| 06/30/2020 | 180 | ORDER filed denying [175] petition for en banc rehearing filed by GS Cleantech Corporation and Greenshift Corporation. By: En Banc (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [704540] [JAB] [Entered: 06/30/2020 09:12 AM] |
| 07/07/2020 | 181 | Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [705851] [16-2231, 17-1832, 17-1838] [JAB] [Entered: 07/07/2020 01:21 PM] Order Denying Here Mandate Here SkunK |
I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
Popping the cork at ICM Headquarters today, I would guess. The thieves got away with it. Sucks.
ReplyDeletePut a fork in her!
ReplyDeleteSlash - time for another rambling post about how we must prevail...
Denied June 30th. The most devastating day in the company's already devastating history. You would think you would hear something from management.
ReplyDeleteYou would think.
ReplyDeleteSomething: the litigation is far from over.
ReplyDeleteOutlook: alternative sources of liquidity for all shareholders of record.
KK if that is you (and it sounds like you) we need a little more detail. If that is not KK -- go away -- we have had enough vacuous cheer leading.
ReplyDeletePut a fork in the litigation, IMHO it is over and chasing it further would be a waste of time and money. WHat is going on with the Atas dealings? I think this partnership is our biggest hope.
ReplyDeleteWhat riles me is that, from Kevin on down (and he is supposedly and attorney), there was always a feeling of rush to market, then rush to sell this, then a rush to cover the tracks of some stupid things that were done. Done, IMHO too soon and out of the process. Offer to sell, lost e-mails, bad memories, questionable dates, unclean hands, etc did us in and that is what the courts saw. Like it or not, it all smelled from the neck down. Wisness and Cantrell had no idea what they were doing when it came to taking a patented product to market and guys like ICM knew that there were mistakes being made and stole the patent. We opened the door and they all come in!
Like it our not, this is basically what happened. I have said it for years that Kevin saw the errors and then he tried to make is all correct. Nope!
Anon 7:22 - your facts are in error. We had the facts and the law on our side. The lower court just made some critical mistakes in 2014. Everything else from that point was tainted. We have a few options to correct those mistakes on multiple fronts.
ReplyDeleteAnon 9:41 - Thank you
ReplyDeleteKK,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your responses. Can you elaborate on what the "multiple fronts" are? Also, can I assume that the company will continue to operate in the dark until those options are exhausted?
Thank you.
ReplyDeleteAnon 12:33 - One of those multiple fronts is to file a writ. The filing status effectively blocked all dilution from pre-2008 debt conversions until that debt was eliminated. Stealth mode also cut the feed to our adversaries, who have a history of successfully weaponizing our disclosures against our collective interests. That said, we are primarily focused on alternative sources of liquidity for all shareholders of record. Current filings will be required for that objective to be met.
Very good KK. Thank you for the information. I truly appreciate all of your hard work on the shareholders behalf. Hang in there!
ReplyDeleteOdds Of Supreme Court Writ Better Than En Banc..
ReplyDeleteWrit Of Certiorari, A Ray Of Hope...
Statistically speaking, parties may have a greater shot at having the U.S. Supreme Court grant their cert petition than the Sixth Circuit granting their petition for rehearing en banc.
Quote:
First, the Sixth Circuit rarely grants rehearing en banc. Indeed, while exact statistics are hard to come by, a review of recent years suggests the Sixth Circuit grants rehearing en banc in less than 1% of cases each year. Jan 13, 2020
Odds Of Supreme Court Hearing Case Are Better..
Quote:
"Focusing only on attorney-submitted petitions, the success rate is closer to 6%, a rate that at least offers a ray of hope."
https://supremecourtpress.com/chance_of_success.html
If there were ever a case to be heard by The Supreme Court, it's this travesty-of-justice...
Good Luck To All!$!$
Don't bet on this writ/case being heard, just looking at the odds...
ReplyDelete"When it comes to petitions for writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court gets many, but grants few. The vast majority of petitions are denied. For example, of the 8,241 petitions filed during its 2009 term, the Court granted only 91, or about 1.1 percent. On average, the Court hears from 80 to 150 cases each term."
2009 is no different than 2020...
Did you not look at slash's link to the supreme court website? 2010 the success rate 2.8%. 2014/2.1%, 2015/4.2%, 2016/2.9%, 2017/2.8%. BUT 1/2 of all those were filed by non-attorney's. When filed by attorney's the chance doubles to like 6%.
ReplyDelete6% is better than <1% we got from the 6th circus.