Wednesday, September 5, 2012

GERS Motion to Seal Granted

SEE HERE

SkunK

93 comments:

  1. For what possible reasons would gers want to seal their opposition yo defendents motion for summary judgement of non -infringement? Why would they hide it from public domain? Is it too simplistic to think it could be a settlement? Jeff

    ReplyDelete
  2. Don't think it's a settlement

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are missing the point! This information, which was offered on the web site through Q3 of last year, should be updated for at least two reasons: 1) to provide prospective investors easy access to this important information that provides data on the growth of GERS and, 2)the lack of this information and the out-of-date appearance that this engenders may speak volumes to some about the quality of the company and/or its relationship with investors.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nobody, to your point, i agree with you. If this were a larger company, the lack of updates would be inexcusable. It does not foster confidence by prospective investors. I do not personally think that commons are very high on their priority list right now, and i recognize that. At the same time, this lack of self -promotion is keeping the pps down and allowing me to load up. After all, the company is in a fight for it's survival, i can look past this. I believe the 10q's will speak for themselves in time. As for now, this stock is a wellkept secret from general public, i for one am leveragingthe fact and will continue to buy shares on sale....appreciate your input for perspective..respectfully, Jeff

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree, but I would caution that I think the rewards are a little more distant. The next several filings will be important as the litigation will continue to percolate into the foreseeable future when all appeals and motions have finally been resolved. I do not think that there will be a settlement where money (awards and damages are paid, acknowledgement of primacy of GERS' technology occurs) changes hands. Thus the SEC filings are so important. But progress has not been monotonic and for each step forward we have seen a step backward in the quarterlies. We must keep forward progress going to stimulate the PPS, otherwise, the litigation success, ignition that many believe is ultimately inevitable, is far on the horizon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You keep harping on the fact that short term prosperity is not imminent. Not everyone here is banking on that. Some of us understand this may take time. You repeat yourself all the time. Not all of us are in our golden years.
    Nycdream

    ReplyDelete
  7. The pto agrees the patents are GOOD and Icms letter was BS. Icm has NOTHING every thing Icm said is PROVED WRONG !! Judge is gonna slap them like a red headed step child with injunctions + sj.

    ReplyDelete
  8. what are you miss cleo? get your crystal ball out you know nothing what this will do if you can predict the future you would be bashing a penny stock your whole life? loser

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nobody check the newest patent out. The defenses hopes an dreams of noninfringement went up in smoke.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think it would be instructive if the Skunk put out a poll about how long the litigation to protect their intellectual property will take. This could be done in a couple of parts: a) current district court adjudication, b) completion of all appeals and motions in this litigation and payment of award and punitive damages, c)the complete end of all such litigation e.g. Poet & Cargill. The range of duration for a) could be several months to several years, for b) several years to more than five years, and for c) five years to more than a decade. The responses to this survey would, in my judgement, indicate for this sample how mistaken and naive most are on the timing here.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There is no new patent, there is a new patent application. And this has nothing to do with ICM's strategy of delaying this litigation beyond GERS' ability to survive. Have you noticed how much longer it is taking this litigation than the Apple/ Samsung litigation? Reason -- Samsung knew that Apple would not fail to survive if they lost; the delaying tactic would be fruitless.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Why would they want to delay. Gers is not going out of business plus we will win and damages are building son what's there point

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jeff,

    To my point, that there are unrealistic expectations here in terms of timing. Many folks are waiting for September 15th as some sort of "miracle day" to propel the PPS to move north. This is the day that GERS' motion for SJ is due. When that day passes and nothing happens I think that there will be an excellent buying opportunity as some of the folks frustrated with their unrequited expectations will jettison their stock. I am counting on this mindset and behavior to add to my LONG position.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anony 9:16,

    I am afraid that you haven't been paying attention. I know based on direct conversation with several of the principals that they believe that DVG is unrealistic . DVG believes that he is right and that GERS will become insolvent to the point where the common shareholders can no longer keep GERS' head above the YAGI waterline. If you need more insight, you will need to do a lot of reading on your own.

    ReplyDelete
  15. ^ haha you dont know shit, you didnt talk to anyone, you are nothing nobody

    ReplyDelete
  16. The idiots that populate this comment board says a great deal about the intelligence of some of the people that have been attracted to GERS. The sad commentary is that others reading these unintelligent and inarticulate posts may ascribe this low quality human response to the quality of GERS itself. After all, don't birds of a feather flock together?

