In support of their invalidity challenges under § 112, Defendants rely mostly on attorney argument and ignore the undisputed facts. Defendants allege that the Patents-in-Suit are invalid because (1) the term “substantially” is indefinite; (2) the heating step is not supported by the written description; and (3) mechanically processing a stream containing at least 15% or 30% moisture is not enabled. However, the undisputed facts clearly demonstrate that the Patents-in-Suit comply with each and every requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Defendants have not raised any genuine issues of material fact and CleanTech’s motion for summary judgment under § 112 should be granted.
SkunK
lol what @ looser.....n0b0dy cant trade again LOLOLOL....stop crying in public you loook idiot
ReplyDeletenobody12378 Friday, 02/21/14 01:42:00 PM
Re: KnowBuddy post# 37201
Post # of 37207
I am doing that (not at these levels, I will wait until 0.0003 or lower, which is where I added many tens of millions of shares last time). I believe that we will not see much positive here until this round of litigation is concluded, so our revenue will increase dramatically and we rid ourselves of YAGI. I am afraid that this is more than a few months away. This is my major source of contention with those that claim "riches are right around the coroner -- just wait until the next filing". Folks have been saying that for seven years, I have not. You judge whose perspective is more reasonable.
what a flaky fake!
ReplyDeleteVery flattering how closely and diligently you follow me. Quite a compliment, thank you.
ReplyDeletenobody12378 Friday, 02/21/14 01:42:00 PM
ReplyDeleteRe: KnowBuddy post# 37201
how many server icScam got?
Greenshift Corp. (QB) (GERS)
ReplyDelete$ 0.0005 ▲0.0001 (25.00%)
Volume: 48,191,319
Greenshift Corp. (QB) (GERS)
ReplyDelete$ 0.0005 ▲0.0001 (25.00%)
Volume: 48,191,319
Greenshift Corp. (QB) (GERS)
ReplyDelete$ 0.0005 ▲0.0001 (25.00%)
Volume: 48,191,319
Greenshift Corp. (QB) (GERS)
ReplyDelete$ 0.0005 ▲0.0001 (25.00%)
Volume: 48,191,319
Nobody fears my view of the future because he knows I have the evil eye, from my Avatar Photo. I see many of the defendants accepting the terms of the settlement; with ICM and a couple more stubbornly Appealing the case. Their lawyers will eat the Companies which appeal and the others will become Customers of GERS. While we prosper, the Evil ones will Perish...One by One. I have been tending my Flock of Stocks this week and am up over $3,000.00. How YOU doing, NoBuddy??
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteahahahahahahahaha^^^rolmfao
ReplyDeleteOkay all you rocket scientists and financial gurus. Do you now have a clue why there is dilution when GreenShift is making plenty of money to pay the bills?
ReplyDeleteVery simply, GreenShift is not hanging its hat on one patented process. Money is being spent to acquire other technologies in the green industry, which costs money. As long as GERS can let YAGI dilute and maintain funds for other ventures, it will be done.
Very simple minded me
A voice from the Hallelujah Choir.
ReplyDelete2 weeks in Europe!! Yea!!
ReplyDeleteNot to worry. I will be able to hear the screeches over the great 10K that is (not!) coming in a few weeks and the near ecstasy over a 0.0001 advance in the PPS (for a day or two), like adolescent girls at their first slumber party, all the way across the pond. Hard to miss.
ReplyDeleteCertain terms in the past contracts with YAGI have required a ratio of stocks in repayment, as well as cash. GERS has boodles of Stock. Ipso Facto!
ReplyDelete(A little Latin for NoBuddy!!)
ReplyDeleteRecent CandleStick Analysis
Very Bullish
Date Candle
Feb-21-2014 Homing Pigeon
Feb-20-2014 DOJI
Feb-19-2014 Homing Pigeon
Feb-18-2014 Homing Pigeon
Feb-14-2014 Homing Pigeon
Read more at http://www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/analysis.pl?symb=GERS&cobrand=&mode=stock#l0OwPQijSsTPjmWP.99
The bars say to SELL!!!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.barchart.com/opinions/stocks/GERS
The Bulls say to STAY OUT!!!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.americanbulls.com/SignalPage.aspx?lang=en&Ticker=GERS
The doctors say NPD!!!
ReplyDeleteNarcissistic Personality Disorder
(NPD) is a pattern of self-centered or egotistical behavior that shows up in thinking and behavior in a lot of different situations and activities. People with NPD won't (or can't) change their behavior even when it causes problems at work or when other people complain about the way they act, or when their behavior causes a lot of emotional distress to others (or themselves? none of my narcissists ever admit to being distressed by their own behavior -- they always blame other people for any problems). This pattern of self-centered or egotistical behavior is not caused by current drug or alcohol use, head injury, acute psychotic episodes, or any other illness, but has been going on steadily at least since adolescence or early adulthood.
