to reduce water content, recovering oil with a horizontal centrifugal three phase decanter, evaporating the concentrate to further reduce its moisture content, and mixing the evaporated concentrate with distillers wet grains. The allowed claims in the '891 Patent Application include processes directed to washing whole stillage with thin stillage to increase the oil content of the thin stillage, followed by concentration and recovery of oil.

Anonymous said...


The Notices of Allowances for these applications were issued by the USPTO after a review of a recent Summary Judgment decision and other filings by the defendants in an ongoing infringement action against multiple defendants by GS CleanTech Corporation, a subsidiary of GreenShift. Each of the recently allowed patent applications was examined and considered patentable by a different examiner and after each had considered the Summary Judgment decision.

Anonymous said...

Bottom line:
Each of the recently allowed patent applications was examined and considered patentable by a different examiner and after each had considered the Summary Judgment decision.

nobody123789 said...

Some of us have been earnestly trying to provide a balanced perspective on this company over the years; not too hyped either way -- just balanced. That has often been viewed as very negative by GERS' boosters. It would be informative for those that have recently ventured on the scene to look at some of the hopes and beliefs that have crashed on the rocks of reality. For example, I-Hub post 10512 is typical -- four years ago:

"GERS has a market cap of only $2.65 million at the moment despite the large number of outstanding shares. This is a company with the potential market cap in the billions based on patented technology licensing and royalties. GreenShift could very easily join the DOW some day and in my opinion the NASDAQ or NYSE is almost a given once profitability is achieved. See my recent sticky post communication with GreenShift legal for more details on the share structure. I think we should have great news in the coming weeks and months".

Anonymous said...

one of those earlier posts said nothing was really expected for some 5 years or so

Anonymous said...

Through continued innovation, GERS throws the ethanol industry another lifeline. DDS to plastic filler. GPRE.

02/19/15 Thermoplastic compositions containing biobased materials and processes for forming an article therewith

nobody123789 said...

If it is such a "lifeline" why is no one paying for it?

Anonymous said...

The main inventor of all GERS patents (DW) was fired by KK.

Anonymous said...

• Currently have 50 significant customers
with expressed interest to trial
• 20 Customer trials in queue; 7 customers
with dedicated R&D Programs

nobody123789 said...
If it is such a "lifeline" why is no one paying for it?

February 27, 2015 at 9:49 AM

 
Free Blog CounterTamron