Friday, April 18, 2014

Defendants Say . . .

Defendants say '037 is obvious and obviously invalid.  See Here

Defendants request an Oral Argument [to set straight the USPTO, GreenShift and the MDL Court.]  See Here

SkunK

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

Gives new meaning to "Baffled by BS"!! MOO DHOLE

Anonymous said...

Basically, they are saying that the USTPO has been wrong on every account.

Next step please! They can argue this at trial, LOL...

Then again, I would have expected this argument.

nobody123789 said...

Anything to delay the inevitable and bleed us dry to the point that dilution and R/S will drive away any new money and drive GERS into default or BK. And everyone thinks that they are losing -- take a close look. This is classic Goliath versus David strategy that works most of the time.

Anonymous said...

If somebody was really worried about driving away new money they wouldn't constantly go on and on about how scared they are about every imagined monster hiding outside the tent. This isn't a 7th grade camp out in the back yard.

But what do I know? Maybe in your case it is.

Big Easy

Anonymous said...

Infringers now claiming that the patent(s) were obvious and should not have been awarded.

Little late don't you think! So the reasoning is, let's all infringe the patents that were issued by the USPTO and then infringe so if we get caught, we will say that they should not have been awarded anyway. Great strategy!

But this is even better... ICM said that they will also indemnify every customer that they sold a system to and now it appears that they are reneging on this promise.

And this my friends is why we are also going after DVG personally, LOL.

nobody123789 said...

And that is why there will be no settlement. We are going to jury trial.

Anonymous said...

There will be settlements and there will be jury trial, hows that for kicking in open doors.

Anonymous said...

n0b0dy wrong again LOLOLOL 95% wrong and bad trader hahaha learn to trade idiot

Slashnuts said...

(4-18-2014) Defendant ICM Gets Final Rejection Notice...

Patents claims are obvious and un-patentable over GreenShift's (Winsness') 7,608,729 patent.

04-18-2014 Final Rejection
Failed application #13/531,036

http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair

A non-final rejection notice was handed down to ICM On November 14, 2013. The USPTO rejected ICM's application as obvious and un-patentable over GreenShift's 729 patent, which issued 10-27-2009.

ICM asked the patent office to reconsider, claiming their application was not obvious and un-patentable over GreenShift's patent.

The USPTO reconsidered ICM's claims and on April 18, 2014, determined a final rejection was in order. ICM's arguments have been "fully considered but are not persuasive."

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Anonymous said...

Now what DVG? Did you really truly indemnify all your customer's? Really? Were you that sure that ICM would prevail, which assumed that the patent office has no idea what they are talking about?

This is what happens when you let personalities run a business, not business acumen!

Anonymous said...

will YAGI be able to dump shares below .01, in the ... caveat empter tier? not much interest now; much less then.

would YAGI ever prefer to hold 4.99% rather than dump, like maybe when SJ is entered and royalties start pouring in? i would.

am i being more optimistic than some or less jaded ?


Anonymous said...

What are the next key dates in the legal proceding's?

Are we waiting for the judge to rule as to summary judgment of infringement?

YAGI would be smart too hold their shares to and profit on the upside as opposed to dumping for fraction of a penny prices. They must really be hurting to sell at the prices that they sell at. Either that or they are strategically planning a coup!

nobody123789 said...

All YAGI wants is ransom NOW! If you accept this premise, then every behavior and action of theirs makes sense.

Anonymous said...

lol n0b0dy wrong again so funy. cant make trade to positive kry here all day. tool

Slashnuts said...

Defendant ICM Speaks from Both Sides of the Mouth

04-23-2014 Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)

In ICM's final rejection, which was mailed out today, the claims attempted to patent what GERS already owns the patent on.

Namely to send the "de-oiled concentrated stillage back to the evaporator". (Claim 7 of ICM's rejected application.)


So why is ICM telling the Court that GERS issued patent, which sends the concentrated stillage back to the evaporator, is "obviously invalid" when they tried and failed to patent the same thing?



ICM "obviously" wanted the patent, but isn't this speaking from both sides of the mouth? Telling the USPTO one thing and the Court another?



(4-18-2014) Defendant ICM Gets Final Rejection Notice...