    ReplyDelete
  17. wellyabutt, unless a mistake is made by the court, summary judgment (for GERS) means we win.
    ICM will then have to try to re-explain why it should not liable for (very clearly) pirating another company's technology. right?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yes, to the district court, then to Appellate Court in DC which has a history of looking at claims construction differently than the district courts. Frequently, (30+ %) the DC court sides with the appellant based on a technical legal issue that has nothing, I repeat, nothing to do with justice. Then there is still the opportunity to motion the Supreme Court to over turn the Appellate Court.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Why are you guys feeding this self-inflated egotistical maniac? He lives for what is probably the only real attention he gets on these boards. You will never convince him that someone else may have a valid, true opinion.

    As for the Yahoo munchkins, go home to the cesspool you crawled out of.

    ReplyDelete
  20. We have an idiot flooding message boards with "informative posts, really important questions, intellectual message board posts, I told you so posts" who invested 7 years ago in GERS that is telling others they are idiots. Man you can't make this up.


    6 years ago I already thought you were stark raving nuts but it keeps getting worse with you.



    ReplyDelete
  21. Who the heck needs to be convinced? The only thing that is needed is discourse based upon fact and not supposition. We can agree to disagree on the meaning of those facts. It is unacceptable to treat hopes and wishes as facts and expect to be able have a discourse. Your premise that the outcome of an intellectual engagement must end in one side convincing the other is a perfidious form of nihilism.

    ReplyDelete
  22. youre educated ... postulate one potential defect in the claim construction that would favor icm.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Nobody,

    How much have you lost since you invested in this over 6 years ago? Your anger and frustration still shows how stupid you were and now much more stupid you gotten since then.

    Sorry for your mishaps but don't share your misery with others on the board.

    Please leave as your opinions are not valued.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Oh goody, now that you were proved WRONG on the dilution kick, we get to listen to your "Blackout" crap for the next few months, AGAIN.

    Do you realize you've been advocating "long term profitability" for so long that it has actually now become long term?

    ReplyDelete
  25. For those of you who don't know the difference between "your" and "you're", why not just type "ur". That way you'll sound "text savvy" and the reader will still get the meaning (even if they don't know the difference either),

    ReplyDelete
  26. Perfidious......Ha ha ha! My wife bought some of that last week. It's that perfume with the hidious smell, right?

    ReplyDelete
  27. 1) Take a gander at the OS fully, diluted versus the OS basic, before you step into any more fecal waste of self aggrandizement. We will not know who/what is right until we determine what has/will happen to all those other millions of shares.
    2) I have known from the inception about the odds of my gamble here. Fully accepting and understanding those odds is something you should try. If you did then the concepts of anger and frustration which are clearly lodged in your limbic system would dissipate.
    3) I am not an attorney. My information on the percentage of appeals overturned is based solely on what the Appellate Court considers faulty claims constructions comes from professionals in this field, that work closely with this court. I have previously stated that this is an average over several years and a point estimate does not directly apply to the instant case. GERS will either prevail or it will not -- the outcome is binary. But the 30+ % figure is a measure of risk of failure for GERS at this level and may be what DVG is hanging his company's future on.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Read that all before....

    Do you keep all these comments in a word processing program so you can just copy and paste over, and over, and over, and over.......?

    ReplyDelete
  29. 3) seems superficial. statistics do not descend into individual case particulars, i.e., facts. i didnt know you gambled on "odds." thought you were a fact monger --- my mistake. nonetheless glad you havent been able to isolate one (1) single defect.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I am not knowledgeable in this field. My commentary on the quality of the claims construction would have no value as does your attempt to obtain my certification.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Nobody,

    You still have not answer the question on how much you have lost since you invested in this stock over 6 years ago.

    No comment? Wow, that bad. I understand your bashing and misery. Just so you know, you have been figured out.

    Sorry!

    ReplyDelete
  32. gambling and rebuking objective discourse. dam! had me fooled with that vocabulary. you should be on "talk" radio. or maybe run for office.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I haven't lost a dime, and will not.

    ReplyDelete
  34. It's only been 3 weeks since GERS last quarterly report, other than that, they're up to date with the Q1 from May.
    Try going to the correct website, or at least how to navigate one and quit spreading false information!

    ReplyDelete
  35. I normally wouldn't defend Nobody, but he is right about not losing a dime. I haven't either. You haven't lost or gained a dime unless you sell at a loss or at a gain. Average down or wait it out.

    P.S.
    Nobody, I still think you are condescending.

    ReplyDelete
  36. price on 120 min. chart is still tracing out within the widening rectangular box pattern....

    does it break above or below?
    wish i canoe
    glta

    ReplyDelete
  37. P.S.
    Nobody, I still think you are condescending.

