Monday, May 27, 2013

Seach

Here is a free search page that can inform us quickly if Cleantech Corporation v. Pacific Ethanol, Inc. will stand on its own - or if it is only the start of another round of infringement litigation.  Putting "Cleantech" in the search line gives initial results faster than the official "pacer" system.  I suspect we will know the answer within three weeks.  Once a new litigation is established, the usefulness of this search vehicle gets a bit cloudy.  Although Pacer charges 10c/page, these private systems charge a premium.

SkunK

42 comments:

nobody123789 said...

"Stand on its own", by this do you mean just a single patent infringement suit against PEIX versus another multiple defendant suit such as adding Valero?

Thank you for providing this link.

Anonymous said...

hiking dating http://loveepicentre.com/contact/ computer matchmaking dating northern cape province
8 simple rules for dating [url=http://loveepicentre.com/faq/]online dating ireland[/url] sex dating in glasgow
michael smidt dating psychos [url=http://loveepicentre.com/faq/]pelham puppet skeleton dating value[/url] dating issues [url=http://loveepicentre.com/user/Ryan14/]Ryan14[/url] adult xxx black dating sites

Anonymous said...

old stuff (10 percent license):

http://www.biofueldaily.com/reports/Carbonics_Acquires_Rights_To_Algae_Bioreactor_Technologies_999.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/19/idUS171631+19-Aug-2010+BW20100819

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Westport+Energy+Holdings+Inc.&match=contains&action=getcompany

fyi maybe.

nobody123789 said...

As I stated Saturday, the fact that GERS has filed against PEIX is expected based on the statements in the filings. It is the timing that is most disconcerting. The use of another law firm with no IP experience may also be an issue and understanding why C & C was not involved as they where when the Minneapolis IP firm did the initial filings in May, 2010 may be important to this timing decision. These May, 2010 filings carried the relationship between that firm and C & C with the identification of "Of Counsel" for C & C. "Of Counsel" means : The title of an attorney or firm who is employed by a law firm or an organization, but is not an associate or a partner. Until it is stated otherwise, it is reasonable to assume that there is no "Of Counsel" relationship between the Sacramento law firm and C & C.

I think that a huge chess game between KK and DVG is being played out with the GERS' common shareholders as the pawns. I hope that I am wrong but statements by current holders of GERS' common stock exemplify potential investor reaction -- no more money going to GERS until the presses stop. Did DVG just put KK's king in checkmate? By indemnifying PEIX so deeply into the litigation clearly going GERS' way did DVG waive a red flag at the bull, KK, that he could not refuse to charge? If no other funding/financing is put forward to pay for this second front and the costs of the new law firm many are suspicious that we will pay through dilution. BUT, most are tired of witnessing this dilution and will not add to the nearly $120 million that common shareholders have poured into this over years. So, what happens if KK can no longer sell shares to pay for this new commitment? Is bankruptcy then on the horizon? If so, it was a master move by DVG to entice the bull to charge into this front.

I periodically, reevaluate if I am willing to put more money on the table. The odds of the outcome influence this decision greatly. Until we get answers to at least some of these questions the odds just changed and not in a good way. No more money on the table, and if many others feel the same way, what will happen if KK cannot sell his shares?

nobody123789 said...

No press release yet 30 minutes before market opens.

Anonymous said...

GGGRRRRRRRREEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Anonymous said...

6s coming

Anonymous said...

6s coming

Anonymous said...

G
G
G
R
R
R
R
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

nobody123789 said...

I think that you said that about 3's (0.003) that we never achieved.

Anonymous said...

wrong hit 3 now 6s coming

Anonymous said...

thats right basher boy it did hit 3's

Anonymous said...

6s coming

Anonymous said...

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Anonymous said...

6s coming then 9s

nobody123789 said...

Not to worry, in the past any time there has been any sort of an up-tick there has been dilution selling into it that brings the PPS down again.

Anonymous said...

GGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Anonymous said...

SETTLEMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nobody123789 said...

PEIX gets sued by GERS; market response up 3+ %. A message?

Anonymous said...

Learn how to read, Basher Boy. More like 19%! So you want a message? How's this, F**K OFF!!

This guy just can't stand good news!

nobody123789 said...

If you could read you would know that 1) this may not be good news and 2) PIX was up 3% despite the suit being filed. I guess no one else is taking seriously.

Anonymous said...

advice dating parent teen 20 http://loveepicentre.com/testimonials/ 100 free christian dating site
desktop dating [url=http://loveepicentre.com/testimonials/]dating site addiction[/url] twink dating services
divorced man dating [url=http://loveepicentre.com/map/]women dating men motorcycle[/url] is tyrese gibson dating anyone [url=http://loveepicentre.com/user/s348367687/]s348367687[/url] free phone dating services lansing

nobody123789 said...

PEIX continues it PPS progression. That law suit has the investment world scared -- not!

Anonymous said...

