Friday, October 15, 2010

Resources for Flottweg Litigation

LAWSUIT
************************
Order on Pretrial Deadlines:
Motions to Dismiss due on 01/14/2011.
Amended Pleadings due by 12/13/2010;
Discovery due by 4/15/2011;
Dispositive Motions due by 5/15/2011.
See Here

PATENT
*************************
Here are 17 Flottweg Patents being applied for.

Here is the 11/604,435 application filed by Flottweg on 27 November 2007.
Filed  27 November 2007.  This is the one that was REJECTED due to prior art and being obvious.

Here is Flottweg's stable of 30 patents going back almost 35 years.  Only the top four were awarded within the last 5 years.
*************************

SkunK
This is a big deal. The reason this is important is we have the combined pretrial coming up a week from Monday. Is this the crutch being kicked out from the infringers defense? I would think that all Flottweg customers may have quite a weekend reassessing their position. I have heard numbers that there may be as many as 40 infringers, yet we have less than half of that under litigation. Are some of those direct Flottweg customers? If they thought this rejected patent would protect them from an infringing lawsuit, I guess they need to reassess. This may open the floodgates to go after the Flottweg customers who have been infringing - since until this patent was rejected the issue would have been clouded by a pending patent. NO LONGER. People have been asking me: "Whats going on with the pps?" Is this the reason? No idea, but the timing is self-evident. I do expect that between the upcoming pretrial and the throwing out of this basic Flottweg patent - it has definitely escalated the pressure on infringers to settle.

6 comments:

Slashnuts said...

!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$$!!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$$!$!$!$$!$!$$!$!$!$$!$!$!$!$!$$!$$!!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$!$$!$!$$!$!$!$$!$$!$!$$!$!$$!$$!$$!$!$!$!$$$!$$!$!$$!$$!$!$$!!$!$!$!$$!$!$$!$!$!$$!!$!$!$$!$$!$$!$!$!$$!$$!$!$!!$$!$!$!$!$!$$!$!$!$!$$!$!$!$$!$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$!!$$!!$$$!!$$$$!!$$!!!!$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Anonymous said...

Used to be whenever skunk published something that highlighted how weak ICM's and the other infringers position were, posters would run to ICM's defense saying how misguided and uninformed he was. He just did not understand the history of the ethanol industry. Where are they now? I bet all huddled in "the" Kansas Motel6 trying to get Greenshift on the speaker phone so they can settle? lolololololo
Big Easy

Anonymous said...

Huddled in "the" Motel six? Are you trying to say there is only one in Kansas? I would think there is one at BOTH exits. ICM is on the ropes hahahah

Go Cornhuskers!

Anonymous said...

All infringers please form a single file line in front of the settlement counter.

Yes, Tricanter is covered by the patents.

Anonymous said...

"The Original SkunK estimate of $12.50 in the poll below was based on 200m shares and was done in FEB of 2007 for a future date of FEB of 2010. I believe The equivalant Market Cap at 10B of today's shares would be 25cents. No, I didn't predict the global market credit collaspe - :~)"
Hi Skunk, could you update your estimate?

Slashnuts said...

This is really big news! It's the silver bullet right through the heart of the defense. No wonder GPRE signed with GERS.


“The means or device for recovering oil [taught by GreenShift in its patent application] … may comprise any suitable device for separating oil from a mixture, such as a gravity separator (which advantageously requires no additional energy input to effect separation and, thus, further enhances efficiency), a centrifuge, a disk-stack centrifuge, a centrifugal decanter, or an evaporator. … Moreover, in addition to a self-cleaning bowl type centrifuge as the means for recovering oil from the thin stillage, a nozzle bowl disk stack centrifuge would work, as could a horizontal centrifugal three phase decanter.”

 
Free Blog CounterTamron