I am the SkunKhunter. I hunt down SkunK stocks. Those are stocks that have been beat down past any reasonable justification. I try to ride the stock up as market forces eventually right the ship of PPS. A SkunK is not a herd animal. He is a scavenger who knows that arriving before the herd means big profits and clean shoes. This is the journey of the GreenShift Corporation. Updated weekly between COB Friday and Sunday evening. (Disclaimers on Bottom of Site)
Good morning, Accordong to my brothers friend who was right about the settlement victory, US patent 037 will force more settlements. He described it like the last leg of the defense being sawed off and burned. Franky D
The defendents are simply delaying things, waiting until they all convert to the AOS ICM system to claim they are operating under the ICM patent and not the GERS patent.
Question for Skunk. What if patent invalidity opinions have been written finding the 037 patent in question and allow the plants to operate free from treble damages and willful intent, would Greenshift have to bring a whole new round of legal actions against those that are infringing?
Anony 9:08... even if they all convert to ICM's POS.. I mean AOS system, they still need a centrifugal system prior to that process. Any centrifugal system for extracting or seperating corn oil would infringe with GreenShift's patents.
So even if they add on the ICM AOS system, they'll still be infringing, unless they license the centrifugal process with GreenShift's Method 1 system. But at that point, they'd be better off using the Method 2 system also, and produce far higher yield than any of ICM's systems.
This is why the language "substancially oil free" is so important. The ICM AOS takes a slurry with most of the oil still in it, adds ethanol as an emulsion breaker and then separates the oil fraction by settling or mechanical means, "without heating". Ethanol is then flashed off and recovered. The '037' does nothing to stop this.
what is it good for to give your opponent more time to answer? maybe they are negotiating an settlement right now and don't want to spoil it with the judge at all by not answering in time... I can't get another reasonable cause. at this stage of litigation no gifts can be made without reason... more time means more money to be lost.
My guess is 90% or more of the opinions offered on this blog are pretty much worthless when compared to the reality of the situation. Just a guess however.
Anony 3:44- Our opinions are based on what information we have available. To the best of my knowledge, my oppinions are relatively accurate, as they're based on known information.
Of course, there may be unknown information that can change the outcomes of things, but none of that information is public knowledge.
Looking at the patents, reading them for what they say, and comparing that information to the actions of the litigants, we can make pretty accurate assumptions as to what SHOULD happen. But in the end, it comes down to a person (judge) making a decision. If that judge is going on the same information we all have available, than I can assume my opinions are more valuable than simply a guess.
they better win...gers is having trouble finding buyers for the fresh share dilution...if this works out those buyers down here will do way better than the long term R/S common holders
Anony 1:50- I can only assume you're a shorter since you're clearly trying to scare people with a panic post.
I suggest reading up on the SEC's regulations about that and remembering just because you're "anonymous", the internet providers still automatically record IP addresses, computer ID's, and router information specifically to pinpoint computer locations in investigations.
Watch what you post before committing a felony.
All though I don't see GERS going subpenny (even though its close), if it does, it is certainly not "death ahead". Stop trying to scare current and potential investors with your nonsense.
I was thinking the same thing. If there were no talks of settlement or something similar, than it is a disadvantage to the plaintiff to allow a defendant more time to argue their side.
I can't imagine any plaintiff in any case saying "They're illegally infringing our patents, couldn't come up with a good argument in time, but I'd like to hear what they think, so let's give them more time to come up with a convincing argument."
translation of todays price action...less than 10,000 shares trading associated with a nearly 20% price collapse....sys no buyers out there....
no accumulation is the same as distribution in a company printing fresh shares....there is no price support what so ever...you goanna sue me over price volume analysisi?
When we spread the word about GreenShift, basher's and shorters intervene with both multiple posts and multiple accounts/ identities spreading garbage about reverse splits, going private, and endless dilution.
And you can't usually comment back because generally one of the board's moderators is a basher, and will delete anything that goes against what their friends say.
You also can't personally attack anyone no matter how negative they are and how many panic-posts they put out to drop the share price.. you're post will get deleted, while there nonsense stays up for any potential investor to see and get scared away.
