Thursday, December 27, 2012

Poet Insider

We continued expansion of corn oil production and are now producing it at 25 POET locations with more to follow.

See Here

SkunK

123 comments:

  1. Can't wait to sue poets infringing non patented ass.
    I know nobody more litigation blah blah blah

    ReplyDelete
  2. The issue is not the additional litigation that KK has stated in writing is coming. The issue is not the protracted loss of revenue and impact on GERS' bottom line and on its desirability as an investment. The issue is not the continued dilution required to pay for this next adventure. The issue is not that Poet dwarfs ICM in terms of resources and therefore in its capacity to put up an extended litigious battle. These are issues but not the major issue.

    The major issue is why cannot GERS convince many of the other corn oil producers to adopt their technology? These folks are not stupid, they are not operating on the basis of intransigence as ICM is; they are operating solely on what they believe is best for their bottom line. If GERS' COES significantly out performs these other technologies, then why are they not rushing to license? There is more here than we know.

    ReplyDelete
  3. basically, Poet is installing COES system network wide....With impunity and zero concern for GERS legally...

    According to fundementalists here, every gers method is inclusive to all other competing methods...So now Poet is an infringer

    ReplyDelete
  4. seems skunk and slash have not factored in POET resourcefullness

    ReplyDelete
  5. gers will never prevail...there is no justice...for sure gers will never get a cent even if they prevail

    ReplyDelete
  6. i guess slash and skunk like pumping?

    ReplyDelete
  7. wow,,,someone should have just stolen the light bulb invention...all those opportunities over the millenia to get rich from other peoples ideas...at last it all comes together at gers's expense...anarchy!

    ReplyDelete
  8. read the intro here...loks like skunk and slash have dirty shoes plus in before the herd....

    ReplyDelete
  9. i have seen scam stocks hit 2 billion market caps...eg sulphco hit almost 20 dollars one day...then plummeted....could happen right here...

    ReplyDelete
  10. nobodys sun is playing at the local circus, gave him 4 shares of gers and wished him happy kwanza

    ReplyDelete
  11. The geniuses on this site that "claim" to have had the vision to buy into GERS at a penny, better be ready to claim their profits before they vaporize.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ^^^arnt u jealous kido?

    ReplyDelete
  13. ^ learn how to trade sucker

    ReplyDelete
  14. GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN

    ReplyDelete
  15. You think DVG is an obstinate adversary, he's a little girl compared to Broin. And slash and others still haven't responded to my concern that POET rejection actually gives them a defense against infringement claims- it was rejected because it was not novel, not because it was infringing.

    -squeezer

    ReplyDelete
  16. Trade -- for a few pennies? Where is the juice in that? Stick to the side lines where the secondary acts are staged.

    ReplyDelete
  17. hahah sucker how much did u lose so far?????????????

    ReplyDelete
  18. sounds like youre a big loser in life haHAhahahahHAHAHAH

    ReplyDelete
  19. Not a dime. In fact this interlude has allowed me to average down -- difference, I know that there will not be a pot of gold around the corner. Fortunately, I am not in need of a few shekels to give my life meaning.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Oh, by the way there are still a few $1 black jack tables left in downtown Las Vegas for you penny flipping folks that think a few grand is a big day at the office.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Who knows if POET is saying they are a GERS infringer....They say they have 25 Coes on line...Is the assumption that they are infringinging on GERS method?

    ReplyDelete
  22. POET's COES uses a centrifuge so I would say they are infringing. I just have two fears: 1. POET's more stubborn and deeper pockets than ICM, 2. POET's patent rejection was because it wasn't novel- not patentable. How does something that's not patentable infringe on a patent?

    -squeezer

    ReplyDelete
  23. So they prefer to use a poor unpatentable knockoff of their own devise....interesting...they choose control of their factories over greater profits/share model with gers...

    ReplyDelete
  24. so funny saw nobodys wife at the $1 blackjack tables last night she said she just got out of her job at the strip club because nobody doesnt know how to trade HAHAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anony 10:00

    Do you really believe a for-profit company driven only by the bottom line, that is not intransigent (i.e DVG) would make such a decision? You must start to question the assumptions built into to your query -- that GERS technology is a good as we have been told.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Nobody,

    i am questioning that assumption

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous Anonymous said...

    so funny saw nobodys wife at the $1 blackjack tables last night she said she just got out of her job at the strip club because nobody doesnt know how to trade HAHAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  28. ^^^^LOLOLOL
    nnobody such a joke what a tool

    ReplyDelete
  29. I wonder how the Chorus is going to spin the Poet information? I suspect we will here that Poet really is going to sign with GERS; that has been the spin on REX, PEIX and others. I they are silent, perhaps they too have lost some steam.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Blogger nobody12378 said...

