I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
Having read the Defendents Response, I am going back to bed to rest awhile until Nobody tells me what to think. And how this is the Latest Disaster for GERS! DHOLE
Once again the infringers would like to construe claim construction in their favor. They have not been too lucky with that so far and I am not sure it is going to start going their way now. I am sure the Greenshift legal team will have a great reply in due course as they have many times already.
The main question for common shareholders is how many zillion more shares will we have been diluted by the time money changes hands?
There were many here that insisted two years ago that this current round of litigation would be over by October of last year. Well, that date has come and gone and there is no real endpoint on the horizon. Those that say there is may be the same who insisted two years ago that we would be done by now. Too much legal wrangling ahead. Remember, the underpinning of the court system is to prevent GERS from raising an army to attack ICM's army. In other words, it is a PROCESS to settle our differences and the process will always be served and JUSTICE as some here are calling for may be secondary. If a few hundred (or more) common shareholders of GERS lose their investment (through dilution, loss of usurped earnings, etc.) while the process is served that may be unjust to us but of no consequence to the courts.
This assumption that the rights of the common shareholders will be preserved in the end is one of the concepts I include in the phrase "unrequited expectations". The inner circle's rights (through their preferred shares) will be preserved but not necessarily ours -- and that leads to the real question for us.
Any one thinking that since we are only a half cent away from an all time low (PPS) that our ship is going to sail soon, better take a good look at her name. It is not the good ship "GERSlander" but an incantation of the "Titanic".
Having read the Defendents Response, I am going back to bed to rest awhile until Nobody tells me what to think. And how this is the Latest Disaster for GERS! DHOLE
ReplyDeleteOnce again the infringers would like to construe claim construction in their favor. They have not been too lucky with that so far and I am not sure it is going to start going their way now. I am sure the Greenshift legal team will have a great reply in due course as they have many times already.
ReplyDeleteGerry
More of the same delay, delay, followed by more delay as we suffer dilution, dilution, followed by more dilution.
ReplyDeletejoint investors? sloppy lawering
ReplyDeletecocentrated this stillage? their lawyers illiterate
ReplyDeletesounds like noboy wrote it
ReplyDeleteThe main question for common shareholders is how many zillion more shares will we have been diluted by the time money changes hands?
ReplyDeleteThere were many here that insisted two years ago that this current round of litigation would be over by October of last year. Well, that date has come and gone and there is no real endpoint on the horizon. Those that say there is may be the same who insisted two years ago that we would be done by now. Too much legal wrangling ahead. Remember, the underpinning of the court system is to prevent GERS from raising an army to attack ICM's army. In other words, it is a PROCESS to settle our differences and the process will always be served and JUSTICE as some here are calling for may be secondary. If a few hundred (or more) common shareholders of GERS lose their investment (through dilution, loss of usurped earnings, etc.) while the process is served that may be unjust to us but of no consequence to the courts.
This assumption that the rights of the common shareholders will be preserved in the end is one of the concepts I include in the phrase "unrequited expectations". The inner circle's rights (through their preferred shares) will be preserved but not necessarily ours -- and that leads to the real question for us.
GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN
ReplyDeleteWrong "G", GPRE is GREEEEEEEN, not GERS.
ReplyDeleteGREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN
ReplyDeleteAny one thinking that since we are only a half cent away from an all time low (PPS) that our ship is going to sail soon, better take a good look at her name. It is not the good ship "GERSlander" but an incantation of the "Titanic".
ReplyDeleteI think I have an old photograph of you, drilling holes in the hull of the titanic. Some people never change!
ReplyDeletenob0dy really scared bashing hard last few weeks, even called transfer agent, desperati0n....if 50 cent per p0st dont work wife back to bunny ranch.
ReplyDeletegood luck all
$!$!$!$!$!$$$$$$$$$$
GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN
ReplyDeletenob0dy really scared bashing hard last few weeks, even called transfer agent, desperati0n....if 50 cent per p0st dont work wife back to bunny ranch.
ReplyDeletegood luck all
$!$!$!$!$!$$$$$$$$$$
wheres donkey boy hide when stock runs
ReplyDelete