I have tried spreading the word. I know many others that have also. If you check boards like iHub very often like I do, you'll see great posts and arguments against bashers, but they get deleted quickly.
The bashers and shorters are the only voices that seem to be heard. You can make up the worst lies about the company and have that post remain for everyone to see. But try defending the company, and for one reason or another, the post will get deleted.
Investor Hangout is the fastest growing stock message board in the World right now for a reason, that nonsense doesn't happen there. Numbers don't lie http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://www.investorshangout.com
That might be a good site, that you obviously work for, but numbers can lie. I use to own a few websites.. for $400 I paid a specialized company to bring my Glboal Alexa score from about 7,000,000 down to around 200,000. And that was only with their $400 plan.
You're demographic is mostly U.S., so it's safe to assume you're site is genuinely popular, but just wanted to mention that numbers can in fact lie. Some businesses specialize in it.
the 37 is death sentence to defendents everybody knows it even vander camp
ReplyDeleteGood morning,
ReplyDeleteAccordong to my brothers friend who was right about the settlement victory, US patent 037 will force more settlements. He described it like the last leg of the defense being sawed off and burned.
Franky D
The defendents are simply delaying things, waiting until they all convert to the AOS ICM system to claim they are operating under the ICM patent and not the GERS patent.
ReplyDeleteQuestion for Skunk. What if patent invalidity opinions have been written finding the 037 patent in question and allow the plants to operate free from treble damages and willful intent, would Greenshift have to bring a whole new round of legal actions against those that are infringing?
ReplyDeleteAnony 9:08... even if they all convert to ICM's POS.. I mean AOS system, they still need a centrifugal system prior to that process. Any centrifugal system for extracting or seperating corn oil would infringe with GreenShift's patents.
ReplyDeleteSo even if they add on the ICM AOS system, they'll still be infringing, unless they license the centrifugal process with GreenShift's Method 1 system. But at that point, they'd be better off using the Method 2 system also, and produce far higher yield than any of ICM's systems.
Icm 1/2# Gs 1-1/3# end of story
ReplyDeleteI don't think ICM patent will stand. It's invalid
ReplyDeleteThis is why the language "substancially oil free" is so important. The ICM AOS takes a slurry with most of the oil still in it, adds ethanol as an emulsion breaker and then separates the oil fraction by settling or mechanical means, "without heating". Ethanol is then flashed off and recovered. The '037' does nothing to stop this.
ReplyDeleteThe ICM patent is obvious.
ReplyDeleteThe AOS does nothing to stop the 037. Years of infringement will BK ICM.
ReplyDeletejimmbody 942
ReplyDeletejimmbody 908 918
ReplyDeletei thought the ethanol was heated, thus heating the emulsion when combined.
ReplyDeletehave to go back and look again ...
looks like heat to me; claims 3 and 9.
ReplyDeletethey concentrate, heat and recover.
this is a greater investment as the share price gets lower....i cannot wait until it goes back to say .01 or even .001 or even .0001
ReplyDeletewe will all be rich..light my cigar
my guess is that adding ethanol brings the moisture % back up to within COES parameters.
ReplyDeletelooks like fuel ethanol is roughly 95% ethanol and 5% water (hmmmm). mix in a solution that has roughly 30% water and what do you get?
ReplyDeleteMoonshine lol
ReplyDeletewhat is it good for to give your opponent more time to answer?
ReplyDeletemaybe they are negotiating an settlement right now and don't want to spoil it with the judge at all by not answering in time...
I can't get another reasonable cause. at this stage of litigation no gifts can be made without reason... more time means more money to be lost.
m2a
My guess is 90% or more of the opinions offered on this blog are pretty much worthless when compared to the reality of the situation. Just a guess however.
ReplyDeleteok, then tell us your truth...
ReplyDeletemake an educated guess...
please.
Anony 3:44- Our opinions are based on what information we have available. To the best of my knowledge, my oppinions are relatively accurate, as they're based on known information.
ReplyDeleteOf course, there may be unknown information that can change the outcomes of things, but none of that information is public knowledge.
Looking at the patents, reading them for what they say, and comparing that information to the actions of the litigants, we can make pretty accurate assumptions as to what SHOULD happen. But in the end, it comes down to a person (judge) making a decision. If that judge is going on the same information we all have available, than I can assume my opinions are more valuable than simply a guess.
