I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
So if this is over like all the scared ICM employees posting on this sight say it is, why would the judge even be concerned with this new ruling? I thought it was over? Appeal will be won, judge made a huge mistake in the SJ ruling. No biggie, happens all the time.
Tomorrow is a VERY big day in GERSland. In fact, it may well represent a view to whether there is any hope left in GERSland.
"The District Court has ordered the parties to show cause by November 6, 2014 as to why the Court should not unseal the entirety of the document for public access."
IF the only issue that caused the judge to rule against GERS in the SJ is violation of the "no-sale bar", GERS should be jumping out of its skin to get that fact into public view. It appears that if the only issue is that perceived violation then we have some reasonable hope of succeeding with the appeal. IF, there are other issues and conditions/violations as well that are described by the judge, we really have no hope of an appeal overriding all of them. So, if GERS argues against release of the full ruling to the public in order to stave off complete collapse its PPS we will know our future -- none.
In EZ Dock v. Schafer the Federal circuit addresses the application of the experimental use exception. It reversed summary judgment based on an invalidating public sale use. The court explained, " The Supreme Court expressly preserved the experimental use or sale negation. The Federal Circuit held that the new "ready for patenting" standard did not affect the experimental use doctrine. Thus, the Supreme Court and this court apply the experimental use negation without conflict with the "ready for patenting" prong of the new on-sale bar test.
So if this is over like all the scared ICM employees posting on this sight say it is, why would the judge even be concerned with this new ruling? I thought it was over? Appeal will be won, judge made a huge mistake in the SJ ruling. No biggie, happens all the time.
ReplyDeleteTomorrow is a VERY big day in GERSland. In fact, it may well represent a view to whether there is any hope left in GERSland.
ReplyDelete"The District Court has ordered the parties to show cause by November 6, 2014 as to why the Court should not unseal the entirety of the document for public access."
IF the only issue that caused the judge to rule against GERS in the SJ is violation of the "no-sale bar", GERS should be jumping out of its skin to get that fact into public view. It appears that if the only issue is that perceived violation then we have some reasonable hope of succeeding with the appeal. IF, there are other issues and conditions/violations as well that are described by the judge, we really have no hope of an appeal overriding all of them. So, if GERS argues against release of the full ruling to the public in order to stave off complete collapse its PPS we will know our future -- none.
0.0015 ▲ 0.0001 (7.14%)
ReplyDeleteVolume: 1,290,581
In EZ Dock v. Schafer the Federal circuit addresses the application of the experimental use exception. It reversed summary judgment based on an invalidating public sale use. The court explained, " The Supreme Court expressly preserved the experimental use or sale negation. The Federal Circuit held that the new "ready for patenting" standard did not affect the experimental use doctrine. Thus, the Supreme Court and this court apply the experimental use negation without conflict with the "ready for patenting" prong of the new on-sale bar test.
ReplyDeleteHope that they do not drop the ball. GERS has until November 21, 2014 to file the appeal. If they do not the SJ stands.
ReplyDelete0.0016 ▲ 0.0002 (14.29%)
ReplyDeleteVolume: 1,518,585
I only wish that you investors knew what those of us in the industry know about this company. You would have never invested a penny in this company.
ReplyDeleteGood luck to all!
The sad thing about the 6 million share dump is that is was only worth $7500. Toilet paper might be more expensive.
ReplyDeleteso wheres the barlage report and 2003 diagram?
ReplyDelete