Sunday, September 2, 2012

New COE Patent!

The purpose of this submission is to notify the court that on August 29, 2012, the USPTO granted a Notice of Allowance (“NOA”) for Application Ser. No. 13/107,197. A NOA is an indication that the USPTO believes that “the applicant is entitled to a patent under the law.”

See Here

This is extremely important not only as a new patent.  The first NOA was issued on 13 April 2012.  On July 12th GreenShift sent this letter HERE telling the patent office in detail about the dated email controversy involving Mr. Cantrell.  They asked the patent office to take a look at that and more prior art.  The patent office comes right back and now - reissues the NOA. 

the 30 claims:
1 - one
2 - two
3 - three
4 - four
5 - five
Sorry for the separate pages, but this computer I am now on has a PDF license that is lacking . . .

SkunK

50 comments:

Anonymous said...

BOOM.. the defendants don't stand a chance.

Anonymous said...

stick a fork in them their done!!

nobody12378 said...

If the only barrier to riches was the existence of patents, we would all be rich by now. Wise up -- the only ones making money off the patents are the attorneys and the inner circle of GERS.

Anonymous said...

Hopefully some news of a settlement or preliminary injunction soon. Not sure why would not have either, dueto material harm to stock price, as viewed by judge.

Anonymous said...

Every positive you make negative. You are invested here to make money you say it all the time. Why would you be here if you believe that the only ones making money will be insiders. Do you believe you won't make any money here?
If so why are you here? If not why are you so negative this only strengthens our case.


Nycdream

nobody12378 said...

You need to read before you react; where have I ever said that I WILL not make money here, where? The money will come, just not in the time frame that many suspect. My objective statements only frame that reality that so many fail or are unwilling to accept. This talk about September 15th as Deliverance Day is such nonsense that I cannot stop laughing. I think that one of the problems here is that many of the holders of this stock are getting on in years and do not want to face the truth that they may not live long enough to see what is at the end of this rainbow

Anonymous said...

the only money nobody will make is if his mom pays up for hooking otherwise he broke

Anonymous said...

GreenShift-ing focus pre grant damageshttp://www.greenpatentblog.com/2009/11/05/greenshift-ing-focus-to-pre-grant-damages-in-ethanol-processing-patent-suit/

Ethanol producer #9 said...

I heard they made KK a settlement offer but KK gave them the bird.

Anonymous said...

If that was true why wouldn't they accept
Think your full of it ethanol producer

Anonymous said...

Wow the defense has no chance in hell.

nobody12378 said...

You are wrong! There is a 30+ % chance that the defense will win on appeal because of what some would call legal technicalities. The way in which the appeals court in DC views claims construction is different than the way the district courts deals with them. This reality is truly a sad state of affairs for our patent justice "system", but sad as it is it is the reality. This statistic is from a DC appellate court staffer and has been developed over many years. This technicality frequently has nothing to do with the merits of the case -- justice as some here like to call it. I would say that 30% is far more than no chance and what DVG is banking on -- literally.

Anonymous said...

Until they slap an injunction on them and then a settlement with no appeal. Go screw your 30 percent. Plus they are not gonna go against the uspto why even have an office if it won be upheld

nobody12378 said...

Keep putting your head in the sand. A settlement would bring closure by definition but it is not going to happen; even the GERS's principals have said this. And anything a lower court does, from injunctions to final adjudication can be appealed to the Appellate Court in DC. They even have a right to motion the Supreme Court if they do not like the Appellate Court outcome. The Supreme Court does not have to take the appeal, but this all takes TIME, and TIME is not on the side of the common shareholders, many of whom are elderly. And as for the 30%, it is an average over several years (actually the number is 35%), and averages only measure the risk, they do not describe the outcome of each appeal. The fervor of your response is telling -- you are having a hard time accepting the reality here.

Anonymous said...

Somebody really busy thinking and talking for other people again.

Hey, all you many elderly commons you hear that? Time is not on your side!
So buzz off you oldies.




Anonymous said...

Reality that you want Gers to fail.

Anonymous said...

Nobody's negative panic motives to drive the stock down become more and more prevalent with each additional piece of positive GERS news.

I hope no one is stupid enough to actualy believe his b.s.

His negative motives are as clear as a window.

nobody12378 said...

Let's see; since the last R/S, revenue up, profit achieved, dilution may have been brought under control, most, if not all, of the court action favors GERS at this time, loan being paid off, etc.,etc. You are correct much positive news. The market response -- down 70%. So wise up you are not smarter than the market, and you better ask yourself what do they know that I do not? And I have told you. Labeling the sad truth as b.s. only make the claimant an idiot. Putting the GERS shares aside for your estate with no short term expectations -- the wise thing.

Anonymous said...

desperate dipchit^

Anonymous said...

Nobody you are so wrong about a lot of these things going on. It would be wise or you to be quiet. This will be over sooner than you think. Wink wink.

Anonymous said...

If there truly are no short term expectations, then why must you constantly slam any bit of positive news or positive thinking?

If you truly believed what you preached then you wouldn't bother posting on these boards every other day, or making sure you're the first person to bash any sort of 'minor' victory or other positive news.

But instead, here you are.
Actively trying to convince everyone that this stock is terrible short term, and only has potential long term.

That's great. We've heard you say it, over and over again. Why are you still on here trying to push your opinion and views on everyone else?

Why is it that you greet every bit of positive news with complete disdain?