    Nobody is NOT condescending.

    He just thinks he is the smartest person in the room. Or should I say the entire basement at his mother's house?

    ReplyDelete
  38. hey nobody i told u not to go to sanduskys house when you were younger
    smh _^_ :(

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anony 11:45,

    Or should I say misinformation spreader. Go to the main link "Presentation & Reports". If you can read you will see that there are several links to last year's filings, and just as I previously stated no links at all to any of this years's filings. Condescending crap! Stating facts and getting it right, that is what I am doing. Some one like yourself that is labeling valid statements as falsehoods must be working for the "team".

    ReplyDelete
  40. Jeff,

    Looks like we are right on. After the 15th we should be able to get some more bargain basement shares; trend is already emerging today.

    ReplyDelete
  41. gambling, rebuking objectivity, and have your head buried in the sand. look out for cat turds down there!

    ReplyDelete
  42. price on daily is today again below the 9ema....torture continues...

    this is BAD price action....strong stocks stay above 9ema for weeks on end....

    i am angry....thet is huge dilution today...add the hourly volume bars...you can do the arithmetic yourself..glta

    ReplyDelete
  43. youre a waste of time, air and space.

    ReplyDelete
  44. that was directed to nobuddy

    ReplyDelete
  45. ok well thnaks,

    i am long....but i am also very angry...i am telling you all that the dilution is occuring each and evert day....just add the hourly volumes, they are double the listed daily volume...that is the number of shares of net dilution...it was huge today about quater million shares...

    and since price is eroding we can assume that buyers are not accumulating with out any feeling of urgency...glta

    ReplyDelete
  46. the only chart positive is on the 120 minute chart....price is still carving out higher lows...that is all the good news i see..

    this stock is NOT showing any technical strenght....it must show something very soon or lowere lows are dead ahead...sorry, that is what price IS doing...of course the daily dilution is NOT helping matters at all!!!
    glta

    ReplyDelete
  47. Nobody,

    If you go to "Investor Resources" on the GERS webpage and then click on XBRL Reports you will find the Q1 report from May 2012. If you can't read it in that format, there is a link directly below it to read it at the EDGAR site.
    WRONG about the Q2 dilution and WRONG about only last years filings on the website!
    No wonder your little friends from yahoo like you so much. You're just like them!

    When you ride a bike, you have to......

    ReplyDelete
  48. somone made a great point on i-hub

    samsung/apple infringement settled rapidly due to apples infinite staying power...

    but gers is being bled by the lenghty battle which is ICM goal...very very ugly for justice

    ReplyDelete
  49. bottom line...price is eroding slowly since recent pop....this is just singularily NOT good...

    whether price is down due to sellers or dilution is irrelevent...
    price going down means and always means in an auction market that accumulation is not keeping up with distribution...that is it....price would go up if demand exceeded the distribution....distribution can be hoders selling or the gers company selling...does not matter,,,glta ...i am a pissed off long

    ReplyDelete
  50. Nobody,

    Yes you do state facts, over and over and over, but you are also condescending over and over and over.

    Condescending: showing or characterized by a patronizing or superior attitude toward others.

    Yep, that pretty much sounds like you.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Techgues you are babbling, please go and read some good books about charting and markets.
    This MB would be to small to do so myself.

    But for example that acc. distrb. thing you speak of is untrue. It could take 1 sold share without bid that could disguise millions of bought shares.
    Or in the case of a big buyer, you regularly and strategically sell also. No need to drive your own buying price up to much ain't so?

    ReplyDelete
  52. anony 2;41

    hope you are correct...i learned that when accumulation exceeds distribution price goes up in an auction bid/ask market...it is not a mystery as some claim...certainly not magic...

    all i am saying is price is going down lately...by definition supply exceeds demand...unless you think gers is special and magical...

    ReplyDelete
  53. on 30 minute chart lots of green candles....this may be accumulation....no idea

    ReplyDelete
  54. Looking good for picking up some cheap shares after September 15. Superior attitude, only possible when the attitude of those professing wishes and hopes as facts becomes measurable, which it is not.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Nobody, can come across as pessimistic, however, we could learn something from his experience. I have been in this stock for about 2.5 years. What i have learned is not to expect anything too soon from the company. I have a very solid core holding.. however i have changed my purchasing strategy, for all who would like to know. Now, i simply purchase $1,000 before end of each quarter to average down, and hope it eventually goes somewhere over the next few years. Of course, i would not be disappointed if something happened sooner, rather than later....Jeff

    ReplyDelete
  56. Nobody,
    You mean like you wishing and hoping the website contained only SEC filings through Q3 of last year? Sorry Pal, wrong again!

