I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
Hmm? when is settlement coming, have they won the first round? come on we might get hit by some rock from space or terrorist or ww3 or another r/s.......
If you are talking about KK and/or YAGI walking away with all the marbles as being extreme or theoretical at best, see I-Hub post #35373. Here such an outcome is documented for another company. If it can be done legally, to say that it can't be done is foolish.
Do you have any documentation that this is what KK is planning? You criticize Slash for making remarks that cannot be supported, then, you do the same thing! What a hypocrite! Stick to the facts, not a bunch of bull based on another company.
If you are unable to determine the difference in tone and objectivity between my remarks and those of Slash, then English must be a second language for you. For example, the implicit assumption that any court award will be used to repay the YAGI loan is taken as fact. I point out a range of outcomes that could occur and that have not been considered by most. I make no predictions. The only hypocrites here are the ostriches that only want to read what they want to read, and that is plain stupid.
Again, I state that if an action is legal to discount its occurrence is the highest form self-destructive arrogance. I would like for you or any one else to delve into the legality of such an outcome and assure many of us that it is not. Since no one wants to address that question with any authority, I must assume that it is and folks currently holding GERS common shares do not want others to know that so that they can sucker them into buying and increasing their equity.
One certain fact; as the hype and hyperbole increase the PPS falls and has done so not only for the past eight months but for the past eight years. Some where in that fact must be an objective lesson about what the rest of the world thinks about GERS' prospects on a real time basis -- including today after another weekend of hype and hyperbole.
I just reviewed the details of this new patent. The offer to test "evidence" was submitted and reviewed by the USPTO. Their issuance of this patent in consideration of the letter speaks volumes about the defendants last stance/chance.
The court will side with the USPTO and uphold GERS' patents.
Hmm? when is settlement coming, have they won the first round? come on we might get hit by some rock from space or terrorist or ww3 or another r/s.......
ReplyDeleteIf you are talking about KK and/or YAGI walking away with all the marbles as being extreme or theoretical at best, see I-Hub post #35373. Here such an outcome is documented for another company. If it can be done legally, to say that it can't be done is foolish.
ReplyDeleteDo you have any documentation that this is what KK is planning? You criticize Slash for making remarks that cannot be supported, then, you do the same thing! What a hypocrite! Stick to the facts, not a bunch of bull based on another company.
ReplyDeleteIf you are unable to determine the difference in tone and objectivity between my remarks and those of Slash, then English must be a second language for you. For example, the implicit assumption that any court award will be used to repay the YAGI loan is taken as fact. I point out a range of outcomes that could occur and that have not been considered by most. I make no predictions. The only hypocrites here are the ostriches that only want to read what they want to read, and that is plain stupid.
ReplyDeleteAgain, I state that if an action is legal to discount its occurrence is the highest form self-destructive arrogance. I would like for you or any one else to delve into the legality of such an outcome and assure many of us that it is not. Since no one wants to address that question with any authority, I must assume that it is and folks currently holding GERS common shares do not want others to know that so that they can sucker them into buying and increasing their equity.
The only thing you need worry about is gers walking away with Icm.
ReplyDeleteOne certain fact; as the hype and hyperbole increase the PPS falls and has done so not only for the past eight months but for the past eight years. Some where in that fact must be an objective lesson about what the rest of the world thinks about GERS' prospects on a real time basis -- including today after another weekend of hype and hyperbole.
ReplyDeletequack/\ parrot on crack/\quack
ReplyDeleteI am reminded of the ages-old adage that people impute themselves as they project their vices on others.
ReplyDeletequack/\ parrot on crack/\quack quack
ReplyDeleteBe careful, this parrot may bite you in the pocket book, not just your fingers.
ReplyDeletequack quack/\ parrot on crack/\ bit your dick off quack quack
ReplyDeleteLOL...It's very good to hear from you Skribe!
ReplyDeleteI have a standing order in for another million shares. If they post a profit this week, this takes off, IMO.
We have a lot of traders looking at this from the PEIX board...
Your standing order must be for less than 0.0013 a share -- that's a real endorsement of confidence?
ReplyDeleteI just reviewed the details of this new patent. The offer to test "evidence" was submitted and reviewed by the USPTO. Their issuance of this patent in consideration of the letter speaks volumes about the defendants last stance/chance.
ReplyDeleteThe court will side with the USPTO and uphold GERS' patents.