Thursday, December 4, 2014

Feedstuffs on Court Ruling

See Here

SkunK

13 comments:

  1. The court found that the subject patents were invalid and were not infringed by any of the defendants. In ruling the patents invalid, the court cited multiple grounds including: offering the invention for sale more than one year before filing for the patents; that the invention was already the subject of a patent application filed by another party; that the patents were obvious; and that CleanTech had failed to name the correct inventors. The court also found certain claims to be invalid as lacking an adequate written description and as not enabled.

    “This is a significant victory for GEA and for the entire ethanol industry” said Michael Vick, president of GEA Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. “GEA and its co-defendants are committed to honoring any validly issued patent, but we have firmly believed all along that these patents are not valid, and the court agreed with us. We are happy that the industry can now get back to business and contribute to making America energy independent.”

    The defendants’ claim that the patents were procured by fraud before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office was still pending before the court. The defendants intend to pursue all available remedies on this claim.

    Any one still think that all these bases for invalidity of the patents will be overturned by the Appellate Court?

    The fraud claim is most damning for the current and former shareholders. The litigation could not have been prosecuted without their direct support and claims against them as contributors to this "fraud" could follow, as certainly GERS will not have the resources to pay such judgements.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He's threatening himself! What a idiot!

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are kidding right? Are you familiar with the whole idea of a free market society and the idea of incorporation that our system is based on? ?

    Current and former shareholders? You do understand how shares limit your loses to the costs of the shares? Unless I misunderstood what you clearly said you have no business buying any stock, let alone the pinkys.

    ReplyDelete
  4. the government will never let [you] win right or wrong

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am planning on buying in at $10,000. Nobody, stay out of my way. Going whole kernel. Buy low, sell lower. I need a tax write-off.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The judges will never let infringing companies win . I bet you GREENSHIFT will win , you will have no-body

    ReplyDelete
  7. Man-O-Man-O-Man-Alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    This site has gone cold.

    Where is everyone?

    I guess Slashnuts committed to the old round object delivered by a tubular system.

    Anyone else have anything to say on this website, or should we just shut in down?

    Just as GERS may have to shutdown and go by the name of YAGI COES.

    ANYBODY OUT THERE?

    ReplyDelete
  8. of course. sticking around to see who gets shot.

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://www.greenpatentblog.com/2014/12/14/greenshift-loses-across-the-board-in-ethanol-patent-case/

    ReplyDelete
  10. GERS board in turmoil. 4 board members out. Check today's Edgar filings.

    ReplyDelete
  11. So ends the story of Greenshift. Skunk you can write the epitaph if you would. I suspect the fall-out was over doing business the legitimate way,through marketing, instead of following the vendetta to protects daddy's vision.

    ReplyDelete
  12. lol idiot n0b0dy found the court to be dumber than hiss wife. he os dumb basj so long cant even amke moenyl. writ eon same blog for over 3 years like donkley. no wonder you poor.l learn to trade suckaaaaaaaaa

    ReplyDelete