Friday, May 16, 2014

Lions and Taggers

About those Tag-alongs . . see here

SkunK

Will the Q be on Friday or Monday?  What will that mean?

89 comments:

  1. Sunoco operates the Philadelphia refinery and still owns a 30% interest. Carlyle is not that dumb to try to go it alone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. lol n0b0dy crying all day on boards, get job bad tradre learn to rade then amke monies

    ReplyDelete
  3. How could the PR be misleading if a Greenshift spokesmen would have made a small mistake on a point that is totally moot. Further more your prostrating lack of intelligence combined with your daily frustration called GERS makes you a laughingstock.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Everyone misses the real news.

    "as well as adding a different level of professionalism to the industry"

    That is where GERS takes a legitimate shot at the lack of professionalism in the ethanol industry that would allow them to think icm AND OTHERS can violate the PATENT LAWS of the federal government with impunity.

    ICM cronies used to post here saying how greenshift was naïve and did not understand the history and who ran the ethanol industry. Well now ICM is getting their butt kicked in court.

    Who saw that coming? I did.

    Big Easy

    ReplyDelete
  5. GreenShift Turns Profitable!$!$!$!$

    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1269127/000109690614000706/greenshift.htm

    Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$

    ReplyDelete
  6. Slash, how can you ignore the massive dilution (33%) that occurred in a few short weeks, and that there are no earnings per share?

    ReplyDelete
  7. What do you mean by ignore, do you wish he commented on that? What is massive in dollar amounts? Do you have a problem with going from a loss per share to break even per share? Are there any more reasons why not to support their cause in this stock 9 years ago or to provide capital now? Do you have an issue with people who don't have the same perspective as you?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Does 20% of the industry that GERS now has licensed = 40 plants, up 8 more plants from just two months back?

    ReplyDelete
  9. GERS just sent a direct message to the cluster of defendants by ASKING the Court to prolong the time parties are required to comply to case development. Message: "We are in for the duration, however long it takes!" I'm sure that chokes up the defendants, who are blowing bubbles financially due to defective processes and excessive LEGAL COSTS that they now KNOW ICM will not indemnify. I expect heads to roll; and soon, as the Boards meet and say "WTF were you thinking?" MOO There are about 30 companies with VERY Ticked Off Board Members; also in my own opinion! DHOLE

    ReplyDelete
  10. OMG, just stopped by to see what was happening, but I see it is still the same crap as before. I don't know which was worse, loosing a lot of money, or listening to that self-proclaimed "GERS GOD" Nobody continue with the same dribble hour after hour 24/7.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The next dilution bolus should drive us sub penny, which likely means that we will be delisted before the end of summer. If we get delisted will people still be willing to fund their cash needs through purchase of common stock? If not, BK may be the only option for them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Got that wrong -- not self-proclaimed.

    ReplyDelete
  13. lol n0b0dy crying all day on boards, get job bad tradre learn to rade then amke monies

    ReplyDelete
  14. GERS' Licensee Corn LP Reports, Production Soars...

    http://www.cornlp.com/Newsletters/April2014.pdf

    "It’s almost an
    understatement
    to say our plant is
    running very well.
    While CORN, LP
    is a 50-million-gallon-
    per-year plant,
    we’ve been making
    66 million gallons
    annualized lately.
    Each day we’ve been producing
    184,000 gallons of denatured ethanol.
    That’s up significantly from when
    we were a coal-fired plant producing
    174,000 to 178,000 gallons per day.
    Since we made the switch to natural
    gas in August of 2013, the transition
    has been very smooth.
    Another reason we’ve been so productive
    is our decision to postpone April’s
    major maintenance shutdown. Instead,
    we’re doing “mini shutdowns,” where
    we shut off certain parts of the plant
    so we can work on the equipment but
    still keep operating.

    Q: How much corn oil does CORN, LP produce?
    A: We average 5,150 gallons (40,000 pounds) of oil per day.
    That equates to 0.63 pounds of oil per bushel of corn. Our
    product goes to biodiesel plants or is sent to Manly, IA,
    where it’s loaded on to railcars and shipped out. Our storage
    capacity is 3.5 trucks. Current price formulas for corn oil
    are based off of choice white grease, heating oil, or soybean
    oil. Current prices are 82% to 85% of soybean oil, which is
    35 to 36 cents per pound.


