This COES patent application filed in April and published on 9 August also covers chemical additives. Additives both as enzymes and additives used to adjust the pH. (30-32, 38, 39)
See Here
New, broader wording in this second one:
". . . recovering at least a portion of the oil-containing portion from the concentrated byproduct . . ."
See Here
SkunK
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
70 comments:
ICM....has lost....GERS has covered all bases!
glta
Tech,
This is an attempt to cover all the bases. We are many months away from the USPTO certifying the application. Doesn't this indicate that these bases may not now be covered?
nobody wants our lawyers to stop his sugar daddy is crying uncle
nobody covered all the bases with his mom
It means that the defenses "letter" was a flop. Patents are untouchable.
I suggest that you do some reading before engaging in hopeful, wishful lip flapping.
http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/ppo_textonly.jsp
send the link to your boss gers knows how to get patents poet don't
Good one 10:53
What happened to Poet? Last I heard they wanted a patent for this.
Leibert
poet didnt get it^
time to sue poet
Not that I don't believe do you have a link?
Leibert
It is somewhere on the Skunk Blog.
jjwood worker123 your wife was great you're an idiot glta
if icm et al end up out of business, i wonder who will fill that void ..... maybe the one owed all the M O N E Y ?
Noteworthy from the patent application:
Additional plants presently under construction are "expected to add billions of gallons to this total in an effort to meet the current high demand."
It was referencing Ethanol.
to Leibert 12208127
http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/!ut/p/c5/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP0os3hff1NDc1NLYwN3SzcDA08PwyD_YF8zINcYKB-JW97AiCLdBgR0h4Nci992vPIGEHkDHMDRQN_PIz83VT9SP8ocpylGZvqROanpicmV-gW5oREGmQEZgY6KigBnIW_S/dl3/d3/L0lJSklna21DU1EhIS9JRGpBQU15QUJFUkNKRXFnLzRGR2dzbzBWdnphOUlBOW9JQSEhLzdfTU81MTc1OTMwRzlGMDBJSDFST1NNNjMwMjYvQUl4OXI3MTQwMDA4L3NhLmdldEJpYg!!/
link broke^
to Leibert 12208127
http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
what fact is there that says dilution has ended?
i keep seeing the trading volume to be one half of the volume contained within the 60 minute bars when added up...
so that tells me that 50% of the shares are not trading but added in as dilution..
what else can be concluded?..that is what the volume numbers are saying
glta..long
G
O
G
R
S
doesnt/wont sj motion 9/15 indicate all bases ARE covered?
wow 128000 buy
they covered all the bases now they'll sj motion
Anony 2:31,
That only $3200, this ain't AAPL. Most of the longs here have that many shares rolling around in their sock drawers. I think I found that many when I vacuumed the couch this weekend.
I bet 3 or 4 this week then litttle resistence to .09
TraderX2000
Brave man/woman. The week will tell.
Has anybody traded call options here?
TraderX2000
nah
nah
nah
nah
NAH
NAH
NAH
NAH
D
I
L
T
I
O
N
G
O
O
D
B
Y
E
nah
nah
nah
nah
NAH
NAH
NAH
NAH
D
I
L
T
I
O
N
G
O
O
D
B
Y
E
nah
nah
nah
nah
NAH
NAH
NAH
NAH
D
I
L
U
T
O
N
G
O
O
D
B
Y
E
ask 3.4
Comment deleted
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
"nobodys mom is a whore, she needs to cease the dilusion"
Any one been to the GERS web site lately? You know the place where most potential investors would start collecting information on GERS (it certainly would not be the message boards if they were real investors). Go over take a look, the last link to the improving financial picture of GERS, that any potential investor would want to have, is for the Q3 2011 SEC filing. How much effort would it be to provide potential investors this important information? How dissuasive is it not to find any recent SEC filings? In this case, you be the judge.
no trouble herehttp://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001269127&owner=exclude&count=40
You are missing the point! This information, which was offered on the web site through Q3 of last year, should be updated for at least two reasons: 1) to provide prospective investors easy access to this important information that provides data on the growth of GERS and, 2)the lack of this information and the out-of-date appearance that this engenders may speak volumes to some about the quality of the company and/or its relationship with investors
desperate dipchit donkey boy hee haw^
Why don't you suggest the GERS website develop a chat room. That way, you and your band of yahoo misfits could take that over too!
LOOL nobody and his tool friends
Post a Comment