Tuesday, August 7, 2012

New Patent is Aboard

New '37 Patent has now been added to the litigation! Defendants (all but Adkins) did not even file an objection?!?!?   The patent that may plug the hole in the multi-evaporator infringement dike took to the harness without a wimper. (metaphorrific!)

Well, this is good news.

See Here

SkunK

44 comments:

  1. How dare you state that this is good news, Skunk!

    Come on nobody give it to him!

    nobody12378 said...

    "to sugar coat and pump at others' expense. That's a form of prostitution."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Skunk, you have made my morning!
    Thank you for bringing this news to us!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The disciples are wrong again! They have an absolutely unblemished record of error. Any court ruling in GERS favor is very good for GERS. There is no other way for them to twist that fact. However, to now claim victory and to start counting the money that will make the disciples rich from court awarded damages and penalty is typical disciple premature ejection from the seat of reality.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You guys do realize that each time you even type this guys moniker or mention it, you are just pumping up his self-proclaimed reign of the GERS kingdom. Right? In his mind, there is himself, and there are the diciples, period! (He apparently now is an expert on this "premature ejection" thing.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Skunnk should really block access to Nobody's postings.

    God forbid good news comes out for GERS, and there's Nobody, right there to curb stomp it down.

    No one has posted "this is an automatic win", you friggin idiot.
    We are just happy that something in the litigation is actually going our way.

    But since you're so quick to stomp any postive news down, it seriously makes it so much more evident that you're ambitions for posting on here and everywhere else are pure evil.

    You are not a GERS investor. There is absolutely no way in hell you are a GERS investor. No investor of any stock would INSTANTLY kick down good news.

    You seriously don't want this stock to go up, and you make it so obvious.

    You make my blood boil. The fact that you're allowed to post your b.s. makes me angry.

    ReplyDelete
  6. We won a big battle but not the war yet. It is tough to argue that this decision makesbour case stronger

    ReplyDelete
  7. If they did not object they must of welcomed it of sorts. Is it possiable they know something about it that we don't. Sounds like a set up to me. Skunk?

    ReplyDelete
  8. The disciples prove time and again that they have the reading comprehension of a six year-old. I openly and clearly stated the ruling was good for GERS. They cannot read or see beyond the frustration of their unrequited expectations and their anger over massive losses and heart break over not obtaining quick riches. What makes me angry is the lack of a reading comprehension threshold required before one is allowed to post. Something like those weird spam tests. That would eliminate a lot of the inane and Mongoloid expectorants that they think contribute to this difficult discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'll be honest, after seeing this news, I had a buy order placed.

    And THEN I saw Nobody's post.

    I don't think he's right with his assumptions, but with his panic posts and bid-whacking, he'll probably drive the price down lower. So out of fear of his actions, I canceled my order.

    Of course he can predict it, he's making it happen!

    And they say it's because theres no support. Well yeah, who the hell is going to invest in a company when they know someone has a personal agenda to bring the stock price down?

    No matter how cheap, you don't buy a house where mass murders took place, if you know the murderer is still on the loose.

    Nobody, stop murdering this stock.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I really cannot believe the GERS illiteracy evidenced here:

    "We are just happy that something in the litigation is actually going our way".

    Da, have you heard of the Markman Hearing, do you have any idea what the results were? Do some reading before you start to drool.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "And THEN I saw Nobody's post", which stated that the order was good for GERS. See what I mean about the importance of reading comprehension and the ability to make sound decisions, in investing as well as in life.

    ReplyDelete
  12. PLEASE stop feeding this idiot's ego!

    ReplyDelete
  13. So ignoring anything posted by Nobody...

    What arguments could the defendants have now that the '037 patent has been added?

    As far as I know, that should have closed off the loopholes the defendants were desperately hanging on to.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Pursuit of truth, justice and the American way -- ego? How droll.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm interested in what response the defendants will have in the August 31st delayed response, now that the '37 Patent's been added.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anony 9:16 exactly what I stated hours ago.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No dick, you stated
    "The disciples are wrong again! They have an absolutely unblemished record of error. Any court ruling in GERS favor is very good for GERS. There is no other way for them to twist that fact. However, to now claim victory and to start counting the money that will make the disciples rich from court awarded damages and penalty is typical disciple premature ejection from the seat of reality."

    You said nothing like Anony 9:16 before. Learn to read your own work before criticizing everyone else's reading comprehension.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anony 9:16 was asking an honest question for discussion. Not being a prick like you always are.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The problem here is that people cannot distinguish between factual statements about GERS and the state of mind of the euphorians. Here it is again -- Any court ruling in GERS favor is very good for GERS. G'd how I love to pimp these cadets, they respond like piranha to raw meat.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "nobody12378 said...
    Anony 9:16 exactly what I stated hours ago."