You got that right -- NPD -- my (N)ostradamus (P)redictions (D)ictate GERS' results.
ReplyDeleteMany longs have learned that Nobody is right far more often than he/she is wrong, certainly has a much better long term record than others here. You may not like his/her style but that doesn't lead to logically discounting his/her observations. Time has solidified that truism.
ReplyDeletegoing by that logic a person saying the sun will shine everyday is right far more often than he/she is wrong certainly has a much better long term record than others...except a few people know more such as when there will be an eclipse of the sun. Primitive investors get scared easily when the sun does not shine, savvy investors clean up knowing the science of investing. GERS is going to have an eclipse nobody saw coming, but I did.
ReplyDeleteThen why are you not buying shares at these puny low levels. It would take only a few thousand dollars to but enough shares to require filing an 8-K; only one has done that so far. Why not you O' Great Fearless Investor?
ReplyDeleteOh, I already have...the eclipse is coming, you know, the one where the moon of justice devours the power of the infringing sun? All around the timid crowds are wondering, "What happened to the Sun?"
ReplyDeletewere did you get that crazy notion that " it would take only a few thousand dollars to but ? enough shares to require filing an 8-k" ?
ReplyDeleteHas your friend the accountant filled you in?
Anyway you are as usual way off....
Nobody has been more wrong then Nobody, most wise people shut up when fools speak.
.05 x 750,000,000 x 0.0002 = $7500. In my neighborhood, that is a few thousand dollars. In fact if you think that is a significant sum, there is no way that you are going to be able ride this train to the land of riches; you will not be able average down effectively to capitalize.
ReplyDeleteDing, ding -- dumping continues.
ReplyDeleteSacre Bleu (practicing my French, onl the French do not use this phrase): ASK to BID is 5.7 to 1, even at this low level. Will it never end?
ReplyDeleteThis person on Yahoo keeps saying GERS filled for bankruptcy? Is that true? If not, how can someone get away with that? It is more than someone's expression of freedom of speech, it is fraud and slanderous.
ReplyDeleteNot true, you would see an 8-K SEC filing. Frankly, these statements are not why the PPS is not, and never has moved north. Save your ire for where it is needed. Anyone making investment decisions based on what is written in these "blogs", should lose all their money. Is the real problem that these statements cause you some anguish?
ReplyDeleteimpossible for you to give an answer huh? Instead of that you give us some of your Neanderthaler impressions
ReplyDelete"were did you get that crazy notion that " it would take only a few thousand dollars to but ? enough shares to require filing an 8-k" ?"
No need to give another example of the math in your neighborhood, just give an answer moron.
The jerk screaming "bankruptcy" on Yahoo is a PEIX customer who is angry at Slash for claiming PEIX is infringing (which they are). Thanks to Slash, we now have another PEIX enthusiast as one of our moderators on Ihub as well.
ReplyDeleteThought we were going to get a break from Nobody for at least a couple of weeks. Did Europe refuse him entrance onto the continent? Guess they already filled their NPD quota.
Just imagine, nobody is investing in gers for the past few years, ever since the lawsuits started.
ReplyDeleteJust imagine a lawyer for the company standing in front of a jury, "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, as you can see by the vast amount of evidence, the infringing companies caused great pain financially to Greenshift corp causing near bankruptcy and great loss to shareholders. We ask for justice in determination of damages."
Next week, you will have a reprieve from "truth, justice and the American way", for two weeks. Bet you the PPS will not advance during that time.
ReplyDeleteI'm looking forward to be able to "leap tall buildings in a single bound".
ReplyDeleteRelatively large SELLS and small BUYS, I suspect that some are placing these $100 orders just to keep their spirits high.
