Much of the‘037 Defendants’ motion rests upon a mistake of a basic principle of patent law.
What the ‘037 Defendants claim are “false statements” are derived from their misapprehension of this basic aspect of the law regarding Section 102(e).
GERS Extension HERE
List of Evidence Here
"In support of this motion, CleanTech states that the undisputed facts demonstrate that Defendant’s process falls within the asserted claims. It cannot be disputed . . ."
See hereSkunK
Delay, delay, followed by more delays. The only ones profiting are the attorneys. EXPECT A NEW ROUND OF DILUTION DUMPING NEXT WEEK TO PAY THESE BILLS.
ReplyDeleteThe vandergriends surely ain't profiting either. Digging a deeper grave to bury their business in.
ReplyDeleteDigging to bury your company in.
ReplyDeleteNobody is a cellar boxer.
ReplyDeleteWhat typically happens in these situations is that the victim company has to massively dilute its share structure from the constant paying of the monthly burn rate with money received from the selling of “real” shares at artificially low levels. Then the goal of the naked short sellers is to point out to the investors, usually via paid “Internet bashers”, that with the, let’s say, 50 billion shares currently issued and outstanding, that this lousy company is not worth the $5 million market cap it is trading at, especially if it is just a shell company whose primary business plan was wiped out by the naked short sellers’ tortuous interference earlier on.
Wow...that is about weak aas it gets for the Greenshit folks. Good luck with that arguement...looks like Dave and others was just looking to cut Cantrell out of the deal. Say what they want but it reads like that.
ReplyDeleteWho's the last ICM CLOWN that just posted? Learn how to spell dumb ass.
ReplyDeletepix.bk- new low
ReplyDeleteAny insightful thoughts of KK giving up control of GERS last week? This opens several directions that KK was very much against. KK never would have agreed on a BK filing as long as he could sell stock and keep the company going. KK would have never agreed to a buy-out and having GERS absorbed by another company. It is noteworthy that he has has given up another dream for his father's company. In an article in a NY business periodical around 2008 (GE funding initiated the story?) he stated that his dream was to be the CEO of GERS as it was listed on NASDAQ. For this reason, I do not believe that this change is innocuous, just a shuffling of names on placards. Go to the SEC website ans you will see that for public companies the definitions of CEO and Chairman are precisely defined and separate functions.
ReplyDeleteThere has been some speculation that this change was necessary to attract new financing. There has been rumors that there has been inner circle dissension as well. These are also plausible reasons that may have contributed to last week's news. Another was KK's too close for comfort relationship with YAGI.
This is probably not a complete list of realistic contributors to this action. Most of them however, with the exception of BK filing, would be favorable to us. I believe that folks who have spent a lot of time writing about "fluff" issues, their beliefs, hopes, etc, have not grasped that this may be the most important news since the announcement of GE funding (which subsequently fell through due to the Great Recession) in 2008. Yes, more important than the Markman rulings since those will take many months, even years to translate into the cash needed now to get out from under YAGI and to stop the dilution.
Funny how one JERK can spread a rumor about all the other "rumors" and expect everyone to take his "assumptions" as gospel!
ReplyDeleteI see that you continue to abuse yourself -- is it still fun?
ReplyDeleterumor: n0b0dy is a gaylord from galaynd usa. he dont know trade losted lots money and now cry on message boards.sorryiest investor ever met HAHAHHAHA sucker
ReplyDeleteAs you read here (first comment of this section), the dilution dump of 14,000,000 shares has occurred and not surprisingly in the face of an "up-tick". As I have stated several times, you can always count on a dilution salvo being fired into any up-tick. This is why the PPS is down 99.25% in the last 10 months! You can forget about the ancient history that it is down 99.99999% in the last six years -- 99.25% already this year. They must keep that dilution salvo cannon well oiled waiting for any "up-tick".
ReplyDeleteamtx.bk- @ 52 week low
ReplyDeletePetal,
ReplyDeleteWas that your $6 (+ $5 commission) so we could close on a "high" of 0.004 for the day?
Last: 0.0004
ReplyDeleteChange: +0.0001 (33.33%)
Bid/Size: 0.0003/6,411,696
Ask/Size: 0.0004/1,920,000
Volume: 17,496,595
52 week high: 0.05
52 week low: 0.0001
n0b0dy still looser hahahhaa cant trade cry about gers all day wife mad he small
ReplyDelete