Tuesday, September 24, 2013

ICM Filing Rejected

ICM's reply to the Court of Appeals' request for a specific non-filed filing was apparently filed improperly and was rejected.  At least that is what the court said.  ICM has not yet weighted in on the court's opinion.  Perhaps it is the court that is unaware of how to properly file. 

I will withhold my SkunK judgment until ICM responds. 

See Here

Serendipity?
The court discovers ICM's papers unsearchable.  Team GreenShift collectively exhales "duh!".

SkunK

Writ of Desipientia?

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

stock holders hell week once again

nobody123789 said...

Remember the only ones getting paid for sure are the attorneys and the judges AND we are paying for GERS' legal costs. Every motion, every piece of paper should have a cash register ringing in our ears, as withdrawals are taken from our equity.

Anonymous said...

pix.bk 52 week low ▼-0.05 3.52

nobody123789 said...

What satisfaction do you get from a potential client going BK? I don't understand the vindictive threat. Sounds like something we would hear from KK's family about their vendetta; if they were allowed to speak.

Anonymous said...

What satisfaction do YOU get from constantly rooting for GERS to fail?

nobody123789 said...

Buddy,

You have no idea what "rooting" means. I am avowed long-range supporter of GERS who is very willing to discuss the severe near-term challenges that must be overcome if the long-range is ever to appear on the horizon. That is objective, buddy. Perhaps you should try it, instead of hoping against hope and not understanding why things do not transpire as you have hoped; a much healthier approach -- both financially and psychologically.

Anonymous said...

n0b0dy crying again every post l;ost lot moneiy haha suker

Anonymous said...

pix.bk new 52 week low ▼-0.10 3.47

Anonymous said...

n0b0dy first on eveyr post lol loser time to ask icm for raise, cant trade

 
Free Blog CounterTamron