Based on its review and representations made in the cover letters, the court determines that substantially all of the documents may be withheld from production because they are attorney-client privileged communications or because they do not fall within the scope of documents to be produced under the court’s June 30 Supplemental Order.
See Here
SkunK
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
22 comments:
Another preliminary deposition today, four years into this morass, we are still gathering basic information? Any one still not understand how the David vs. Goliath tactics are not working in favor of Goliath? They sure are not working in our, the common shareholders, favor.
Didn't you realize that 9 years ago?
What a fool.
A 300,000 share BUY, about 0.6% of the outstanding common shares at the ASK, and the ASK does not budge. This tells us how deep the pool of shares YAGI has ready for sale, and why the PPS cannot move up in these conditions.
Icm donkey^^^
Even donkeys know to seek shelter during hail storms.
hee haw^^^
Your level of intelligent responses is indicative of the IQ of GERS' worshipers.
Icm jackass^^^
Oct 2003 1:20
Dec 2007 1:50
Jul 2010 1:10
Nov 2011 1:1000
Apr 2014 1:100
Soon? 1:10
20 x 50 x 10 x 1000 x 10 = 100,000,000. Yes, 100 million!
To address the question, without R/Ss the PPS would be 0.00000000005.
OR the 30 cents a share prior to the first R/S is equivalent to $30,000,000 a share today. (You can see why some longs have no hope -- the just witnessed 1.1 million YAGI dump doesn't instill much hope that any news can fight against this toxicity to move the PPS forward).
The next R/S should be announced prior to filing the Q3 in November. That will be the shortest interval ever between reverse splits. The rationale; maintaining the OTCQB listing. I have heard, however, that R/S cannot be used to maintain the BID above a penny for the OTCQB. Can anyone confirm this?
Icm jackass confirmed^^^
how is your delisting going?
20% yield loss & too pricey.
•Zero Starch Losses as compared to front end methods
•No negative impact on the front of the plant
Once the oil has been washed into the thin stillage stream, the highly efficient COES I system will extract the additional oil to allow about 75% (1.5#) of the oil entering the facility to be extracted.
COES I recovers oil from the Thin Stillage Stream
COES II relocates oil from the Wet Cake Stream to that of the Thin Stillage Stream where it is recovered by the COES I system
•Zero Starch Losses as compared to front end methods
•No negative impact on the front of the plant
Syrup
About 50% of the Corn Oil is within this stream
Or about, 1 Lbs per Bushel
Wet Distillers Grain (WDG)
About 50% of the Corn Oil is within this Stream
Or about, 1 Lbs per Bushel
How do we recover the remaining oil that is within the WDG?
While oil can be efficiently recovered from the thin stillage stream , we know that a considerable amount of oil bypasses the extraction system and exists within the WDG, or about 50% of the total oil that entered the facility.
To recover this oil, a Washing Technique is used where about 50 to 70% of the oil in the WDG is washed out of the wet cake and into the thin stillage stream.
Thank you.
No Model II's have been installed.
Calgren has agreed to install GreenShift’s first Method II Corn Oil Extraction System to extract corn oil from Calgren’s whole stillage. With Method I (thin stillage extraction) and Method II (whole stillage extraction),
That "information" is at least two years old.
You're over date then bij 7 years?
Doesn't matter pea brain.
Anonymous said...
No Model II's have been installed.
August 24, 2014 at 9:11 AM
Calgren has agreed to install GreenShift’s first Method II Corn Oil Extraction System to extract corn oil from Calgren’s whole stillage. With Method I (thin stillage extraction) and Method II (whole stillage extraction),
After more then 9 years one indeed could state that his brain shriveled to the size of a pea.
All in my honest opinion of his flooding.
Post a Comment