Thursday, December 5, 2013

Flottweg Order

See Here

SkunK

25 comments:

  1. look at all that dilution today

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am afraid that you have a a very short memory. No dilution one day does not disguise that of others. If you like to play with your emotions feeding them false signals, OK, but that is all you are doing. 1,000,000,000 and climbing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It will all be over soon ICM and the other clowns. Keep up the negative posts,

    ReplyDelete
  4. Soon? You haven't started to suffer the ravages that time will take. SOON?? You haven't a clue!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Times up ICM and clowns. Gers still here winning.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I got you mother sooner than I though.Soon????

    ReplyDelete
  7. Headlines will read, "Injunction Granted, Infringers Must Cease Using the GERS Patented Process"...

    ReplyDelete
  8. You are plain dreaming. Even if this occurs as in your fantasy the next headline will read: "Appellate Court stays injunction until pending appeal heard". Get real here, you are substituting hopes for your miniscule gamble for the facts at hand that the years have documented without qualification.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You are most likely accurate in your prediction. Has nothing to do with the headlines I am hoping for. An appeal is almost certain, you are a genius.

    ReplyDelete
  10. GERS has won almost every court proceeding to date. This string will continue and the damages are accumulating. Willful infringement will be found, treble damages. I suspect there will be some stock accumulation in the next few weeks and months by those who realize the future value. Those that post here and work for (or run) an infringing company better start looking for gainful employment elsewhere. I also heard a commercial on Sirrus radio by GPRE for ethanol, cool...

    ReplyDelete
  11. The court victories have been piling up for all to see -- you are correct. Have you asked yourself the question why no one else see riches here any time soon? Yes, no one else -- look at the PPS, it is less than if GERS had filed BK. Have you asked yourself why every one else is so stupid and you are so intelligent? The implication that the only persons willing to state the obvious work (or run) for an infringing company speaks volumes about the blinders that constrain your vision and the bias that impacts your decision making.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Why are you here if you don't own the stock? You are the real loser, a message board troll...

    My guess is that you, your job and your company feel threatened. Why are you here? Why? I own the stock and I know why I am here, but why are you here?

    ReplyDelete
  13. "I suspect there will be some stock accumulation in the next few weeks and months by those who realize the future value." Do you have any idea how often that has been stated here and on other boards over the years? Most of these pundits have been sent, tail between their legs, into the hinterland of huge losses cursing the day that they heard of Greenshift.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I can guarantee that I own far more than you. Just because I own many millions of hares does not mean that I cannot see and state the obvious. Further, I do not prostitute myself by attempting to get others to boost my share value by "convincing" them to come "join the fun" with promises of riches SOON to be had.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I have never suggested that anyone buy this stock, I am only expressing my beliefs. Time will tell...

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yea we saw what happened to the last "appeal". no grounds. btw when you need an appeal means you lost.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Do not confuse the Writ of Mandamus with the appeal of anything that comes from the district court. Either party will get a full hearing with all the legal maneuvering that will entail (and costs to be born by the common shareholders) and full adjudication of their claims.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Ha ha ha....Nobody owns millions of rabbits! Not sure how that affects GERS PPS, but it's funny!

    ReplyDelete
  19. What exactly is to appeal? Tried an lost same arguments over an again. The answer NOTHING!

    ReplyDelete
  20. You need to do some research on the US legal system. If there is a SJ that will can and will be appealed. If there is a trial either verdict for or against GERS will be appealed. The appeal consumes many months, sometimes years. If you have "invested" here not knowing of this reality you now have a rude awakening. I am not at stating that the defnedmts will win the appeal, only that we are long way from the closure needed to start the PPS moving up, ending dilution, and increasing client base.

    ReplyDelete
  21. While/if the appeals go on the infringing contraptions likely will be shut down. No one is going to borrow the infringers any money. Many things go into it but the pressure to settle will be very overwhelming. Infringers will be forced to clear their books of the matter to stay in business. This is why most of these things get settled.

    In a funny way the defendants like the suppliers being in such a terrible position almost works against settlement. What have they got to lose delaying the inevitable?

    ReplyDelete
  22. You need to research an answer what's there to appeal? NOTHING! cooked goose You appeal if YOU LOST! no grounds for it NONE!

    ReplyDelete
  23. This is not about winning the lawsuit, it is about delaying to the point that GERS goes out of business and the suit becomes moot. Your argument is vacuous and inconsistent with the "David vs, Goliath" defense, so often employed in these settings. Why do you think the Apple/Samsung case was resolved in less a third of the time this suit has taken so far? Neither was a "David".

    ReplyDelete
  24. Yea from ICM's pov. Winning is what it's all about from GERS pov.
    Growing sales and cash, customers/ extended maturity dates. GERS ain't going out. ICM hopes were dashed 4 years ago on that one.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete