Here is the evidence GreenShift has put forward in support of infringement. One hundred thirty nine exhibits are now before the court.
SkunK
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
3 comments:
Focused. unlike the large, diversified law firms with which we compete, morganti legal, P.C. only focuses ON competition and shareholder disputes.
We provide our services to individuals, families, investors, and small business owners. we also align our interests with our clients in that we only provide our services on fixed rates per project or contingency Fees.
The firm’s offices in canada and united states allow us to offer clients legal services with a truly cross-border perspective:
Am I mistaken, hasn't GERS already submitted this material to the USPTO in its request for reassessment of the validity of the patents? If so, why should GERS care about it being documented again? This appears as frivolous and not necessary and places a cloud over the legitimacy of the patent in the eyes of the court that has already been evaluated -- twice.
no, yes, i dont think they do, really, except that it protracts litigation, and yes, a cloud ... of smoke and mirrors ... until her highness addresses the elephant in the living room, imo.
Post a Comment