Saturday, July 21, 2012

ICM can Amend

ICM can amend it's filing to include '517
SEE HERE

SkunK

55 comments:

wayback said...

watching,reading,waiting

Anonymous said...

On June 29, 2012, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to amend their pleadings to include the ‘517 Patent. Master dkt. no. 393. CleanTech has not responded to ICM’s motion.

Total melt-down of this improperly managed money sucking company. I guess GERS has decided they milked this one as far as they can take it and are dividing the spoils to move on to another "shell company" before they lose the money they scammed from this one.

Anonymous said...

Yes, years of litigation battle defending rightfully owned patents that affect the entire corn oil/ethanol industry, all for a scam they could have just as easily done without a single patent.

Idiot. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Anonymous said...

Rightfully....I would debate that all day long. I have heard from a former employee from the largest centrifuge manufacturer in the world that he ran trials and promoted this concept as early as 1996. Greenshift is took advantage of a opportunity I will give you that but they are far from perfect in this mess.

Anonymous said...

on the ball is what they are --- pioneers!
others too stupid to obtain a patent --- oh well.

Anonymous said...

Using a centrifuge for oil removal was invented and patented by DW and DC. End of story. Pay up and shut up!

Anonymous said...

These idiots could not manage wiping there A#*. They are incompetent scammers. Who buys a biodiesel technology company that has not been vetted out for $20 million? Who buys a Crush Plant in Montana that had not made a profit in 30 years? Who buys a failed Biodiesel Plant that would never work? However, who gets rich on us? Why is there not any investor relations? It would be too bold to further risk SEC action.

Anonymous said...

That's right. Why will KK and EC not givr up their non-diluted shares. They have total control. The inventors may simply take their ball (patents) and go home leaving the scammers with the same "shell" company it was to begin with. They simply play this shematic over and over again. Look at KK's history. I am sure he is now moving on and looking for the next "new technology" buzz word to do the same with ADRN or GSEN. Follow the history of this guy.

Anonymous said...

It's so obvious when basher's have a motive to drive the price down.
If you hate the company so much and have no faith in the stock, then shut up and get out.
Whats the point in taking details from the past, exagerating the hell out of them, and making a theory out of them that sounds bad?

Oh, is it because you're trying to drive the price down? There is absolutely no other possible reason to go on so much with rediculous theories that scare current and potential investors.

A normal person would say, "I don't trust this company or its CEO, I'm not going to invest." But instead you idiots just keep posting B.S. theories that have a clear negative motive to drive the price down.

You're either shorters or work for the litigants. Either way, try being a little more subtle so you're negative motives aren't as crystal clear.

Anonymous said...

price is going down....price goes down because the supply line of available stock exceeds the demand...

no emotion no spin no hype...a market fact...grow up

Anonymous said...

Anony 9:19.. recognizing price fluctuations is not the same as making up rediculous thories and panic-posts.

Anonymous said...

price is not fluctuating within an average true range....it is trending down week after week for years....wake up

Anonymous said...

jimmbody 701 830 833 930 919 954

Anonymous said...

I don't trust this company or its CEO, I'm not going to invest.

Anonymous said...

jimmbody 1022

Anonymous said...

Slunk....heard GS has withdrew a new patent COES patent about a week ago. Why?

Anonymous said...

Amazing u r the only one that heard this
Loser stop bashing

Anonymous said...

Actually they did. Looking into it and will have it up on the site shortly. That's for heads up - Skunk!

Anonymous said...

Yeah skunk doesn't post under an anonymous moniker actually he has a skunk symbol where the face pic would be. Now I know your full of shit

Anonymous said...

Adding the 517 makes adding the 037 a piece of cake. I can't believe Icm took the bait!

nobody12378 said...

We need some investigation here not invective. Before responding with the typical knee-jerk responses that populate this board, Google "OTC vs. OTO". Why? Since Monday all trades of GERS have been on the "OTC" exchange. The discussion that is found under the above topic on the meaning of "OTO" strongly suggests that OTO means a non reporting .PK (pink sheet) company. Today I found that USAA has classified GERS as .PK company. The investigation that is needed is to determine if GERS has migrated to the pink sheets, if so why, and if so why were we not informed and does this mean that there will be no SEC filing? I can find no confirmation of this on "OTCMarkets.com", but the change in exchange listings for the trades is real, the commentary and the USAA listing disconcerting. Any one with good formation on this please respond.

nobody12378 said...

EC Rule 15c2-11 was designed to allow non-reporting public company's securities to be quoted on The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") by filing some simple disclosures.

Now, companies seeking to obtain a quote on the FINRA OTCBB must be required to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"), as amended, a company who has filed a registered offering with the SEC, such as an S-1 registration statement is required to file reports for one year. A company which files a Form 10 or Form 10-12G becomes a reporting company under Section 12g of the Act and must file reports. To be eligible for a quotation of its securities, the company's market maker must file a Form 211 with the FINRA, the company must have sufficient free trading stock in its public float to allow Rule 15c2-11.

The stated and un-stated listing requirements for the FINRA OTC-BB are as follows:

fully reporting with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
minimum of 40 stockholders of record holding at least 100 shares each (note: this number is informal and has been moving up),
must have a market maker submit 15c2-11 (Form 211) application to FINRA and agree to act as market maker for securities of company.

If you need assistance in having a Form 211 filed with the FINRA so that your company can trade on the OTCBB, we can help prepare that paperwork and introduce you to a market maker. Contact us for more information.

Anonymous said...

looks like a retroactive rule change that ... caused some mms (?) to no longer be able to "piggy back."

