I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
All ICM electronic data shall be treated by Transperfect as “Highly Confidential – For ICM’s Eyes Only, pending ICM’s review. . . 
Posts
25 comments:
Imagine the skeletons in the ICM closet!
Operating revenues will bb increasing nicely! Who will be the first infringer to settle?
None! They are all indemnified by ICM. If anyone "settles' that agreement is void for them, they would be directly "on the hook" and on their own. Please do some reading before voicing your vacuous opinions. Or perhaps, you have "invested" too deeply and are trying to pump your way out by co-opting others into rescuing your dead money.
I love when someone swallows the bait. Thank you for making my point know-it-all...
That is the OOPS, I got caught with my foot-in-the-mouth no so creative response.
Be advised nobody123789 is a paid basher. But this one is too funny. "They are all indemnified by ICM." You can't be serious - ICM is barely alive themselves, they have no funds to cover any of the costs that the infringers will incur. It is a VERY hollow promise. Kinda like - "If you like your doctor you can keep him." Both impossible statements and both knowingly untrue.
Abe L.
We are from the government - and we are here to help!
The check is in the mail!
indemnified by ICM!
not in your mouth!
Let's pimp the cadets!
Now that is nobody you can believe in!
Someone is going to come in an scoop GERS up. Ultra low market cap on increasing revenues. If ICM can't indemnify the infringers, GERS can go after them directly. Infringing is infringing is infringing. Patents continue to be verifies, new patents have been issued, current patents have been strengthened, and every court decision has gone in favor of GERS. The dated letter/offer for sale issue is not an issue. What it does represent is the last skinny thread that have to hand by.
" ... scoop GERS up"? You are kidding, right? Do you have any idea what the share structure is?
The share structure isn't as bad as ecos
Ecos - 10 billion - trades at .0003
Gers customer Gpre make sp 600 listing
http://www.gpreinc.com/News/145
"None! They are all indemnified by ICM. If anyone "settles' that agreement is void for them, they would be directly "on the hook" and on their own."
That is patently false. Quit spreading ill-informed misinformation. Lies.
Since you are clearly ignorant of basic facts here I will give you some homework; the outcome of which will enlighten you. Fill in the blanks:" www.abengoa.com; ICM, Dave Vander Griend, CEO, (316) .... The company also offers full indemnification from patent infringement as part ...".
When you complete your assignment you will realize that ignorance is not bliss.
If I gave you a lie detector test, the machine would implode from the pressure of your elongated nose.
My point is clear. You can validate my statement with publicly available information. Sorry, to wreck your pumping parade of nonsense and dribble.
You're right I meant snout.
Typical of people that cannot counter what they do not like with objective and factual arguments -- they resort to innuendo and aspersion. You have a great deal of company in your brain dead world. Your company form the large cadre of losers that feed the world's rich and intelligentsia.
Do you believe your own lies or just sticking to the script ?
update: n0b0dy still broke hahahah cant tradea nd pooor
Indeed there have been settlements. Two that we know about. The first being an ICM designed system at Center Ethanol. The second, an Edeniq system at Amaizing Energy.
Your question should read, "Who will be the third infringer(that we know about) to settle?
Furthermore, the statement, "they are all indemnified by ICM" isn't just recklessly misleading, it's flat out wrong. The poster knows better and offers nothing more than an outdated quote about a company that's not even a defendant in the litigation. Attempting to throw this blanket of coverage over current defendant's including non ICM customers is a wash.
According to SEC filings, AMTX reveals, "The process provider has no obligation to indemnify the company."
In addition, GEA has declared they will no longer sell centrifuges for the purpose of separating corn oil, unless that producer is licensed with GreenShift.
I see no indication that ICM has ageed to indemnify PEIX, Homeland Energy, Little Sioux, or any of the "new" defendants.
What we've seen since the revised Marksman ruling is ICM has clamed up. No more information about AOS customers has been made public. ICM refuses to release this list out of fear of additional lawsuit's/liability.
If anybody has any up-to-date proof ICM has agreed to indemnify all infringers, please post it here.
Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$
fyi dvg is former ceo abengoa
If anybody has any up-to-date proof ICM has agreed to indemnify all infringers, please post it here.
""""Crickets""""""
Hahahahahaaaa
Heard the ICM Christmas Party is tonight.
All the employees have to bring the boss either gold, frankincense or myrrh.
Then they get indemnified and keep their job until New Years Eve. You should see what they have to do then!
nobody dunno how to trade. wife left .spends all day bashn gers .alone Christmas. sad
Post a Comment