    That is not anywhere near the same as "Any court ruling in GERS favor is very good for GERS."

    Which is, again, nowhere near the same as "As far as I know, that should have closed off the loopholes the defendants were desperately hanging on to."

    I really wish I could ignore you but you're one of those annoying people that will twist around every possible angle to make yourself sound right, even when everything you say is chronicalized and can be shown right back to you!

    God, I am reeeeally not looking forward to the Q2 report, since thats when you said you'll be back to ruin iHub again, like you've done here.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Which of the disciples claimed victory in this thread? Who started counting their money in this thread?

    Who is the culprit that made you lash out in the 3th post of this thread that we are all stupid?

    Is this the post that made you angry? "Skunk, you have made my morning!
    Thank you for bringing this news to us!"
    or is it the one before that?

    Or is it that Skunk wrote "well this is good news"?

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'm very pleased the 037 has been added to the case.

    "The ‘037 Patent, filed on March 15, 2006, enhances the competitive advantage of GreenShift’s licensees by expanding GreenShift’s patent protection."

    I think GERS made a very strong argument and basically dismantled the defenses reasoning for summary judgement. So much so that it knocked them off their feet and they requested a delay. The defense is left speechless, scratching their heads, unsure how to respond. I don't think they saw that coming, and surely they don't know what hit them.

    If there was any doubt left about the substantially free oil argument, the 037 clears it up. The patent claims are for a portion of oil.

    I think it's hilarious ICM jumped on the substantially free oil train, right before it derailed.

    Remember, the only hope the defense had after the Markman ruling was to hang their hat on the substantially free oil argument. That hope is gone. I believe the defense will abandon this argument and ICM looks like fools for going along with it.

    As Skunk pointed out, the 037 also plugs the preheating loophole. The 037 covers the use of evaporators for the use of preheating.

    It's no wonder David Winsness called this patent, "extremely important to our licensees and shareholders"

    “GreenShift has pledged to protect the competitive advantage of its licensees and the additional protection is extremely important to our licensees and shareholders,” said David Winsness, GreenShift’s Chief Technology Officer. “We are very excited by the addition of this patent to our portfolio, and look forward to continued delivery of success-driven services, best-in-class systems, improved profitability, and continued innovations to our licensees.”

    Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$

    ReplyDelete
  23. Wait slash here comes nobody to shoot down your position

    ReplyDelete
  24. Not so; again the euphorians are off base. I agree for the most part with Slash and why I stated what I did this morning long before everyone started "responding" to the news.

    ReplyDelete
  25. POET Gets Final Rejection Letter

    Corn oil extraction patent denied.

    "Applicant's arguments filed March 26, 2012 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive."

    http://portal.uspto.gov/external/PA_PeaiPair/view/BrowsePdfServlet?objectId=H5CIUTI4PXXIFW4&lang=DINO

    POET's failed patent application number is 12/208127

    All claims have been rejected and denied. This is the final rejection letter.

    Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$

    ReplyDelete
  26. Try this link
    http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair

    ReplyDelete
  27. And Voila! Right before your very eyes folks, POET's corn oil extraction patent disappears into thin air!

    Poof! It's gone! It's magic, Voila!

    ReplyDelete
  28. well said slash, can you ban nobody now please

    ReplyDelete
  29. Looks like a lot of folks aren't buying our good news; 2.5 to 1 trades initiated as SELLS compared to BUYS. What might happen if we had bad news?

    ReplyDelete
  30. We HAVE bad news. You!!

    ReplyDelete
  31. nobodys mom got bad news when he was born

    ReplyDelete
  32. looks like you cant read dip chit buys an sells about even today

    ReplyDelete
  33. Not according to the most authoritative source, Quotemedia.com. If you believe IHub, well who is the chit dipper then?

    ReplyDelete
  34. he knows to respond to dip chit thats a plus

    ReplyDelete
  35. quotemedia sucks
    as reliable as a broke clock

    ReplyDelete
  36. Nobody, how much would it take us to buy up the float?

    ReplyDelete
  37. iHub sales vs buys are wrong
    All the short sales sites are wrong
    Level 2 sites reporting MM sales are wrong
    Only the premature ejection oracle is right. I wonder if he's going to run on an independent ticket.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anony 9:34 I doubt it could be done. The float increases every day and the AS is 20 billion shares.

    ReplyDelete
  39. nobodys mom can buy the float with all the money she made hooking on the corner

    ReplyDelete
  40. This is running on poets news?

    ReplyDelete