Thursday, September 29, 2011

New Filing on Discovery

See Here

SkunK

The number one thing on the GreenShift agenda is to discuss: 

1) The propriety of Defendants’ failure to produce discoverable documents obtained from third parties prior to the deposition of Mr. Cantrell.
*******************
It appears to the SkunK that the General Counsel of ICM was aware of holding back information from the court - and that it was simply part of the ICM plan.

Here is an ICM statement from a PR in August "There is substantial evidence not before the USPTO and not yet presented to the federal courts that impacts the validity of the GreenShift patents."

The Skunk's first reaction when he read the statement above was:  "Your holding back evidence during discovery and you are announcing it to the world in a press release?"  Maybe that is common?  It seems a bit unusual to me?  But then again I am not a lawyer.

11 comments:

Skribe said...

Thank's for always providing us with the info!

Skribe said...

Thank's for always providing us with the info!

Anonymous said...

Thanks Skunk. So, IBEC pulls some document out of thin air and surprises Cantrell with it. Cantrell attorney advises him not to answer questions until they've had a chance to discuss it in advance. GERS also goes on the offensive asking for a log of when this doc was made known to IBEC. Are they playing fair?? Wonder what it is?? IBEC is the infringer that we have asked for injunction.
Also, wonder what that last entry is #7 about. Sounds like GERS asking for revised schedule(pushing it out) given status of markman and state of discovery.

Skribe said...

Impeachment?

Anonymous said...

Skunk! wake up, its Ollie. Markman ruling is out. Looks good skunk, real good.

nobody123789 said...

Three out of four ain't bad in any walk of life, but does it cut it here? How does the infringement suit hang on the Court taking the defendants' position on the meaning of "concentrate" instead of GERS position? The Court taking GERS position on the meaning of "mechanical processing" seems very important but does the loss of the first claim term eviscerate the value of the others? I suspect we will soon find out; if a motion for a preliminary injunction follows soon.

nobody123789 said...

No R/S today, last of Q3. Looks like KK is waiting for something; perhaps a preliminary injunction?

Anonymous said...

this is the hoped for out come to the hearing...i feel some relief ...of course how will KK engineer the R/S without causing collapsing price is my immediate concern as a deeply long holder
larry

Anonymous said...

Early Q-10!

Anonymous said...

3 q is not even over till the end of the month. How can it already be out?

nobody123789 said...

What the heck, more dilution; the tell-tale 25% discount:

$0.0001 43,392,999 OBB 16:07:04
$0.0000 11,000,000 OBB 16:06:39

 
Free Blog CounterTamron