I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
Ever hear the phrase for "the lack of a nail the kingdom was lost"? Looks like for the lack of a few bucks in taxes the entity bringing the legal action against the plaintiffs ceased to exist -- that they went under as envisioned by the defendants' legal strategy; and we did not even know it? Anyone see an 8-K filing announcing its loss of corporate status? Maybe now we know the reason GERS has been trading as if it was BK, as if it was no longer a corporate entity.
"And I do hereby further certify that the aforesaid corporation was so proclaimed in accordance with the provisions of general corporation law of the state of Delaware on the sixteenth day of May, 2013,"
All this talk about SJ and early closure led to the stock PPS plunging 33.33%. Perhaps related to the lack of disclosure to SEC and investors of tax delinquency?
It is clear to me that there is one and only reason why this stock is so depressed. Nobody123789 has single-highhandedly accomplished this on behalf of the infringers. A man has to do what he has to do to protect what is rightfully his and his family's. My future is directly linked to the performance of this stock and Nobody123789's voice somehow needs to be neutralized to eliminate the source of this threat to my family. Skunk any help here?
The defendants have slithered their way to a new level of desperation. This excuse for infringing is far from solid, pun intended. It sounds like it's going down the same old path as their other debunked excuses.
The patents are completely devoid of any requirement to strain or not to strain solids from the process. Rosten's idea was to remove solids and then centrifuge oil before evaporation, much like Barlage suggested during the testing phase.
The fantasyland excuse the defendants are dreaming up asks the court, yet again, to import limitations into the patents claims. Claims and restrictions that simply don't exist anywhere whatsoever in the patents. The court will not grant this wish as has been demonstrated before with the "95%" defense.
"With respect to the absolute percentages advocated by the Defendants’, the Court concludes that the argument improperly seeks to import limitations from the specification into the claims. First, the Defendants cannot point to any language in the claims, the specification or the prosecution history that limit the substantially oil free limitation to the quantities listed in Figure 2 of the ‘858 patent family. There simply is none. The claims, as recited above, are completely devoid of any reference to numerical quantities."
"The Defendants contend that the statement “as claimed” in the underlined portion of the second explanation is a clear disavowal of claim scope as to all claims of the ‘858 patent and requires the concentrate or syrup after the oil recovery step to be substantially free of oil. The Court disagrees."
"However nothing in the context of the prosecution history indicates that Defendants’ presumption is correct. Defendants’ assumptions regarding the grounds on which Applicants distinguished from Prevost are completely without support in the record of the prosecution history."
When all the defendants run out of excuses and have no defense left, it would seem to me that their attorney's would ahve an obligation to suggest and strongly force the issue of settlement. As of now, they ahve not made any progress and the treble damamges continue to pile up. Of the remaining theives, who will be the first to settle? My guess is that it won't be ICM and their egomaniac leader...
A lot of wishful thinking. Treble damages? A fantasy! We will be lucky to get our attorney's fees and a few million dollars after all appeals have been completed in several years. That will go to C&C and YAGI. Common shareholders that expect anything out of this have not followed the bouncing ball of contingency and indebtedness.
Yes, there are folks bidding for 58 million shares @ 0.0002 who will not even pay another 0.0001 for those shares with 5.8 million sitting there for the asking at that price. This tells you absolutely everything you need to know about the desirability of this equity beyond the decimal-penny flippers who want to make a few grand.
You will see it in the April 10K filing. If you think that it has to go through the normal market channels history has shown that to be incorrect. The growth of the OS count basic has exceeded all sales for a given quarter; last quarter (Q3) was an example. Over the years several newbies have staked their reputations on minimal or no dilution for a given quarter based on reported market activity only to be chased into the woods with their tails between their legs as the share count continued to climb way beyond their expectations. Be warned!
Screaming doesn't change the facts that have been documented here and elsewhere over the years. Petulance is not a substitute for objectivity. Sorry to cloud your vision. If you are unable or unwilling to go back into the records to develop your own factual basis and are the passive person you appear to be; just wait until the 10K is out, it will tell everything you need to know about dilution since last November.
One time, just one time I will do your work for you; I refrain from associating with foul-mouthed Neanderthals -- so unsavory.