    Corn LP/Greenshift License Link...
    http://www.americanfuels.net/2010/10/corn-lp-to-license-greenshift-corn-oil.html

    "Brad Davis, General Manager of Corn, LP said that “We have set a number of new performance records at Corn, LP within the past year, with record levels of ethanol and DDGS production from our plant as well as improved operating efficiencies. We are confident that the addition of GreenShift’s patented corn oil extraction processes to our facility will help us build on our successes with additional improvements in efficiency and profitability.”

    Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$!$

    ReplyDelete
  15. GERS' Licensee United Ethanol Reports...

    In January, the dryer at United Ethanol caught on fire.
    The plant has been operating at 55% capacity since.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQaTtfTqaoE

    The good news is the new dryer is nearly complete and expected to start up in early June. GERS reported a profit despite their licensee operating at 1/2 capacity.

    The best news is, there were no injuries. Also, United ethanol is finishing another project besides the dryer. They installed a 4th fermenter which should increase production by 33%! More production means more corn oil!


    United Ethanol May 2014 Newsletter

    http://www.unitedethanol.com/images/E0135601/UEMay2014NewsletterforWeb.pdf
    click here to see the new dryer and fermentation tank.


    "Through the first quarter of 2014, United Ethanol
    produced 7,688,770 gallons of un-denatured ethanol.
    We also produced 4,434 tons of dry distiller’s grain,
    46,617 tons of wet distiller’s grain, 15,744 tons of
    liquefied carbon dioxide, and extracted 1,678,121
    pounds of corn oil."


    Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$

    ReplyDelete
  16. Nobody, you owe Mr. Davis an apology for the false claim that his statement was misleading. The question is, do you have the character to do so?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Cmon slash we know answer to that.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If you cannot see that it contains a misleading statement then you are blind. Any statement that is in factual error can be misleading. Speaking of character, where is your apology for being responsible for tens of millions in loses by unsuspecting investors who followed your hype. Yet, you continue to put out the same tripe knowing full well it has no impact on the PPS. You should at least provide that disclaimer -- "none of what I am about to describe will positively affect the PPS.". Lets man-up here Slash.

    ReplyDelete
  19. No it is not misleading and he is not blind. You are the one that deliberately mislead.

    How in earth could you could you say sell when you bought? You totally fucked up there. How is that gang of 100 whites doing with with your wife? Kind of feel more in sync with the rest of the posters, what a total deception you are with your massive gaining's from your sub-penny flippng.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Further more Slash and Skunk work as news agencies. They are not responsible for the news, they bring it. You don't contribute but suck. Going on to the next implication, who is responsible for the ten millions off losses? WHAT DO YOU THINK? Of course it's the investor, don't ask so called important questions and harass others while you'r profiteering from their back.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Knowing it has no impact on pps why don't you just fuck up and pimp your cadets on Ihub, Yahoo and the other boards?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Has no impact on pps and tens off millions off losses? Are you backwards?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Any statement that contains an error can be misleading. CAN be. So not is misleading. Get it?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Slash,

    Why do you not have the courage to defend yourself under your moniker instead of doing so anonymously? The froth and sputum we are being inundated with are tell-tale.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Slash,

    Why do you not have the courage to defend yourself under your moniker instead of doing so anonymously? The froth and sputum we are being inundated with are tell-tale.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hey idiot I'M NOT SLASH, JUST ANSWER INSTEAD OF QUESTION ME...

    ReplyDelete
  27. Who is the we you are speaking of? I'm spitting at you!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Your posturing suggests that when I prove you wrong, you will apologize to Mr. Davis. If I don't, you won't. Is this correct?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Your personal interpretation of the word "misleading" is of no interest to me. Any documented statement with a factual error, could be misconstrued and is therefore patently "misleading".