    I wonder how the Chorus is going to spin the Poet information? I suspect we will here that Poet really is going to sign with GERS; that has been the spin on REX, PEIX and others. I they are silent, perhaps they too have lost some steam.




    HAHAHAHAHAHAA he said "here" what a toolbag

    ReplyDelete
  31. Well what does the POET information mean?

    They saw no business pressure to use GERS method?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Getting Poet using GERS method would have sent GERS to a dollar...Now the game of legal intrigue just keeps the GERS outcome a malingering cancer on all investors...

    ReplyDelete
  33. It would help discourse if the various "Anonys", that appear to be willing to objectively discuss GERS, would get handles so that others would know what part of the discussion they are weighing in on. It would help continuity.

    ReplyDelete
  34. poet, like nobody, extracts edible oil from the front end.

    ReplyDelete
  35. does this price move imply THAT Poet Is in fact using GERS technology...if so this thing is easily one dolla!

    ReplyDelete
  36. POET ISNT NOVEL CAUSE GERS OWNS THE PATENTS

    ReplyDelete
  37. nobody pooped his diaper.....up 20%++

    ReplyDelete
  38. Kind a hard to patent whats already patented

    ReplyDelete
  39. NOT NOVEL MEANS UNPATENTABLE CAUSE GERS PATENTED IT
    POOR POET NOTHING NEW

    ReplyDelete
  40. Is Spring here already? I see green everywhere!

    ReplyDelete
  41. So is it agreed...Poet is then also an infringer of the GERS method?

    ReplyDelete
  42. Pal this board is a dysfunctional retards site....They have NO IDEA if GERS is being infringed by POET...none

    ReplyDelete
  43. Is poet licensed andd we dont know it?

    ReplyDelete
  44. GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN

    ReplyDelete
  45. one dolla stock with POET paying gers royalty!...legal costs covered and profits on top of that...glta long suffering

    ReplyDelete
  46. notice he didnt call it patent pending anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  47. POET uses a process that does not include heat to extract oil, plus they add enzymes. The current litigation should clear up whether they are infringing or not.

    ReplyDelete
  48. http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/2a2b/internal/121410lcfs-cornoil-bd-sup.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  49. POET uses a process that does not include heat to make ethanol. POET uses heat to extract oil.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Holy shit someone just bought a million shares!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Holy shit someone just bought a million shares!

    ReplyDelete
  52. Holy shit someone just bought a million shares!

    ReplyDelete
  53. That would be me. 16 ounces, big woop

    ReplyDelete
  54. http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/2a2b/internal/121410lcfs-cornoil-bd-sup.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  55. nobody sad he didnt buy under penny HAHAHAAHAHHAHA amateur

    ReplyDelete
  56. GreenShift’s patent-pending COES II is used to free additional oil from the wet cake so that it is
    able to exit with the thin stillage for final recovery via COES I. As more than 40 percent of the
    total oil within the corn is trapped within the wet cake, GreenShift developed a washing
    PRELIMINARY DRAFT – DISTIBUTED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
    25
    technique to free this oil from the cake so that it is recoverable by the already proven COES I.
    The COES I recovery system is not inhibited by oil volumetric flow rate and therefore no
    adjustments or additional hardware would be required by COES I to recover higher
    concentrations of oil.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Any one yet consider how a million share buy, 2% of the stated outstanding shares, could only have budged the PPS? If you did you might have considered that your equity just dropped by 2% because that was a trade of new shares (dilution). Happy days are here again ...

    ReplyDelete
  58. if this poet thing is actually gers freindly(unproven yet)...then the gers should start to have gaps up in the premarket trading beginning as early as next week...

    ReplyDelete
  59. That is a wild rumor created on this board. The IF and BUTS are superfluous.

    ReplyDelete
  60. no evidence of dilution yet today...

    lets say no dilution, then what are we witnessing...?...rapid accumulation?...people selling their underwater shares for tax reasons and another entity snapping them up...perfectly legal

    ReplyDelete
  61. uh oh more icm layoffs

    ReplyDelete
  62. notice he doesnt call it patent pending anymore?

    ReplyDelete
  63. Nobody said he is superflous because he is a iffy butt.

    ReplyDelete
  64. hahaha nobody dont know hoe to trade what a tard hahahahahaha
    SUCKER


    p.s. GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN

    ReplyDelete
  65. What royalty Poet gets for its patent?

