Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Defendant's Reply to the Ink Mystery

See Here
SkunK

9 comments:

  1. I find the defendants argument compelling. Any one right thinking person would be willing to commit a criminal act (forgery) and risk going to jail in order to substantiate a point that does not need substantiation. I say this in jest to point out that many of these maneuvers were witnessing are not for the now but to establish bases (plural) for the inevitable appeals (plural) that will follow. I also say this in jest to emphasize the very long road still ahead until money changes hands and dilution is ended and the PPS stops falling. And that isn't funny at all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. n0b0dy crying all day lost money cant trade time to give up back to dunking donuhts

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would describe this gibberish as "infantile" but that would be a derogatory and defamatory statement to infants.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This nobody lost a SHITLOAD of money hahaha posting 24/7 has no life since losing his house and moving to his parrents basement. Sad real sad story

    ReplyDelete
  5. sofriginrite,

    if i read it rite, alll experts agree it was ready for patenting august 1.

    what do you think about that?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well you cannot mean the experts at the United States Patent Office and certainly not the Inventors or the GreenShift team of Experts.

    So by "all experts" you must be referring to those bought and paid for by the defense. Hahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  7. All of ICM defense experts are outstanding in their field. No really, they found them out standing in their turnip fields checking their opossum traps

    ReplyDelete
  8. eckhoff os plaintiffs expert (@ p80)

    ReplyDelete
  9. "There are two sides to every coin" ... but the problem is that nowadays both sides are fake {as in NOT real silver}.

    ReplyDelete