Friday, July 27, 2012

GERS Answers ICM and Others

See HERE

The ICM Defendants’ oil stream coming from its centrifuge is '''''''''''''' '''''''''' ''''' '''''''''''''' '''''''''''' pure oil and their syrup stream is '''''''''' ''''''''''' free of oil. (CleanTech Fact ¶ 4-23)

The undisputed test results unequivocally demonstrate that the ICM Defendants perform the claimed method of recovering oil so that one stream coming from the centrifuge is “substantially oil” while the other stream is “substantially free of oil.”

SkunK
8 Pages longer than previous blog post.
My underline and bold above

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Icm is toast vander griend reputation is in shambles

Anonymous said...

Seriosuly, no way we're not winning this case.
Just read the entire document, GERS's lawyers nailed every possiblity of an argument that ICM and the defendants have.

My favorite part is how they show that not only do the patent-in-suit NOT limit the rate of substantially free of oil, but they point out several times that the ICM defendants completely avoid refference to the substantially oil stream; both required and used by all the defendants, and in clear infringment of the patents.

They also used a mathematical comparison that was awesome, they wrote:
"It would not matter if the percentage of oil actually present in the de-oiled syrup stream exiting the centrifuge is 1%, 5%, 20% or 50%.
The only thing that matters to the ICM Defendants is whether at least 95% of the oil in the concentrate is recovered in the oil stream. According to the ICM Defendants, a stream exiting the centrifuge that contains only 1% oil cannot be considered “substantially free of oil” if less than 95% of the originally present oil is recovered by the centrifuge."

BOOM- GERS is winning this one, no doubt.
GLTA!

Anonymous said...

none helps the pps..it is in 5 year downtrend....you are right but wrong as well...lousey investment amoung the biggest ever

Anonymous said...

Icm is like a cockroach scavaging around for any piece of defense they can find. When the lights turn on they scatter like the scum of the earth they are.

Griend is a maggot

Anonymous said...

the best? one of the best? patent firms in the country says what? "unequivocally demonstrate that the [ ] Defendants perform the claimed method [ ] ?

holy smackers, i am buying more shares!

Anonymous said...

I'm buying more to. Lawyers don't take contingency cases less they KNOW they'll WIN.

 
Free Blog CounterTamron