    ReplyDelete
  66. poet gets nobodys mom

    ReplyDelete
  67. panic in infringerland

    infringers not happy judge speeding this up

    ReplyDelete
  68. yes but POET is clearly willing to infringe and install their own devices.....

    ReplyDelete
  69. dvg knows hes lost hes laying off good people

    ReplyDelete
  70. Of coarse I can agree with that 210.

    ReplyDelete
  71. i agree with Nobody 1234,
    It concerns me that this late in the game POET is willing to openly infringe on the GERS patented methods and skip paying royalties....the court is toothless....

    ReplyDelete
  72. toothless like some of you say is Nobodies mother/////lol

    ReplyDelete
  73. wow infringers having trouble finding experts...not good

    ReplyDelete
  74. THIS IS SO FREAKING EXCITING!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  75. According to ICM their last layoffs were in October. Any one have documentation that more have occurred since then, or as usual, are folks pandering old news?

    ReplyDelete
  76. INFRINGERS BUYING STOCK IN A PANIC FRNZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  77. ITS A INFRINGER STOCK BUYING ORGY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  78. noboyds mom laid on ICM hahahahah
    i mean laid by

    ReplyDelete
  79. panic in infringerland

    infringers not happy with revised claim construction

    ReplyDelete
  80. Efforts to re-engage with expert
    candidates since the Court’s December 21, 2012 have not yet been successful, and it is unknown
    if the expert candidates, even if available to serve as an expert for Defendants, will be available
    to review materials and prepare an expert report in the shortened time frame set by the Court, in
    view of the intervening holidays. Moreover, even to the extent an expert can be located that is
    2
    available to conduct analysis and develop opinions in the shortened time frame set by the Court,
    material information relevant to that analysis and those opinions is not yet available, namely, the
    District Court’s revised claim construction ruling.

    ReplyDelete
  81. wow case is 3 years old and still no experts for infringers

    ReplyDelete
  82. http://www.kansas.com/2012/10/31/2552301/icm-lays-off-25-more-employees.html - 73k - Cached - Similar pages

    ReplyDelete
  83. 325000 buy ! ask2.9 !

    ReplyDelete
  84. Besides POET, Valero does not think GERS has a foot to stand on. There is also extensive work being done to extract even more corn oil than either Method I or combined Method I and Method II will recover. This technology is a train in motion, cannot be stopped and it does not involve GERS.

    ReplyDelete
  85. That is what I hear...The GERS technology has just been too slow a roll out...Newer novel methods now exist....

    GERS goes to the wastebasket of paper printing Wanabees

    ReplyDelete
  86. what newer novel methods is that?

    ReplyDelete
  87. The basic assumption that there is a shelf life or window of opportunity for each new invention is correct. There is always a better mousetrap. That said, your assertion that this window has closed on GERS is not supported by the companies employing their technology. Their licenses are for GERS' Method I and if GPRE, for example, chose to employ a competing non-infringing technology, they are free to do so. Your assertion is tantamount to stating that GPRE doesn't want to maximize its revenue stream, which is ridiculous. When a better mousetrap for COE is available they will be the first to adopt it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again so why are you invested here if u think its old technology

      Delete
  88. or tantamount to [ a lie].

    ReplyDelete
  89. up early? dipchit donkeyboy 656 1133

    ReplyDelete
  90. so funny saw nobodys wife at the $1 blackjack tables last night she said she just got out of her job at the strip club because nobody doesnt know how to trade HAHAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  91. Does not look good going forward for GERS...These other companies are simply extracting oil with impunity and lack of regard for thre justice system....They know that GERS will NOT survive and ever get a penny out of those infringers....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow your right first thing monday I m gonna sell before I lose everything thanks for the heads up

      Delete
  92. JUST TALKED TO MY SOURCES...looks like nobody is getting fired from ICM and rumor is his daughter had wife have to go back to hookin...man its cold outside

    ReplyDelete
  93. JUST TALKED TO MY SOURCES...looks like nobody is getting fired from ICM and rumor is his daughter had wife have to go back to hookin...man its cold outside

    ReplyDelete
  94. JUST TALKED TO MY SOURCES...looks like nobody is getting fired from ICM and rumor is his daughter had wife have to go back to hookin...man its cold outside

    ReplyDelete
  95. does NOT look good for infringers ..PANICING ..NO expert ..judge speeding this up..reconstructs substantial

    ReplyDelete
  96. does NOT look good for infringers ..PANICING ..NO expert ..judge speeding this up..reconstructs substantial

    ReplyDelete