    Now it is time to stop quibbling about your interpretation of a word and focus on the tens of millions of dollars that have been lost since you started your one-sided approach to providing the "GERS' news". However, I know that you cannot do this as your manic, even rabid nature precludes it. My objective record on the other hand, if followed, would have saved many millions and earned many millions more.

    Apologies do not cover the damages you may have created with your lack of objectivity and balance. You can state anything you want about contracts, court action, infringement, corn oil prices, customer revenue, GERS' earnings, GERS' revenue, and whatever and they may be correct or incorrect. But you know full well that until dilution is ended the PPS will only continue to fall; the factors and praises that you extoll are irrelevant to what people invest for in GERS. Not to apprise people of this truth is disingenuous and one-sided.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Follow the link below if you want the whole story about the Sunoco Philadelphia Refinery. You will also find out why the Keystone pipeline is being delayed.

    It has to do with money, unions, politics, railroads / Warren Buffet, Obama, partial monopoly on fuel to the northeast, Sunoco and Carlisle Group..

    ReplyDelete
  31. The LINK.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/carlyle-group-sunoco-and-politicians-joint-venture-to-rescue-philadelphia-refinery/2012/12/21/b71aa998-4879-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html

    ReplyDelete
  32. "The day after Labor Day 2011, Sunoco had announced it would shut down the plant as part of a strategy to exit its refining business, where the company had lost about $800 million over three years."

    ReplyDelete
  33. If Keystone is built, all this crude goes by pipeline, the Philadelphia refinery can no longer compete and shuts down and the railroads (Warren Buffet) lose money.

    But more and more crude oil was leaving the rich Bakken formation in North Dakota by rail. Overall, the nation is transporting more than 1 million barrels a day by rail. And that Bakken crude could travel on the BNSF (Warren Buffet) lines to Chicago, switch to CSX’s network and be delivered right to south Philadelphia. Because cheap new shale gas is replacing coal used by electric power plants, railroads are carrying less coal and looking for new business.

    CSX, which delivers to the Philadelphia refinery, reported in its most recent earnings report that coal shipments in 2012 were down 16 percent from the year before.




    Union Pacific doesn’t ship oil from the Bakken, but it is typical of trends in the rail business. In 2010, crude oil accounted for about 4,400 carloads, company spokesman Tom Lange said. In 2011, it was 25,000 carloads. In 2012, he said, oil could reach 140,000 carloads, or about 90 million barrels of crude — all of it from shale oil formations.


    Brady was trying to get Carlyle help from the administration on EPA permits, but the White House was uneasy about being seen as helping a private-equity firm while the Obama campaign was busy lambasting Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital. Brady contacted Vice President Biden and spoke by phone with Sperling, who said he talked to Obama.

    “The president was in campaign mode banging on Romney for being a hedge fund guy. And here he was helping a hedge fund,” Brady said. “They didn’t want the publicity.” (Both Bain and Carlyle call themselves “alternative asset managers,” not hedge funds.)




    Brady said Pennsylvania’s Republican Gov. Thomas W. Corbett and the White House were also both worried about being blamed by the other if efforts to save the refinery failed.

    Meanwhile, the EPA was bending. To avoid public hearings and requirements of new source review, an existing plant making changes had to balance any emission increase with a decrease in another part of the plant. There is a narrow exception that allows an decrease at a plant to offset an increase at another, but these are designed for adjacent facilities that can’t operate without each other.

    In the end, the EPA said it would allow the Philadelphia refinery to offset anticipated emission increases at that plant — related to Carlyle’s plans to add facilities — with reductions resulting from the closure of Sunoco’s Marcus Hook refinery.

    “There are some big problems with that approach,” said Eric Schaeffer, head of the Environmental Integrity Project and former chief of EPA’s office of civil enforcement.

    The Marcus Hook refinery is 17 miles from south Philadelphia “and the two facilities are not interdependent — obviously, since the Philadelphia refinery will keep running after Marcus Hook closes,” Schaeffer said. Moreover, he added, “reducing emissions of pollutants at a plant 17 miles away will not necessarily offset the increases in air pollution in neighborhoods next to plant.”