ReplyDeleteLast: 0.0005
ReplyDeleteChange: 0.00 (0.00%)
Bid/Size: 0.0004/27,701,005
Ask/Size: 0.0005/16,397,102
Volume: 19840615
Last: 0.0005
ReplyDeleteChange: 0.00 (0.00%)
Bid/Size: 0.0004/27,701,004
Ask/Size: 0.0005/16,513,768
Volume: 19890616
52 week high: 0.0139
52 week low: 0.0001
Last: 0.0005
ReplyDeleteChange: 0.00 (0.00%)
Bid/Size: 0.0004/28,487,104
Ask/Size: 0.0005/16,084,130
Volume: 19891616
Recent CandleStick Analysis
ReplyDeleteVery Bullish
Date Candle
Feb-24-2014 Homing Pigeon
Chart Indicators
Ind. short Inter Long
EMA VBu VBu VBu
MACD VBu VBu VBu
Read more at http://www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/analysis.pl?symb=GERS&cobrand=&mode=stock#iqC1w1o0DPGVlXKG.99
Stay out of GERS!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.americanbulls.com/SignalPage.aspx?lang=en&Ticker=GERS
Sell!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.barchart.com/opinions/stocks/GERS
49% of recent volume due to NITE, the major functionary of dilution selling:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.otcbb.com/asp/tradeact_mv.asp?SearchBy=issue&SortBy=volume&Issue=GErs&Month=1-1-2014
Greenshift Corp. (QB (GERS)
ReplyDelete0.0005 ▲ 0.0001 (25.00%)
Volume: 19890616
Bid/Size: 0.0004/29,834,500
ReplyDeleteAsk/Size: 0.0005/9,997,164
.0006
ReplyDeleteA little calculation:
ReplyDeleteWe have had 67 trading days since we learned that the OS share count was 760,000,000. During those days we have averaged more than 15,000,000 shares traded per day. We have learned that NITE (the major, but not the only purveyor of dilution trades) accounted for an average 0f 49% of those trades. Assume, very conservatively that 30% of all trades were dilution based. Then 760,000,000 + 0.3 x 67 x 15,000,000 = 1,061,500,000 is an average, lower estimate of our OS count, basic as of today.
So what? Good for our company that they raise cash!
ReplyDeleteYou wanna whine? Please be our guest, cry baby.
did you invest 8 years to early for your liking, tante pis pour toi, crapule qui inflingment cette souffrance a l'humanite.
Increasing the share count by 300,000,000 shares is only $150,000.00.
ReplyDeleteLet's smooth this out in the next few weeks/months when the revenue picture is clear and the growth is detailed. This will be one great story line!
ReplyDeleteBid/Size: 0.0004/34,724,500
Ask/Size: 0.0005/8,667,165
Volume: 9401339
52 week high: 0.0139
52 week low: 0.0001
Why do you think the revenue picture will be clear? It has not been for the past several years and there is a fundamental reason why it cannot be until the court-award damages are in our treasury and that will be many months, probably several years from now.
ReplyDeleteLast: 0.0005
ReplyDeleteChange: 0.00 (0.00%)
Bid/Size: 0.0004/34,724,400
Ask/Size: 0.0005/8,594,165
Volume: 9791345
.0006
ReplyDeleteLast: 0.0005
ReplyDeleteChange: 0.00 (0.00%)
Bid/Size: 0.0004/36,824,400
Ask/Size: 0.0005/8,672,803
Volume: 13791345
.0006
ReplyDeleteBid/Size: 0.0004/31,517,400
ReplyDeleteAsk/Size: 0.0005/8,370,803
Volume: 15753345
Why would you question the revenue increase when their existing and new customers are at record production levels. We get a piece of all that revenue. If one or more ethanol; producers settle, this moves rapidly higher. I think that there is a very good likely hood that that will happen. Big question is, will ICM indemnify all their clients who are infringing by association??? Ouch!
ReplyDeleteYou haven't been paying attention or you have not done your homework. Our client's revenues only marginally impact our reported revenue. It has been this way for several years. There is a good reason for this, one that will NOT be rectified until the current round of litigation is adjudicated. This is also why, in the face of client's record revenues, we must continue to dilute to pay our bills. PERIOD!!!
ReplyDeleteEncore plus de imbécilement, tu pue le mettre le PERIOD en place dans le vôtre cul.
ReplyDeleteMémé quand il y a pas de vingt pour cent, ce que qui reste profite de haussier.
On diluer pas seulement pour notre "bills". Essayer pensé avant écrire, PERIOD
LMFAO^^^
ReplyDeleteVery intelligent:
ReplyDeleteEven more stupidly, you stink put in place in the PERIOD yours ass.
Even when there is no twenty percent, which remains bullish advantage.
We concentrate not only for our "bills." Try thinking before writing, PERIOD.
Inverted Hammer Today/Breakout Tomorrow
ReplyDeleteRecent CandleStick Analysis
Very Bullish
Date Candle
Feb-25-2014 Inverted Hammer
Feb-24-2014 Homing Pigeon
Feb-21-2014 Homing Pigeon
Feb-20-2014 DOJI
Feb-19-2014 Homing Pigeon
Read more at www.stockta.com/cgi-bin/analysis.pl?symb=GERS&cobrand=&mode=stock#mOdtQlVqgL4l4bEI.99
Unser Arschloch braucht Google fuhr sein "Intelligenz'
ReplyDelete