Nov 12, 2013 760,391,887 shares Aug 14, 2013 293,953,846 shares Difference 466,438,041 in 61 trading days
Total shares traded in those 61 days 352,879,621
More than 110,000,000 (lower bound) in new share count that could not have moved through "normal" trading and that number assumes that ALL reported trades were dilution trades.
Q.E.D. (quod erat demonstrandum,for the uneducated).
Now you can get back to your fantasies.
Don't believe these data? Then as I stated previously you will have a rude awakening in April.
See Here
Last: 0.0003
ReplyDeleteChange: 0.00 (0.00%)
Bid/Size: 0.0002/50,467,798
Ask/Size: 0.0003/18,245,794
Volume: 1010201
ReplyDeleteLast: 0.0003
Change: 0.00 (0.00%)
Bid/Size: 0.0002/56,467,798
Ask/Size: 0.0003/14,745,794
Volume: 4510201
Last: 0.0003
ReplyDeleteChange: 0.00 (0.00%)
Bid/Size: 0.0002/53,467,798
Ask/Size: 0.0003/6,745,700
Volume: 12510201
$11,000 Bid $2,400 Ask
ReplyDeleteEver hear the phrase for "the lack of a nail the kingdom was lost"? Looks like for the lack of a few bucks in taxes the entity bringing the legal action against the plaintiffs ceased to exist -- that they went under as envisioned by the defendants' legal strategy; and we did not even know it? Anyone see an 8-K filing announcing its loss of corporate status? Maybe now we know the reason GERS has been trading as if it was BK, as if it was no longer a corporate entity.
ReplyDeletewhat about the name chnage to greenshift on feb 11
ReplyDelete"shifty" of them don't you think?
ReplyDeleteold news got any new news?
ReplyDeletea serious request for help, support, mercy etc. : an attempt to make someone do or accept something as ...
ReplyDeleteappeal - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com
Definition of appeal : Appeal means to ask, or address. If you appeal to someone's better nature, you're asking them for mercy.
So nobody when's dave gonna beg for mercy, again?
Do you suffer from selective reading?
ReplyDelete"And I do hereby further certify that the aforesaid corporation was so proclaimed in accordance with the provisions of general corporation law of the state of Delaware on the sixteenth day of May, 2013,"
Bid/Size: 0.0002/55,967,779
ReplyDeleteAsk/Size: 0.0003/8,360,700
Bid/Size: 0.0002/54,521,979
ReplyDeleteAsk/Size: 0.0003/6,915,000
Volume: 16956015
Read further about reporting to the Governor that same company for failing to pay their annual taxes.
ReplyDeleteBid/Size: 0.0002/56,519,479
ReplyDeleteAsk/Size: 0.0003/6,915,000
Volume: 17458515
Nobody, it's cleared up, delinquent for a month LAST year! old news! get it together man!
ReplyDeleteYou lost the bet chicken dick. HA!no ask @2. double or nothin tomorrow?
ReplyDeleteAll this talk about SJ and early closure led to the stock PPS plunging 33.33%. Perhaps related to the lack of disclosure to SEC and investors of tax delinquency?
ReplyDelete"Nothin" is about all it is worth, trading as BK equity; you cannot disguise, excuse, or explain away that fact.
ReplyDeleteIt is clear to me that there is one and only reason why this stock is so depressed. Nobody123789 has single-highhandedly accomplished this on behalf of the infringers. A man has to do what he has to do to protect what is rightfully his and his family's. My future is directly linked to the performance of this stock and Nobody123789's voice somehow needs to be neutralized to eliminate the source of this threat to my family.
ReplyDeleteSkunk any help here?
12500000 buys <5000000 sells
ReplyDeletebid built up to 56000000 ask looks weak @ 6900000
double or nothin it is chicken dick.HA! see ya tomorrow!
ReplyDelete$11,200 Bid Ask $2000
ReplyDeleteAgreed. The ask looked anemic all day & towards close. This security has a different feel lately.
ReplyDeleteskunk a little help here. can we use your strainer to filter out bozo's BS?
ReplyDeletevelmi velké množství peněz, bude udělena k této společnosti v letošním roce
ReplyDeleteThe defendants have slithered their way to a new level of desperation. This excuse for infringing is far from solid, pun intended. It sounds like it's going down the same old path as their other debunked excuses.