    He said the south Philadelphia expansion plan would “include a pretty substantial boost in fine particulates” and that the city’s air quality already falls short of EPA standards.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Mr. Davis' statement is 100% correct, yours is 100% patently false. The sideshow you attempted to create by implying ICM's thievery somehow translates into the bearer of information being at fault is laughable. The blood is on the defendants hands. Your infamous "unsuspecting investor" quote, pioneered on the yahoo board years ago, attempts to hide under the cloak of "caring & protecting" the same group of individuals attacked, bashed and ridiculed in a manner that can only be explained as having a direct relationship to those being brought to justice. Unsubstantiated, false attacks claiming a GERS insider is being misleading by pointing to a document, that when read in it's entirety(beginning with the headline) clearly disproves the failed point you hoped to make, reinforces this.

    The PPS prediction mimics a similar prediction that precluded a forever unverifiable claim of cashing out after a quadrupling of the PPS, which yours truly predicted. Those heading the advise of the blind bashers "no bid" theory would be in the same position today, PPS wise, without the opportunity to do as they pleased after the substantial increase in PPS you claim to have capitalized on.

    Your misinterpretation of the article in question could be interpreted as a lack of ability to comprehend the English language, or an attempt to diminish the strong relationship GERS has with a big oil company. Sunoco, everyday, refines 330,000 barrels in a joint venture with Carlyle.

    All this aside, your attack on Mr. Davis is false, unwarranted, and wrong. Your lack of character is highlighted by your failure to accept your misunderstanding, and apologize to Mr. Davis for claiming his statement about Sunoco being misleading.

    ReplyDelete
  35. 1) Never been on Yahoo
    2) It is LCDR Davis
    3) I'll let the court of public opinion determine if your ravings have cost any one money and who has been more objective over the years.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Now let your lack of character reign supreme by refusing to apologize to Mr. Davis knowing your false claim, and character assassination, have been disproven. Let yourself conjecture onto another topic in an attempt to shift away from the embarrassment of losing this debate.

    "Sunoco owns an approximate 30% non-operating interest in Philadelphia Energy Solutions ("PES"), a joint venture with The Carlyle Group, L.P., which owns a refinery in Philadelphia. Sunoco has a ten-year supply contract for gasoline and diesel produced at the refinery for its retail marketing business."

    http://www.energytransfer.com/ops_other.aspx

    http://www.pes-companies.com/

    "PES is the eighth-largest refiner in the United States and the future energy hub of the Northeast."

    "PES processes approximately 330,000 barrels of crude oil per day, making it the largest oil refining complex on the Eastern seaboard."

    ReplyDelete
  37. The unforeseeable third party contamination of the parties' expectations should void the underlying contract.

    YAGI can go pound sand or chase GERS in court.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Last: 0.025
    Change: +0.0075 (42.86%)
    Bid/Size: 0.0197/10,000
    Ask/Size: 0.025/216,880
    Volume: 1939507
    52 week high: 0.29
    52 week low: 0.01

    ReplyDelete
  39. This public says that every post from nobody is slander and therefore damaging. The losses are even bigger then the invested moneys from the "public"

    ReplyDelete
  40. Last: 0.025
    Change: +0.0075 (42.86%)
    Bid/Size: 0.02/10,000
    Ask/Size: 0.0248/10,000
    Volume: 1939507

    ReplyDelete
  41. Last: 0.025
    Change: +0.0075 (42.86%)
    Bid/Size: 0.022/70,000
    Ask/Size: 0.0248/55,001
    Volume: 1939507

    ReplyDelete
  42. Last: 0.025
    Change: +0.0075 (42.86%)
    Bid/Size: 0.022/10,000
    Ask/Size: 0.0299/24,995
    Volume: 2411816

    ReplyDelete
  43. If you believe that anything stated on a stock bulletin board can in any way affect the PPS you deserve to lose every cent you have gambled here.

    ReplyDelete
  44. of course does moron. its why u bash all day.

    ReplyDelete
  45. If you cannot tell the difference between balanced, objectivity and bashing you again deserve every cent you have gambled here.

