*Summary Judgement* 230+ pages
Skunk's SJ Highlights copy/pasted 2+ pages
Discharging Order to show cause
Defendant's Testimony
SkunK
Friday, November 14, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
10 comments:
Way too many factual components that form the basis of the SJ for the Appellate Court to over rule all of them. Violation of the on-sale bar appears not be that important, if at all. The last paragraph describing GERS behavior is most disturbing. This almost tantamount to the judge rejecting GERS' claims with prejudice. The Appellate Court will NOT over turn this. The patents are worthless, they are the basis of this company, therefore the company is worthless. Make your own judgement about the value of the stock.
Put another way, the chance of a successful appeal is about the same as GERS' share price expressed as a percentage.
Farewell, trolls.
If people can read and/or if folks are still paying attention, the PPS should disappear today as folks scramble to get out. That exit portal is very narrow. With no one buying and dilution no longer an option how can the company pay its bill and survive? How long before GPRE and others terminate their licenses? Rally, how long to BK?
they will win on appeal... Most of this will be overturned. I expect a jury trial to be the end result. A jury and/or appellate judge will see thru the science which this judge obviously could not. I think this was well over his head...
"Most of this will be overturned". Unfortunately, all of it will have to be overturned for the SJ not to stand. It is now a pipe-dream that GERS will prevail at the Appellate level; the consequences of not doing so are obvious to any who care and/or pay attention.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-12/duke-energy-wins-verdict-reversal-in-epa-lawsuit-over-indiana-power-plants.html
The appeals court also said that U.S. District Judge Larry J. McKinney, who presided over the trial in Indianapolis, improperly admitted expert testimony proffered by the EPA.
http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-court-decisions---sept-4---17-2013/PARAMS/article/32442
Judge Larry McKinney of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted summary judgment in favor of SPX on all claims, but the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed.
http://www.woodmclaw.com/attorney/douglas-b-king
After the defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted, and then reversed on the plaintiff’s appeal to the U.S.C.A. for the 7th Circuit (¶ 23 on the case list of published decisions), the case was remanded for trial to Larry McKinney
http://www.cafcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Centillion-Data-Sys.-LLC-V.-Qwest-Commc%E2%80%99ns.-Int%E2%80%99l-Inc.1.pdf
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Indiana in Nos. 04-CV-0073 and 04-
CV-2076, Judge Larry J. McKinney.
"Because we reverse the summary judgment of noninfringement
with respect to eBC, we vacate the district
court’s award of costs to Qwest."
http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2013/D04-15/C:12-2255:J:Williams:aut:T:fnOp:N:1118572:S:0
Apr 15, 2013 ... 1:10-cv-00765―Judge Larry J. McKinney erred, ... So we reverse the summary judgment
Post a Comment