GumShoe on the Case

The following consist of two (identical?) text sections.

The first section is what I was able to create with like five copy/pastes and adding a single period from THIS DOCUMENT HERE.

The second section was what I copy/pasted from the comment section of my recent blog. 

It appears I am the second person to do the same thing.  It looks like someone used the document above from an unrelated case to create the post in my comments.

PS.  I claim no supernatural powers.  Only the powers of GOGGLE.   If you goggle a major portion of the text below it will lead you to both the document and the comment section of my blog. Given all the printed material in the scope of human history -  the unrelated doc and the comment in my blog come up as one and two.   Coincidence?

Click For EXAMPLE

PSS  Did I solve the mystery?  Maybe.  If one could link a lawyer to both cases, then one could then say that they merely wrote both from a generic "settlement file".  That could explain the "sameness" although it would not explain its apparent absence in Pacer.  Copy/pastes are used as shortcuts by both lawyers AND pranksters.  Although at this point I lean heavily toward the latter.  I would, however love to be wrong.

*************************************
Text Section One
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE

("Plaintiff") (together with Defendants, the "Parties"), by counsel, hereby inform the Court that they have reached a settlement in the above-captioned case. The Parties are working on finalizing the settlement documents and anticipate filing a dismissal within thirty days. Accordingly, the Parties have mutually agreed to extend Defendants'  deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint an additional thirty days, pending the finalization of their settlement papers and filing of the dismissal. The Parties also request that the Court vacate the status conference.
WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that in light of the Parties' settlement that the court extend Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint an additional thirty days.

 

***********************

Text Section Two

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND JOINT MOTION
TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE
("Plaintiff") (together with Defendants, the "Parties"), by counsel, hereby inform the Court that they have reached a settlement in the above-captioned case. The Parties are working on finalizing the settlement documents and anticipate filing a dismissal within thirty days. Accordingly, the Parties have mutually agreed to extend Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint an additional thirty days, pending the finalization of their settlement papers and filing of the dismissal. The Parties also request that the Court vacate the status conference.
WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that in light of the Parties' settlement that the court extend Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint an additional thirty days.

*************************

SkunK