    ReplyDelete
  46. of course I can. your a basher

    ReplyDelete
  47. Greenshift Corp. (GERS)
    0.025 ▲ 0.0075 (42.86%)
    Volume: 2,411,847

    ReplyDelete
  48. So how come Slashnuts then is responsible for millions off losses when you state it has no effect on pps?

    You're quite a lying character huh?

    ReplyDelete
  49. cause he's abasher. gets up 5am west coast bashes - 4pm eastern

    ReplyDelete
  50. focus on the tens of millions of dollars that have been lost since you started your one-sided approach to providing the "GERS' news".

    3) I'll let the court of public opinion determine if your ravings have cost any one money and who has been more objective over the years.

    If you believe that anything stated on a stock bulletin board can in any way affect the PPS you deserve to lose every cent you have gambled here.

    see how this Nobody twist and turn as a real snake, ssssss

    ReplyDelete
  51. Simply stated, GERS has attracted many weak-minded gamblers such as yourself that have flocked to the pied-piper of misdirected euphoria.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Robin B. LipinskiMay 22, 2014 at 6:57 PM

    GERS attracted me years ago and it still does today. I am a gambler but definitely not weak-minded, rather I cling to the title - risk taker.

    It was interesting to see the heavy volume today. Some may say,"more dilution from..." but regardless, somebody bought those shares and seemed eager to do so.

    Maybe there is some good news coming? I would not mind reading some good news about GERS.

    ReplyDelete
  53. me too. him too. posts all day, every day. bla bla bla

    ReplyDelete
  54. his ego jacks off on message boards is my 2 cents in this discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Retrospective application of the new OTC .01 rule was unforeseeable, undermines GERS and YAGI plan of operations, disadvantages both parties to the benefit of the other, threatens GERS solvency and renders the underlying contract VOID.

    No more YAGI. No more dilution. Go pound sand or waste money chasing GERS in court.


    iMOFO

    ReplyDelete
  56. If GERS buys back its own stock, is it required to file any forms?

    ReplyDelete
  57. Last: 0.03
    Change: +0.005 (20.00%)
    Bid/Size: 0.02/10,000
    Ask/Size: 0.03/104,900
    Volume: 79989
    52 week high: 0.29
    52 week low: 0.01

    ReplyDelete
  58. Last: 0.03
    Change: +0.005 (20.00%)
    Bid/Size: 0.02/10,000
    Ask/Size: 0.03/14,900
    Volume: 174990

    ReplyDelete
  59. Last: 0.029
    Change: +0.004 (16.00%)
    Bid/Size: 0.02/10,000
    Ask/Size: 0.029/24,473
    Volume: 287757

    ReplyDelete
  60. Sounds Like The New COES is Complete...

    Investor Presentation Highlight's New Oil Extraction System

    GERS' licensee, MGPI, released an investor presentation yesterday.
    On page 12...

    "MGP's new corn oil extraction process creates a higher value by-product with better margins."

    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/835011/000144530514002300/mgpannualstockholdersmee012.jpg

    By calling it their "new" system, I'm assuming they're referring to the Illinois Corn Processors plant which is a joint venture between Seacor Holdings Inc. (CKH) $79.84 -NYSE and
    MGP Ingredients Inc. (MGPI) $6.12 -Nasdaq.

    http://www.greenshift.com/News/item/10
    Here's the recent ICP announcement of the contract GERS won to install the $1M+ system.

    It was stated in the PR the system installation would be completed this Spring.

    GreenShift and Illinois Corn Processing LLC Enter into Installation and License Agreement

    "ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--GreenShift Corporation is pleased to announce that Illinois Corn Processing LLC ("ICP") of Pekin, Illinois, has executed an installation and licensing agreement with GreenShift for its proven Corn Oil Extraction System. ICP is now the thirty-second ethanol plant to license GreenShift's patented technology.

    Under the terms of the agreement, GreenShift will design and construct a new corn oil extraction system, to be completed this Spring, for ICP at its ethanol plant in Pekin. ICP will be using an Alfa Laval Disc Stack Centrifuge for maximum performance and up time of the integrated, automated system. Also included in the licensing agreement will be ongoing technical support provided by GreenShift to maximize the performance and benefits of corn oil extraction for ICP."