If I truly believed the twisted view you portray of GERS, then I wouldn't be posting every day, actively trying to convince people this is a terrible short term investment, and only has the slight possibility of long term gain.

I wouldn't be actively following the investor boards daily to argue with anyone and everyone that thinks this has short term potential. I wouldn't be constantly following the investor boards daily to make sure I can post a pessimistic "objective" view of every single little tiny bit of positive news that comes out.

If I really believed this stock had no chance short term, and only a chance of long term potential, than I would stop posting, for the long term, and move on with my life.

But that's not at all what we see from you, Nobody.

You appear to be on a mission to force your bleak view of this stock on everyone that looks into it.

If positive news about a company you're invested in comes out, why is it a problem for you when people state the obvious; that good news is good news? Instead of agreeing its good news, you have to ALWAYS try to convince everyone that the positive news means absolutely nothing and to stop investing.

That's not how an investor of the company acts. That's not even how an "objective" follower of the stock would act. Someone objective might post their opinion every now and then, or just ignore people who think positively and move on to another stock you don't feel the need to be "objective" about.

But instead, you actively try to CONVINCE people that this stock has no short term potential, that we only have minimal chance even long term.

Why? Why are you soo pushy about your negative, pessimistic views?

It's really obvious why... and you're not fooling ‘anybody’ but yourself, Nobody.

Anonymous said...

Nobody gonna be out of a job after icm loses the case lol.
Still stuck in your moms basement nobody.
Oh yeah company is gonna fail but he just bought shares o increase his position yeah right

Anonymous said...

GERS is a bitch and then you die.

Nice spin no body

u r a joke

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the heads up SkunK. That letter was a ? mark that's been erased. The defendents have no chance in hell.

nobody12378 said...

I only counter the misinformation of the euphorians. I won't have to wait long before a new crop of cadets needs to be conditioned as those with their unrequited short-term expectations will be on to other dreams with their tails tucked between their legs and their money in another person's pocket. No crystal ball needed for that, they are the second or third generation of cadets to fade under the pressure of this reality.

Anonymous said...

Loser

Anonymous said...

News flash....same crap different day. This patent is built on the 858, which is the subject of the legal fight and has a slim chance of making of it according to some thier own council.

Anonymous said...

dipchit donkey boy playing with himself^

Anonymous said...

It looks like nobody is panicing. How much you short?

Anonymous said...

nobody just accept it your mom is a whore, it cant be undone...go cry in the corner

Anonymous said...

my group and i are buying about 3 mil shares over the new few months, this will hit .50 no problem ...btw dont worry about nobody he has no idea what hes talking about.
glta!

Anonymous said...

that letter was the defendents hopes and dreams !!

nobody12378 said...

Anony 3:29 -- Looks like TotalTruth(lessness) is back with his phantom group. It is truly amazing the lengths penny flippers will go to manufacture some more decimal dust for their convenience and well-being.

Anonymous said...

Lol I agree with you nobody on that alone. That's so totaltruth

Anonymous said...

Pps target $2 glta

Anonymous said...

From your mouth to g-ds ears but I think your on crack

Anonymous said...

i think nobodys mom is a crack whore

Anonymous said...

A proft of .16 a pe of 10 is 6.40 shares. Cap 250 million would be fair .. settlement cash . no debt

Anonymous said...

Like how ur thinking plus a win in court sets us up to go after poet doubling up our business who knows maybe an out of court settlement. One can dream $$$$$$$


I know nobody but I can't hear you because my head is in the sand

Anonymous said...

Lol that's funny. Total truth didn't guess one thing right. He didn't know what he was talking about.

nobody12378 said...

Anony 7;45, Do you really want another five year journey down litigation lane? These journeys are so much easier for large companies than smaller ones. Do you really want to continue to fund the litigation through the potential of more dilution? Or would you rather spend OUR money on marketing the superior product, impressing clients with the service and bringing them on board willingly, expanding our markets into other countries, and developing a royalty formula that is not oppressive? Do you want to do this before the next technological innovation in this theater antiquates GERS' COES? I thought so, you are a smart person.

Anonymous said...

You sound like a competitor

nobody12378 said...

When is a sound marketing strategy bad business? When is coercion better than promotion? When is a wise allocation of OUR money a bad idea? When is getting out of debt and stabilizing your financial reports consistent with the objectives of a competitor? Think before you write such inane comments.

Anonymous said...

Sue the crap out of them its working were profitable and retiring debt. I think we saw what happens when we asked them to play nice, they steal. Sue more, big companies are afraid. Contingency is free

nobody12378 said...

Contingency free? We paid in $600,000 in the first quarter of this year, $50,000 a month since then AND when we win GERS has agreed to pay an unspecified percentage of OUR money (the award) to the attorneys. [This accounting does not account foe the hundreds of thousands paid before this year]. That doesn't meet my definition of free. Sounds like you would rather be in the business of litigation than marketing and selling technology. Are you an attorney?

Anonymous said...

defendents pay millions a month gers pays 50 k were profitable they are not if your stealing it will be punished, sue more

Anonymous said...

You want the litigation to stop ?? Ibet you do we want the infringing to stop

Anonymous said...

His boss is losing he's crying for mercy.

nobody12378 said...

Is that what I said Bozo? The reading comprehension level here is abysmal.

Anonymous said...

dipchit loser^

 
Free Blog CounterTamron