    A flower is made up of many of these, one would be a .....

    ReplyDelete
  57. Techguess

    again I have to disagree with that by definition thing. Painting indicators is not strange to us the public and professional. Because that's what it is just a dot in a x & y axle.
    Again an example stocktiger.com sends out break out alerts that really can be traded profitable. The same guy sends out pre-break out alerts to all those with enough charting knowledge, also profitable. And so forth. There are so many algorithms at work that any sustainable method with fantastic results would be traded to death.

    Anony 2;41

    ReplyDelete
  58. It is being sealed because of gross misconduct detials on the part of several at GS.. That is fact.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Nonsense. Those are GS responses; they would never plead gross misconduct of their employees as a defense. Such a defense is a patent admission of failure and would result in loss of this litigation. Try something believable, there is fertile ground there.

    ReplyDelete
  60. how is cleantech entitled to the fees and costs that greenshift common shareholders have paid for, and, where are the fees and costs that cleantech collected from a bogus defense motion accounted for in the SEC filing ???????






    ReplyDelete
  61. Nobody,
    You mean like you wishing and hoping the website contained only SEC filings through Q3 of last year? Wishing and hoping the dilution number was wrong. Wishing and hoping weren't profitable. Wishing and hoping cargil was infringing. Wishing and hoping they didn't get the new patent 197?

    ReplyDelete
  62. You know what they say about fools that can't admit they're wrong?

    ReplyDelete
  63. no! wondering instead what your little faggot butt-buddy did with the godam MONEY .

    ReplyDelete
  64. GS Cleantech will win this case. Like a lot of cases, there has and will be up's and down's. I've looked at this case and the filings. They will win for sure. I am a patent attorney with 18 years experience. I am investing here. Patrick

    ReplyDelete
  65. Patrick,

    Will you please weigh in on all the delaying tactics available for the defendant and the Appellate Court in DC penchant for over ruling the district court's claim construction. Please also provide a range of times for the district court adjudication, finding of award and penalties and then the timetable for the Appellate Court to run its process. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  66. nobody stfu, stop posting nobody likes u lol

    ReplyDelete
  67. What does "like" have to do with earning money? I'd fire my mother, my wife, and all my children if they were not measuring up to established standards. Your response is absolutely infantile -- "take your ball and bat and go home, nobody likes you". With that level of intelligence exhibited by owners of GERS' stock it is no wonder that legitimate investors stay clear; you are painting our company with your own idiocy.

    ReplyDelete
  68. well,

    is sumpin upp...you fundemental guys know why limbo land has emerged?

    glta longs

    man i want a big gap up on news i can taste it

    ReplyDelete
  69. "I'd fire my mother, my wife, and all my children if they were not measuring up to established standards."

    Just a little look into the mind of who is posting constant, argumentative, condescending comments. Nobody, seek help, it may already be too late!

    ReplyDelete
  70. Probably his wife left him already for not meeting her standards, who wants a guy glued for years on message boards, saying I was right really, really please believe me otherwise you are an idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  71. i confidently with no conflict announce that no dilution has occured today!...is dilution over???..who really knows...for sure no buyers either...sumpin up honey?

    ReplyDelete
  72. 0 Sales for the day and he states with confidence there is no dilution today....Really?!!

    What a tool!!

    ReplyDelete
  73. anony 10;35...humor ass hole...you contribute nutin honey

    ReplyDelete
  74. zero trades...zero dilution....come on slash or skunk....give us the fundemental news....your killin me!

    is it good ..is it real good news...does it smell like victory???

    ReplyDelete
  75. ICM FOLDS UNDER PRESSURE! GERS TURNS NEW FOUND OWNERSHIP OF ICM OVER TO YA GLOBAL IN RETURN FOR DEBT FORGIVENESS, PAID IN FULL!

    Just thinking outloud.....

    ReplyDelete
  76. D-I-L-U-T-I-O-N GOOD BYE

    ReplyDelete
  77. up yours your mothers n your wifes dipchit donkey boy

    ReplyDelete
  78. dont be talkin about somebodys mother, fuker.

    ReplyDelete
  79. nbodys moma is da bestest in the westest

    ReplyDelete
  80. $500 for that punks name and address

    ReplyDelete
  81. 50 cent for nbdys mom

    ReplyDelete
  82. 25 shares for nobodys mama bumma

    ReplyDelete