    As I discovered 2 months ago, this is MGPI's 2nd license with GERS.

    http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=99664995

    If the installation is complete, will GERS recognize the additional $1M+ in revenue in Q2?

    More importantly, since GERS is now profitable, how much will this contract and the additional royalty's contribute to earnings?

    Could GERS earn a profit of $1M or more in Q214?

    Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$

    ReplyDelete
  61. Last: 0.0289
    Change: +0.0039 (15.60%)
    Bid/Size: 0.025/50,000
    Ask/Size: 0.0289/67,966
    Volume: 331453

    ReplyDelete
  62. Last: 0.0289
    Change: +0.0039 (15.60%)
    Bid/Size: 0.025/49,998
    Ask/Size: 0.0289/57,966
    Volume: 341455

    ReplyDelete
  63. Last: 0.0289
    Change: +0.0039 (15.60%)
    Bid/Size: 0.02/11,900
    Ask/Size: 0.0289/10,000
    Volume: 391454

    ReplyDelete
  64. Greenshift Corp. (GERS)
    0.0289 ▲ 0.0039 (15.60%)
    Volume: 391,454

    ReplyDelete
  65. old news flash says greenshift licensed its technology to sunoco .... new one says gs cleantech extended its on-going service contract ...

    change up? meaningless?




    ReplyDelete
  66. Greenshift installs biodiesel process at ethanol plant with Jatro Diesel technology.

    ReplyDelete
  67. According to Scottrade all time low PPS tied this morning at 9:30:15.

    ReplyDelete
  68. We are very glad for you.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Last: 0.0289
    Change: 0.00 (0.00%)
    Bid/Size: 0.0197/20,000
    Ask/Size: 0.028/49,000
    Volume: 3000

    ReplyDelete
  70. Last: 0.0289
    Change: 0.00 (0.00%)
    Bid/Size: 0.0197/20,000
    Ask/Size: 0.028/49,000
    Volume: 3001

    ReplyDelete
  71. Reporting the facts is not the same as rejoicing in them; something people here have yet to learn.

    ReplyDelete
  72. on what volume ?

    ReplyDelete
  73. Last: 0.028
    Change: -0.0009 (-3.11%)
    Bid/Size: 0.0197/20,000
    Ask/Size: 0.028/48,000
    Volume: 4004

    ReplyDelete
  74. Reporting facts? As if anybody who buys a stock on the market doesn't know that?
    You once asked the poster who posted the useful information bid and ask size to stop that. Now you provide information that is plain to see for everybody, stop that.
    There's is only one that has to learn and that's you Nobody.

    ReplyDelete
  75. One, I never asked any body to do anything. Two, reaching the threshold event of an all-time low is noteworthy and not monotonous recording of the BID/ASK.

    ReplyDelete
  76. early morning $10 trades are meaningless

    ReplyDelete
  77. Incorrect. Tomorrow, the 52 week low will show that trade.

    ReplyDelete
  78. +100% up 52 week low

    ReplyDelete
  79. First you did not ask indeed, you demanded. Second it's absolutely un-noteworthy for anyone interested in GERS as watchers on message boards are, because the monotonous repetition of an all time low is clear to see.
    This is unlike the news even though sometimes rehearsed, that Slashnuts and Skunk bring that you discredit at will.
    Spending 10 years on message boards proves you are mentally unhealthy. You do realize there is professional help for you?

    ReplyDelete

  80. 52Wk Low
    May 27, 2014
    Price: 0.01

    I rest my case.

    ReplyDelete

  81. % off 52wk Low
    120.00%

    ReplyDelete
  82. Your attempts to put lipstick on a pig fail miserably. This stock has gone no where but down over the last eight plus years and euphoric attempts to disguise that reality does not hide the implications for for the future. It is simply infantile, petulant, and naive.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Hear hear, from the master of the infantile.

    ReplyDelete
  84. lol n0b0dy crying all day on boards, get job bad tradre learn to rade then amke monies

    ReplyDelete
  85. you got me all wrong would never put lipstick on your wife

    ReplyDelete