Thursday, March 19, 2015

Discovery

Request Summary

Proposed Order

Discovery Conference

Discovery not Relevant 1447

Defendants want GERS Finances

SkunK

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

“We believe in our intellectual property rights and the system of checks and balances designed to protect those rights, both in the patent office and the courts,” said Kevin Kreisler, GreenShift’s chief executive officer. “We will appeal the Summary Judgment ruling at the appropriate time. In the meantime, we remain focused on growth, innovation and bringing value to our licensees.”


The Notices of Allowances for these applications were issued by the USPTO after a review of a recent Summary Judgment decision and other filings by the defendants in an ongoing infringement action against multiple defendants by GS CleanTech Corporation, a subsidiary of GreenShift. Each of the recently allowed patent applications was examined and considered patentable by a different examiner and after each had considered the Summary Judgment decision.

Anonymous said...

BLAH....BLAH....BLAH>>>>

Stick a fork in it...it's well done.

Anonymous said...

Each of the recently allowed patent applications was examined and considered patentable by a different examiner and after each had considered the Summary Judgment decision.


13/450,997 NOA fee due 3/19/15
13/185,841 NOA fees due 3/24/15
11/908,891 NOA fee due 3/26/15

 
Free Blog CounterTamron