Sunday, July 14, 2013

Small Slice of a Big Pizza

GreenShift has recently filed additional Patent Infringement Litigation against Pacific Ethanol, Inc.; Guardian Energy, LLC; and now Western New York Energy, LLC.  In each case the filing was done by local attorneys in local District Federal courts.  To some this suggested a falling out with our major patent attorney - to others this was par for the course.  The second opinion was that GreenShift had simply used local lawyers, officers in good standing with the local District Court, to begin initial filings.  This saves time, travel and money.

I submit the following related evidence in support of the second option.  It appears the relationship between GreenShift and their main Patent Law Firm remains strong. 

Here is ANOTHER GERS COES patent application - that as it approaches completion - is being transferred from the initial Patent Attorney to the main national patent attorney law firm: Cantor and Colburn LLP.

Power of Attorney recently withdrawn

Power of Attorney Accepted by Cantor and Colburn

SkunK

What may be more significant than my offerings above is that GreenShift believes that this Patent Application is a tool worthy of our Blacksmith.  I do not see this being handed to Cantor and Colburn unless GreenShift thought it to be both:  1. Headed to allowance; and 2. A hammer that can forge and temper some red hot justice.

33 comments:

  1. Skunk -- bow in quiver? As a skunk you may want the bow in the quiver, but as an analogy I think that arrows would fit better.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No hope left for Icm

    ReplyDelete
  3. The noose is tight
    hands are bound
    the floor door opens today

    now he can watch what he built hang and rot away

    Rip ICM

    ReplyDelete
  4. Skunk -- bow in quiver?

    Good Catch. I always have trouble cross decking metaphors from my skiff to my dinghy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. All true in the LONG term. In the short term we now have multiple law firms that must be paid, with new retainers not covered by the $50,000/month agreement with C & C. In the short term more dilution.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unless they got more income than before, which seems likely.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wishful thinking that will be tested in a month when the Q2 is filed.

    ReplyDelete
  8. GGGGGGRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

    ReplyDelete
  9. contradictory thought processes emanating from falsehood = dumb ass

    ReplyDelete
  10. That is why the price per share is 0.0016? All the falsehoods in the market place?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sunk -- Justice? You know better, these suits are never about justice. They are about money and satisfying legal jurisprudence. Someone's rights always gets trampled in this stampede. In this case we, the common shareholders are the likely victims.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes, as I said above the market agrees and why this is selling for sub penny. Almost everyone but a few longs understands that they are going to be victimized. This fact has nothing to do with the lynching of ICM or the decapitation of PEIX or any of the other wrong doers. They will get their due, but we will not get ours. The tap dances on the graves of the wrong doers, the rejoicing over their pain will be all that we will recover from this "Justice". Enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "All true in the LONG term. In the short term we now have multiple law firms that must be paid, with new retainers not covered by the $50,000/month agreement with C & C. In the short term more dilution."

    Right on schedule -- a dump to pay these bills and a new all-time low. Don't be too excited about the Q2!

    ReplyDelete
  14. i have to wait for the reports to see how the company has done in the past and speculate about the future

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am finally fully demoralized...it only goes down by huge amounts...I actually hate gers

    ReplyDelete
  16. "Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value",

    From the 10K. We are entering sub par value range, expect an announcement soon of another reverse split to be executed by end of the year. There are significant penalties when selling price (price per share) is below the par value.

    ReplyDelete
  17. You are kidding? That is like screaming with joy that ground is only eight feet away when the rope around your neck is a foot long!

    ReplyDelete
  18. I just saw a description of GERS business: Litigation, patent filing, dilution, and non marketing of superior technology.

    ReplyDelete
  19. dipchit donkey boy posting anony Icm basher

    ReplyDelete
  20. $10 trade @ .001 get real

    ReplyDelete
  21. You are going to be singing that song all the way down to 0.001 after the next reverse split. Not too many singing with you KK, maybe you need to find some more suckers, the current crew may no longer be buyers. What are you going to do for a business model when you can't sell shares? Work for a living?

    ReplyDelete
  22. pps back up after $10 trade

    ReplyDelete
  23. preferred stock doesn't trade

    common stock par value .0001

    ReplyDelete
  24. spoken like a true Icm bashing nobody

    ReplyDelete
  25. $10 trade! That was a 1.5 million share dump to generate $2K for filing fees. Wait until the cost of the new retainers hits the market.

    ReplyDelete
  26. wrong again sucker $10 trade @ .001

    ReplyDelete
  27. KK don't post here, he's too busy kicking your ass in court.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Summary judgment motion tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Settlement conference in 7 days.

    ReplyDelete
  30. GS signed another licensee on.

    ReplyDelete