Patents claims are obvious and un-patentable over GreenShift's (Winsness') 7,608,729 patent.

04-18-2014 Final Rejection
Failed application #13/531,036

http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair

A non-final rejection notice was handed down to ICM On November 14, 2013. The USPTO rejected ICM's application as obvious and un-patentable over GreenShift's 729 patent, which issued 10-27-2009.

ICM asked the patent office to reconsider, claiming their application was not obvious and un-patentable over GreenShift's patent.

The USPTO reconsidered ICM's claims and on April 18, 2014, determined a final rejection was in order. ICM's arguments have been "fully considered but are not persuasive."

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$







Anonymous said...

Sure sounds like it to me! ICM and DVG, LOL...

Anonymous said...

"NOW" is not 'now' nor tomorrow; otherwise it would be spelled tomornow.

Anonymous said...

What are the next key dates?

Are we still waiting for the judge to rule on a summary judgment of infringement?

If so, is there a date set for this ruling?

Anonymous said...

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said 0.0001 Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said...

GreenShift's Installation and License Agreement...

Featured in Hydrocarbon Engineering, April 2014 Edition

http://www.energyglobal.com/publications/preview/HydrocarbonEngineering/HydrocarbonEngineering-April-2014-Preview.pdf

(Top of page 6)

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Anonymous said...

haha n0b0dy will cry again over wekeend. lose money like girl

Slashnuts said...

GreenShift's #1 Largest Licensee to Report This Tuesday...

A sneak preview into GERS' Q114 earnings is just 2 market days away!

GERS will likely report the 1st or 2nd week of May.

GERS' largest customer will report another record breaking, profitable quarter, after the market closes on Tuesday, April 29.

Tuning in to the GPRE CC on Wednesday is a must for all GERS shareholders.

GreenShift is on the verge of turning profitable themselves and might just pull it off this time.

April 23, 2014

http://investor.gpreinc.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=841939

Green Plains to Discuss First Quarter 2014 Financial Results


OMAHA, Neb., April 23, 2014 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. (Nasdaq:GPRE) will hold a conference call to discuss its first quarter 2014 financial results on Wednesday, April 30, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. ET. Green Plains' participants will include Todd Becker, President and Chief Executive Officer, Jerry Peters, Chief Financial Officer, and Jeff Briggs, Chief Operating Officer. Following their presentation, participants will be available for a brief question and answer session.

Green Plains First Quarter 2014 Financial Results Conference Call
Wednesday, April 30, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. ET / 10:00 a.m. CT
Call in # (Domestic) 888-455-2296
Call in # (International) 719-325-2315

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said...

GERS #1 Largest Licensee Updates Corn Oil Estimates

Annual yield estimates now expected to exceed 275 million pounds, Up from 250 million pounds.

"we expect to produce over 275 million pounds of corn oil across our platform annually."


"We are operating corn oil extraction systems at 12 of our plants. The corn oil systems we installed are designed to extract non-edible corn oil from the thin stillage evaporation process immediately prior to production of distillers grains. The corn oil product is primarily marketed as a feedstock for biodiesel as well as a supplement to livestock feed.

Other industrial uses for corn oil include feedstock for rubber substitutes, rust preventatives, inks, textiles, soaps and insecticides. Our corn oil is primarily sold to biodiesel manufactures and, to a lesser extent, feed lot and poultry markets. We generally transport our corn oil by truck to locations in close proximity to our ethanol plants, primarily in the southeastern and midwestern regions of the U.S. With our continuous yield improvements we expect to produce over 275 million pounds of corn oil across our platform annually."

http://www.gpreinc.com/Corn-Oil

Green Plains has entered into a license agreement with GS CleanTech Corporation, a subsidiary of GreenShift Corporation, to utilize its patents and pending patents.

Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$

Slashnuts said...

275M pounds, a 75M increase from the 200M annual run-rate they extracted last quarter.

Slashnuts said...

An 18M pound increase, quarterly.

70M pounds per quarter, up 38% from the 50.9M in Q413.

GERS' small loss should turn into a profit, especially with 4 more plants licensed and equipment sales to MGPI/CKH.

 
Free Blog CounterTamron