I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
"The court understands the potential that timing of the later events-summary judgment briefing- may be affected by progress in the non-2013 cases and that the parties and court may need to revisit deadlines."
The timeline is for the 2013 "tag-along" cases. Learn to read nobody123789. It doesn't even mean that they will get that far. If GERS gets the summary of judgement the tag-alongs will have to settle
How many times and for how long have we heard that the current batch of defendants would have "no choice but to settle"? Do you not learn from history?
Man, oh man, look at all the buying interest in GERS based on your assumption of what the judge should have said, what the judge means, what the defendants are going to do that they haven't done in four years? With interest like this we will be seeing 0.0002 ASK before the day is over.
"If" a SJ (partial or full) is ordered it will be immediately appealed. In any event why will the tag-alongs have to settle? There is no gun to their head only the likelihood of extending the proceedings until GERS goes under. Which has been the strategy from day one, and one that is very successful in "David vs. Goliath" IP litigation. You may not like this, you may think it stinks, you may yell about injustice; but face the reality that a long road is still ahead.
It doesn't occur every moment of every day, and much of it never enters the market as you can see it. It just shows up in the rapidly escalating OS count, basic and diluted in the filings.
I like the sound of progress!
ReplyDelete"The court understands the potential that timing of the later events-summary judgment briefing- may be affected by progress in the non-2013 cases and that the parties and court may need to revisit deadlines."
Your excited about the legal wrangling not even starting to be completed on February 3, 2015?? That is 2015!!! You are a very patient person.
ReplyDeleteTiming of later events-summary judgement briefing tells me that someone has settled. Read between the courts lines.
ReplyDeleteThe timeline is for the 2013 "tag-along" cases. Learn to read nobody123789. It doesn't even mean that they will get that far. If GERS gets the summary of judgement the tag-alongs will have to settle
ReplyDeleteExactly
ReplyDeleteHow many times and for how long have we heard that the current batch of defendants would have "no choice but to settle"? Do you not learn from history?
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like the judge expects A settlement. Is it to late to buy?
ReplyDeleteThat's what I thought too. Progress in the old cases will shorten the deadline for the new cases.
ReplyDeleteShe shoulda said "the court understands settlements willchange the deadline"
ReplyDeletebasically that's what he said or hinted in encryption i agree
ReplyDeleteMan, oh man, look at all the buying interest in GERS based on your assumption of what the judge should have said, what the judge means, what the defendants are going to do that they haven't done in four years? With interest like this we will be seeing 0.0002 ASK before the day is over.
ReplyDeleteI'll take that bet. ask will not be @ 2. The low volume is low dilution. or no dilution. only accumulation.
ReplyDelete""If"" GERS gets the summary of judgement the tag-alongs will have to settle. Like I said before nobody123789 learn how to read.
ReplyDelete"If" a SJ (partial or full) is ordered it will be immediately appealed. In any event why will the tag-alongs have to settle? There is no gun to their head only the likelihood of extending the proceedings until GERS goes under. Which has been the strategy from day one, and one that is very successful in "David vs. Goliath" IP litigation. You may not like this, you may think it stinks, you may yell about injustice; but face the reality that a long road is still ahead.
ReplyDeleteAccumulation? You can buy 18,000,000 shares at 0.0003 and not budge the ASK or BID.
ReplyDeletePretty clear that non of the orators here have jumped in, put their money where their mouths are.
ReplyDelete"If" a SJ (partial or full) is ordered it will be immediately appealed.
ReplyDeletemeanwhile cash grows sales grow dilution slows and more licensed. What fence sitters would infringe in the face of a court order?
bid growing 42,000,000
ReplyDeleteNonsense if 18000000 were bought @ 3 the ask would be 4
ReplyDeleteYou just do not get it -- there will be an inexhaustible supply until the dilution is ended.
ReplyDeleteand where is the dilution?
ReplyDeletevolume 1.0M
ReplyDeletebid 43.4 ask 18
ReplyDeleteOOHHHHHMMMMYYYYYYGGGGOOOOOODDDDD LOOK AT ALL THE DILUTION!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeletevolume 1.0m
Hey nobody123789 how much does ICM pay you bash? Can guys hire me too?
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't occur every moment of every day, and much of it never enters the market as you can see it. It just shows up in the rapidly escalating OS count, basic and diluted in the filings.
ReplyDeletein other words there it stopped^^^
ReplyDeleteDoesn't appeal mean they don't like the decision ie they lost?
ReplyDeleteIn your fantasies only.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeletea serious request for help, support, mercy etc. : an attempt to make someone do or accept something as ...
appeal - Dictionary Definition : Vocabulary.com
Definition of appeal : Appeal means to ask, or address. If you appeal to someone's better nature, you're asking them for mercy.
So nobody when's dave gonna start begging for mercy?
They already tried with the writ of mandus
ReplyDeleteJá jsem z toho volaaký zmatený.
ReplyDeleteCo teda vlastně nás čeká tento rok, prosím?
velmi velké množství peněz, bude udělena k této společnosti v letošním roce
ReplyDelete