PEIX dropping is progress? You really are warped, aren't you!

Anonymous said...

peix sued friday down 10% that day down today down tomorrow

Anonymous said...

what a jackass paid basher

Anonymous said...

bid stacked 2800000

Slashnuts said...

Update: Patent Infringing PEIX has 21 Days to Respond

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/patent-lawsuits/california-eastern-district-court/519352/gs-cleantech-corporation-v-pacific-ethanol-inc/docket-text/


5/28/2013

4

PATENT NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Patent #1:* 7,601,858 B2 * * 10/13/09 * * GS Cleantech Corporation * (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form, # 2 Order re Filing Requirements, # 3 Patent Report, # 4 VDRP) (Davis, D) (Entered: 05/28/2013)



5/28/2013

3

SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Pacific Ethanol, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Megan Alicia Lewis* *400 Capitol Mall* *22nd Floor* *Sacramento, Ca 95814*. (Manzer, C) (Entered: 05/28/2013)



5/28/2013


[DISREGARD] PATENT NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Patent #1:* 7,601,858 B2 * * 10/13/09 * * GS Cleantech Corporation * ; (Manzer, C) Modified on 5/28/2013 (Manzer, C). (Entered: 05/28/2013)



5/28/2013


RECEIPT number #CAE200052752 $400.00 fbo GS Cleantech Corporation by Megan Lewis on 5/28/2013. (Manzer, C) (Entered: 05/28/2013)



5/24/2013

1

COMPLAINT for Patent Infringment against all defendants by GS Cleantech Corporation. Attorney Lewis, Megan Alicia added. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lewis, Megan) (Entered: 05/24/2013)

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$

Anonymous said...

GGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Anonymous said...

G
G
G
G
G
G
R
R
R
R
R
R
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

Anonymous said...

GGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Anonymous said...

ask 3.2 !

Anonymous said...

ask 3.2 !

Anonymous said...

-pix -down +gers +up

Slashnuts said...

Thou Shalt Not Steal Thy Patents

You can infringe for a long time
Infringe for a long time
You can infringe for a long time
Sooner or later God'll cut you down
Sooner or later God'll cut you down

Go tell that bald head liar(DVG)
Go and tell that law defier(NK)
Tell the lawyers, the infringers, the back biters
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down

You can infringe for a long time
Infringe for a long time
You can infringe for a long time
Sooner or later the court's will shut you down
Sooner or later injunction's will shut you down

To me, the new patent infringement lawsuit filed against PEIX is a perfected package wrapped up by Cantor Colburn, stamped with 2 Markman rulings, and topped with a double-checked bow, compliments of the USPTO.

Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould $ Birney is one of the most reputable lawfirms in California. They're one of the oldest too, in business for 80 years. They specialize in business law. Cantor Colburn has done a wonderful job, they've been in business 40 years. Since their offices are in Washington, D.C., Atlanta, Houston, Hartford, and Detroit, WFHGB has been hired as the "UPS driver" to deliver CC's perfected package.

GERS has explained time and again that cash being raised was for expanding the litigation. They've been adding $400K in cash about every quarter lately. GERS is also repaying YA at a rate of 2X's more than last year, limiting dilution.

If CC is $50K a month, WFHGB shouldn't cost much. Especially since they're just down the street from PEIX in Sacramento.
Another aspect is the lawsuit mentions Stockton, the plant with Edeniq's system. Edeniq doesn't indemnify infringers that I've ever heard of. Edeniq certainly didn't indemnify Amaizing Energy when ANDE settled the lawsuit. So PEIX is directly involved now, burning millions in cash they don't have. This is an excellent move by GERS and CC.
This is an excellent move with perfect timing. Right as PEIX starts it up. I believe an injunction against PEIX is coming much sooner than most here expect.

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$

nobody123789 said...

A lot of positive assumptions, similar to those that have not panned-out in the past. Because the assumptions are good for GERS doesn't make them true; it makes them wishful thinking until proven otherwise. Sounds like the Disneyland theme and wishing upon a star.

nobody123789 said...

For example:

"WFHGB has been hired as the "UPS driver" to deliver CC's perfected package."

"If CC is $50K a month, WFHGB shouldn't cost much. Especially since they're just down the street from PEIX in Sacramento."

If you know these facts to be true you are an insider divulging information incorrectly, and that is a crime. I do not think you are a criminal therefore you do not know these statements to be true. Remember the old age, beware of the used car salesman promising too much.

Anonymous said...

pix red gers green

Raddog2003 said...

And now PEIX posted that they are producing Corn Oil with ICM's Inc.'s Advanced Oil Seperation System at Magic Valley, ID plant.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/pacific-ethanol-begins-production-corn-123000422.html

nobody123789 said...

They would not be doing this without the advice of their legal counsel since the suit was filed last week.

Anonymous said...

and pix drops

Anonymous said...

pix down again

 
Free Blog CounterTamron