Only time will tell.
they better win...gers is having trouble finding buyers for the fresh share dilution...if this works out those buyers down here will do way better than the long term R/S common holders
ReplyDeleteis it still too late to short this?
ReplyDeleteI'm going to say a combination of yes it's too late.. and I sure hope so.
ReplyDeletesub penny....death ahead
ReplyDeleteYour a loser
DeleteStock learner
Anony 1:50- I can only assume you're a shorter since you're clearly trying to scare people with a panic post.
ReplyDeleteI suggest reading up on the SEC's regulations about that and remembering just because you're "anonymous", the internet providers still automatically record IP addresses, computer ID's, and router information specifically to pinpoint computer locations in investigations.
Watch what you post before committing a felony.
All though I don't see GERS going subpenny (even though its close), if it does, it is certainly not "death ahead". Stop trying to scare current and potential investors with your nonsense.
you are nieve...there is no support, what so ever, for the price....you are misleading people into complacency....you are in legal jepardy
ReplyDeleteIf that was the case, GERS would have been subpenny a long time ago. Obviously there's support.
ReplyDeleteis adkins going to settle? why else is Gs giving more time?
ReplyDeleteI was thinking the same thing.
ReplyDeleteIf there were no talks of settlement or something similar, than it is a disadvantage to the plaintiff to allow a defendant more time to argue their side.
I can't imagine any plaintiff in any case saying "They're illegally infringing our patents, couldn't come up with a good argument in time, but I'd like to hear what they think, so let's give them more time to come up with a convincing argument."
That just wouldn't make sense.
I'm liking the possibilities here.
Don't jump the gun fellas.
ReplyDeleteThere is a lot of gamesmanship that goes on with these cases
translation of todays price action...less than 10,000 shares trading associated with a nearly 20% price collapse....sys no buyers out there....
ReplyDeleteno accumulation is the same as distribution in a company printing fresh shares....there is no price support what so ever...you goanna sue me over price volume analysisi?
the question is...will gers stop issuing shares to end the price erosion and hold the .01 price as sacrosaint
ReplyDeleteso is the company done with dilution and now looking for an alternative for surviving the legal time lines...
ReplyDeleteI hope so.. 3:30pm and no "dilution dump" yet.
ReplyDeleteWhy haven't you guys made your presence known on Investors Hangout? Spread the word about GreenShift.
ReplyDeleteWhen we spread the word about GreenShift, basher's and shorters intervene with both multiple posts and multiple accounts/ identities spreading garbage about reverse splits, going private, and endless dilution.
ReplyDeleteAnd you can't usually comment back because generally one of the board's moderators is a basher, and will delete anything that goes against what their friends say.
You also can't personally attack anyone no matter how negative they are and how many panic-posts they put out to drop the share price.. you're post will get deleted, while there nonsense stays up for any potential investor to see and get scared away.
I have tried spreading the word. I know many others that have also. If you check boards like iHub very often like I do, you'll see great posts and arguments against bashers, but they get deleted quickly.
The bashers and shorters are the only voices that seem to be heard.
You can make up the worst lies about the company and have that post remain for everyone to see. But try defending the company, and for one reason or another, the post will get deleted.
It's a shame.
Investor Hangout is the fastest growing stock message board in the World right now for a reason, that nonsense doesn't happen there. Numbers don't lie http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http://www.investorshangout.com
ReplyDeleteThat might be a good site, that you obviously work for, but numbers can lie.
ReplyDeleteI use to own a few websites.. for $400 I paid a specialized company to bring my Glboal Alexa score from about 7,000,000 down to around 200,000. And that was only with their $400 plan.
You're demographic is mostly U.S., so it's safe to assume you're site is genuinely popular, but just wanted to mention that numbers can in fact lie. Some businesses specialize in it.
It's 100% natural and Google Crawls the site three times a day.
ReplyDeleteIt would be nice to see Skunk or Slashnuts become the moderator, especially seeing they'd have complete control of their board there.
Have a great weekend!
Joe
jimmbody 1138 1237 150 741 1244 130 225
ReplyDelete