Wednesday, June 29, 2011

NOA Follow up

Here is some SkunK-search that seems to support the recent GreenShift PR:


Notice of Allowance Form

SkunK

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh I get it. They asked the patent office to review January's allowed patent. The patent office reviewed it again along with all the infringers arguements. They reissued the patent even after consideration of the defenses claims of being invalid.

Anonymous said...

Did ya see that big fat buy of 35 mili at t02? 7 g's!

nobody123789 said...

Did you see the 30 mili sale at 0.0001?

Anonymous said...

to2 buy was twice the dollar amount

Chopin said...

Good strategy; Use the same "asleep at the wheel" patent examiner who incorrectly allowed original patents to rubber stamp additional prior art as not relevant. This leads to the appearance of a strong patent position, but it all hinges on one examiner not reading anything before reissuing.

Anonymous said...

Nice wild swing Chopin. Skunk anticipated your baseless criticizem over a year ago.

http://greenshift-gers.blogspot.com/2010/05/experienced-primary-examiners.html

He gives you the references that shows not only does Ms. Carr have over 20 years experience with over a thousand patents, the GreenShift stable of patents are based on the work of multiple patent exaiminers.

Now don't just be basher lazy and say the Skunk is biased. Like I said, he gave you the references with the links. Research it yourself.

 
Free Blog CounterTamron