I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
An entirely expected outcome given the attorney privilege that courts are loathe to violate. The filing of this subpoena speaks to the real possibility that the attorneys are feathering their nests at our expense; instead of "sauces, gooses and ganders". Given the misdirection it is clear that we are going down for the count -- soon!
Do you know what you see if you open a coffin after it has been buried for a few months?
GGGRRRREEEEEEEEEEENNNNNN!
The "Green" that you are seeing is the fungus associated with the putrefaction and decay of the carcass of a once viable concept for making money and developing a robust business.
Cardinal and ICM appear to rely solely on the hope that the court will invalidate GreenShift’s patents based entirely on information considered and rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) prior to the issuance of GreenShift’s patents. GreenShift believes that this argument is especially weak and that it must fail. Cardinal and ICM argue that GreenShift’s inventions were obvious and unpatentable. That is simply not the case. ICM previously raised the information that it believed invalidated GreenShift’s invention and failed – the PTO considered and rejected the materials raised by ICM prior to the issuance of GreenShift’s first two patents in October 2009. Any producer that relies upon ICM’s continued claims of invalidity does so at its own peril.
when mr b obtained the email and other information lools imprtant to me as his objections, whether in court or to the pto directly, ... would be considred by the pto prior to issuance. SANDBAGGING!
Cardinal and ICM appear to rely solely on the hope that the court will invalidate GreenShift’s patents based entirely on information considered and rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) prior to the issuance of GreenShift’s patents. GreenShift believes that this argument is especially weak and that it must fail. Cardinal and ICM argue that GreenShift’s inventions were obvious and unpatentable. That is simply not the case. ICM previously raised the information that it believed invalidated GreenShift’s invention and failed – the PTO considered and rejected the materials raised by ICM prior to the issuance of GreenShift’s first two patents in October 2009. Any producer that relies upon ICM’s continued claims of invalidity does so at its own peril.
when mr b obtained the email and other information lools imprtant to me as his objections, whether in court or to the pto directly, ... would be considred by the pto prior to issuance. SANDBAGGING!
That is a court imposed settlement conference. Neither side is interested in settling on the others terms, both believe that they are right. Failure to come to settlement, which is very likely, will only serve to put more market pressure on the price per share. Issues such as loan default will surface again as well as the need for another reverse split as the price per share falls towards the par value. Advice: don't be looking forward to the "Settlement Conference", or be careful what you are asking for -- only the attorneys and KK are getting paid here unless we get very lucky. Frankly, the motion that described besmirching one of our attorneys character as a reason to breach attorney-client privilege was an embarrassment and utter waste of our money.
I think that we just heard from one of CC's attorneys or paralegals. Sad that they can charge us (billable hours) for trolling these repositories of the inane.
You are correct all that the defense claims is a defense has been submitted to the USPTO and asked to reconsider the patent. They have and they did reconfirm its validity. Generally, the courts will yield to the USPTO as the professionals in this determination. The question is not the validity of the patents but whether they have been violated. The question for us is how long will it take for this to end, and how many reverse splits will that take, or more ominously will YAGI put GERS in default before they win and can pay off the debt?
An entirely expected outcome given the attorney privilege that courts are loathe to violate. The filing of this subpoena speaks to the real possibility that the attorneys are feathering their nests at our expense; instead of "sauces, gooses and ganders". Given the misdirection it is clear that we are going down for the count -- soon!
ReplyDeleteThe worm is definitely turning and devouring our dead carcass. This really hurts. Where is Slash when we need him?
ReplyDeletebla-bla ....babla..... --> 20 days ----> 0.0001 $!$!$!$!$
ReplyDeleteActually,
ReplyDeletebla-bla ....babla..... --> 19 days ----> 0.0001 $!$!$!$!$
oh... sorry... 19 days yeees
ReplyDelete101 0.0016 $!$!$!$!$!$$$$$
ReplyDeletedonkey boy anonys^^^
ReplyDelete"donkey boy anonys^^^"
ReplyDeleteThe only "ass" (as in donkey) getting reamed is here is that of the common shareholder. Bankrupt by end of year -- mark this post.
hihihi donkey
ReplyDeleteGGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
ReplyDeleteG
ReplyDeleteG
G
G
R
R
R
R
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
GGGGGRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
ReplyDeleteDo you know what you see if you open a coffin after it has been buried for a few months?