ReplyDeleteThe patents are completely devoid of any requirement to strain or not to strain solids from the process. Rosten's idea was to remove solids and then centrifuge oil before evaporation, much like Barlage suggested during the testing phase.
The fantasyland excuse the defendants are dreaming up asks the court, yet again, to import limitations into the patents claims. Claims and restrictions that simply don't exist anywhere whatsoever in the patents. The court will not grant this wish as has been demonstrated before with the "95%" defense.
"With respect to the absolute percentages advocated by the Defendants’, the Court concludes that the argument improperly seeks to import limitations from the specification into the claims. First, the Defendants cannot point to any language in the claims, the specification or the prosecution history that limit the substantially oil free limitation to the quantities listed in Figure 2 of the ‘858 patent family. There simply is none. The claims, as recited above, are completely devoid of any reference to numerical quantities."
"The Defendants contend that the statement “as claimed” in the underlined portion of the second explanation is a clear disavowal of claim scope as to all claims of the ‘858 patent and requires the concentrate or syrup after the oil recovery step to be substantially free of oil. The Court disagrees."
"However nothing in the context of the prosecution history indicates that Defendants’ presumption is correct. Defendants’ assumptions regarding the grounds on which Applicants distinguished from Prevost are completely without support in the record of the prosecution history."
Time to move this along! We need to send the courts another injunction demand.
ReplyDeleteWhen all the defendants run out of excuses and have no defense left, it would seem to me that their attorney's would ahve an obligation to suggest and strongly force the issue of settlement. As of now, they ahve not made any progress and the treble damamges continue to pile up. Of the remaining theives, who will be the first to settle? My guess is that it won't be ICM and their egomaniac leader...
ReplyDeleteA lot of wishful thinking. Treble damages? A fantasy! We will be lucky to get our attorney's fees and a few million dollars after all appeals have been completed in several years. That will go to C&C and YAGI. Common shareholders that expect anything out of this have not followed the bouncing ball of contingency and indebtedness.
ReplyDeleteBid is 10Xs ask !
ReplyDeletetoday is double or nothin chicken dick. you ready to do some kissin?
ReplyDeleteBid/Size: 0.0002/61,808,898
ReplyDeleteAsk/Size: 0.0003/5,885,000
Volume: 581
Yes, there are folks bidding for 58 million shares @ 0.0002 who will not even pay another 0.0001 for those shares with 5.8 million sitting there for the asking at that price. This tells you absolutely everything you need to know about the desirability of this equity beyond the decimal-penny flippers who want to make a few grand.
ReplyDeleteBid $12,400 Ask $1700
ReplyDeletewhere is the dilution?
ReplyDelete.0004
ReplyDeleteYou will see it in the April 10K filing. If you think that it has to go through the normal market channels history has shown that to be incorrect. The growth of the OS count basic has exceeded all sales for a given quarter; last quarter (Q3) was an example. Over the years several newbies have staked their reputations on minimal or no dilution for a given quarter based on reported market activity only to be chased into the woods with their tails between their legs as the share count continued to climb way beyond their expectations. Be warned!
ReplyDeleteProve it or shut up! nothing but noise! is the ask@ 2 yet?
ReplyDeleteScreaming doesn't change the facts that have been documented here and elsewhere over the years. Petulance is not a substitute for objectivity. Sorry to cloud your vision. If you are unable or unwilling to go back into the records to develop your own factual basis and are the passive person you appear to be; just wait until the 10K is out, it will tell everything you need to know about dilution since last November.
ReplyDeleteget ready to do some kissin ask not @2 you lost AGAIN!
ReplyDeletecan't prove so say you go find it?
ReplyDeleteits YOUR claim prove it or shut it
One time, just one time I will do your work for you; I refrain from associating with foul-mouthed Neanderthals -- so unsavory.
ReplyDeleteNov 12, 2013 760,391,887 shares
Aug 14, 2013 293,953,846 shares
Difference 466,438,041 in 61 trading days
Total shares traded in those 61 days 352,879,621
More than 110,000,000 (lower bound) in new share count that could not have moved through "normal" trading and that number assumes that ALL reported trades were dilution trades.
Q.E.D. (quod erat demonstrandum,for the uneducated).
Now you can get back to your fantasies.
Don't believe these data? Then as I stated previously you will have a rude awakening in April.
aug 19 to nov 11 675,000,000 traded
ReplyDeleteyou need check your math