Anonymous said...

old amendmment --- disregard

Anonymous said...

one of the greatest jackass investments of all time for idiot loyal longs

Anonymous said...

It will be a great investment.

Anonymous said...

well then heee fukin hawww

Anonymous said...

this pig is greased (no pun intended). when it goes it goes big --- no chasin a gap-up to hQQterville

iMOFO

Anonymous said...

SkunK, where are you? Are you roadkill on the information highway? All you've left us with is reading these idiots bashing each other. Isn't there any news somewhere????

Slashnuts said...

GPRE Reports Record Corn Oil Sales/Volumes!

Despite lower ethanol production, GPRE sold 38.6 million pounds of corn oil in Q2!

Corn oil sales were $15.5M, an increase of $2M over Q112, and $5M compared to Q211.

According to these numbers, GPRE extracted at a rate of .64 pounds per bushel. WoW!$!$

I remember when the deal was first announced, they expected 70-90M pounds a year. GPRE is now at a going rate of 150M, double what was expected. All this at a reduced ethanol production rate of 171 MGY for Q2.

"Corn Oil Production Revenues
$15,470,000"


"During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company sold 38.6 million pounds of corn oil production compared to 21.5 million pounds in the same period of 2011."

Corn Oil Production Segment

"Green Plains initiated corn oil production in the fourth quarter of 2010. By September 30, 2011, corn oil extraction equipment was deployed at all nine of the Company’s ethanol plants. Revenues in the corn oil production segment increased by $5.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in the prior year. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Green Plains sold 38.6 million pounds of corn oil compared to 21.5 million pounds in the same period of 2011."

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1309402/000119312512314730/d385174dex991.htm


I think producers are extracting all they can in this environment.
Corn oil production levels are increasing even with lower ethanol production.
Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

jimmowrey said...

Excellent news Slashnuts!

Anonymous said...

Excellent slash nice to hear from you again bro.

nobody12378 said...

GPRE results mean very little until we understand how/if they translate into GERS revenue. At this time, based upon the previous two quarters, we do not and they do not.

jimmowrey said...

We do know that an increase in revenue from GPRE selling corn oil will result in an increase in revenue for GERS. Unfortunately, we do not know the ratio, or timing. Hopefully, we will learn both soon.

nobody12378 said...

How do we KNOW that? In face of the continued dilution to pay bills and in face of the substantially reduced monthly legal fees, how do we KNOW if any meaningful revenue is coming in? GERS is behaving as if it is not.

jimmowrey said...

We KNOW that GPRE is licensed with GERS. We KNOW that GERS has decided to license COES on a royalty basis. That in itself allows us to KNOW that increased corn oil sales for GPRE will equate to increased revenue for GERS. We do not KNOW the ratio or timing. I expect that we will learn more with the next filing.

Anonymous said...

jimmbody playing with himself again

nobody12378 said...

I am pretty sure that more questions about GERS revenue and its relationship to its licensee's revenue will be raised by the Q2 filing than answered. Time will tell.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure the Q2 filing won't raise as many questions as Nobody's motives with posting about GERS.

Anonymous said...

who's the chicken shit that sold me one (1) share?

Anonymous said...

Hey, Nobody's back! It's sooooo good to have someone take every bit of good news and put a gloomy spin on it. Did ICM get mad at you for taking a vacation from Ihub? Did they cut your pay?

nobody12378 said...

The only news here is that some idiot has not paid attention to the disconnect between GPRE Corn Oil Segment Revenues and GERS revenues. Pay attention, you may learn something.

Slashnuts said...

Corn Oil Yields Expected To Move Higher...

According to todays CC, http://investor.gpreinc.com/eventdetail.cfm corn oil yields can be expected to increase another 15% going forward.

This would put GPRE at about .75 pounds per bushel, which is 50% higher than the best system ICM has to offer (.5 pounds).

Then we have method II, 1.33 pounds. It's clear that GERS has the best technology and producers make more money with GERS even after the royalty.

By the way, you should listen to the CC as GPRE mentions how they may structure the algae oil like they did the corn oil, by paying a royalty for the technology.

One thing's for sure, prices are high and going higher. I think producers will continue to extract as much oil as possible and oil yields will continue to climb even in the face of reduced ethanol production. GERS is in a league of their own with nobody coming close to obtaining the yields they do.

As soon as the transcript is available, I'll post the rest of the corn oil related material from GPRE's CC.

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$

Anonymous said...

I heard total truth owns five million shares now LOL

Anonymous said...

I heard Icm is broke an going to settle out LOL

Anonymous said...

financials show if you must own gers you still have time to pull the trigger..glta

nobody12378 said...

That data has been available for months.

Anonymous said...

sub penny..tortue stock...nightmare

Anonymous said...

Stocklearner loser death

Anonymous said...

Slash, no offense but in response to a call for info about GERS, you give us a report on GPRE, which you can argue is related but come on. Kind of like a diversion used by politicians who don't want to talk about the real issues.
In other words, GERS has gone dark. Not a good sign!

Anonymous said...

at least one more long quarter of dilution untill next quarter hope of earnings....this will at least see .005 from here...an other 50% haircut...i see no reason to step up...no hedge fund or institution is touching this junk....nuff said

Anonymous said...

Okay basher go back to yahoo

Anonymous said...

Yawn. Ok Mr millionaire

jimmowrey said...

Anony 11:29 your most intelligent post to date. Speaks volumes LOL

In God We Trust said...

Slashnuts, I really enjoy your posts as you are very knowledgeable and informative. Keep up the great work! GO GERS!!! We got this bud!!!

 
Free Blog CounterTamron