ReplyDeleteGGGRRRREEEEEEEEEEENNNNNN!
The "Green" that you are seeing is the fungus associated with the putrefaction and decay of the carcass of a once viable concept for making money and developing a robust business.
db^^
ReplyDelete8300000 bid !
ReplyDeleten0b0dy sellout pissed its green
ReplyDeleteGreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteLawyers not present , it will make the victory all the more sweet. Go Big green.
ReplyDeleteCardinal and ICM appear to rely solely on the hope that the court will invalidate GreenShift’s patents based entirely on information considered and rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) prior to the issuance of GreenShift’s patents. GreenShift believes that this argument is especially weak and that it must fail. Cardinal and ICM argue that GreenShift’s inventions were obvious and unpatentable. That is simply not the case. ICM previously raised the information that it believed invalidated GreenShift’s invention and failed – the PTO considered and rejected the materials raised by ICM prior to the issuance of GreenShift’s first two patents in October 2009. Any producer that relies upon ICM’s continued claims of invalidity does so at its own peril.
ReplyDeletewhen mr b obtained the email and other information lools imprtant to me as his objections, whether in court or to the pto directly, ... would be considred by the pto prior to issuance. SANDBAGGING!
i dont think the magistrate grasped the idea.
Cardinal and ICM appear to rely solely on the hope that the court will invalidate GreenShift’s patents based entirely on information considered and rejected by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) prior to the issuance of GreenShift’s patents. GreenShift believes that this argument is especially weak and that it must fail. Cardinal and ICM argue that GreenShift’s inventions were obvious and unpatentable. That is simply not the case. ICM previously raised the information that it believed invalidated GreenShift’s invention and failed – the PTO considered and rejected the materials raised by ICM prior to the issuance of GreenShift’s first two patents in October 2009. Any producer that relies upon ICM’s continued claims of invalidity does so at its own peril.
ReplyDeletewhen mr b obtained the email and other information lools imprtant to me as his objections, whether in court or to the pto directly, ... would be considred by the pto prior to issuance. SANDBAGGING!
i dont think the magistrate grasped the idea.
Well, the judges and the magistrates' opinions are the ONLY ones that count.
ReplyDeletetheir opinions get reversed and modified so often that i dont think they COUNT for very much.
ReplyDelete20 days until settlement conference. The facts will be validated.
ReplyDeleteAgreed 9:26 markmen claims come to mind
ReplyDeletebla-bla ....babla..... --> 18 days ----> 0.0001 $!$!$!$!$
ReplyDeleteThat is a court imposed settlement conference. Neither side is interested in settling on the others terms, both believe that they are right. Failure to come to settlement, which is very likely, will only serve to put more market pressure on the price per share. Issues such as loan default will surface again as well as the need for another reverse split as the price per share falls towards the par value. Advice: don't be looking forward to the "Settlement Conference", or be careful what you are asking for -- only the attorneys and KK are getting paid here unless we get very lucky. Frankly, the motion that described besmirching one of our attorneys character as a reason to breach attorney-client privilege was an embarrassment and utter waste of our money.
ReplyDelete... the magistrate's opinion was the embarrassment.
ReplyDeleteI think that we just heard from one of CC's attorneys or paralegals. Sad that they can charge us (billable hours) for trolling these repositories of the inane.
ReplyDeleteThe pto already considered the letter. Icm is shit out of luck.
ReplyDeleteYou are correct all that the defense claims is a defense has been submitted to the USPTO and asked to reconsider the patent. They have and they did reconfirm its validity. Generally, the courts will yield to the USPTO as the professionals in this determination. The question is not the validity of the patents but whether they have been violated. The question for us is how long will it take for this to end, and how many reverse splits will that take, or more ominously will YAGI put GERS in default before they win and can pay off the debt?
ReplyDeletedb^^
ReplyDeletewrong again 947
ReplyDeleteThe noose is tight
ReplyDeletehands are bound
the floor door opens today
now he can watch what he built hang and rot away
Rip ICM