Here is GreenShift's Reply in Support of an earlier motion.
This caught my eye "Daniel J. Lueders, ¶ 3 (describing himself as “a medical layperson"). Although I was unable to find out exactely what a "medical layperson" was, I found this listed among Mr. Lueders many other talents: advice regarding lawfully designing around patents
He must be very good at what he does, because if you google the part in red above, you will get millions of hits, but Mr. Lueders will come out on top - just below the google ads. I see he is also just above my blog post quote - geepers these Google bots are FAST!
SkunK
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
8 comments:
With all that seems to be good going on with GreenShift you have to wonder why they would want to stay all the proceedings in the litigation for "at least 6 months"? They had what seemed to be a favorable outcome to the marksman hearing. If there case was as strong or cut and dry as GERS advocates make it seem why not move forward and get the case behind us? A 6 month stay in the litigation is sure to mean further dilution and longer road to profitability. Also, in the two days prior to the TA being gagged we had two days where over 500,000 shares were traded. And guess what, when they told the TA they could release the share count again it was around 1 million shares higher than prior to the gag. So... more dilution continues. Not so much dilution that would really matter but with the 4th quarter results coming out soon and people expecting GERS to post a profitable quarter you have to wonder: Why are we still diluting? Why no updates? Why? Anyone?
Why the stay? The stay only relates to one man. That one man has heart problems and his doctor says he cannot participate in a stressful deposition for at least 6 months. It has nothing to do with all the rest of it. GreenShift is not trying to stay the case - just one guy's participation because he physically cannot participate without serious risk to his health.
Seriously, what would you rather have Greenshift do?
Can nobody understand that? I think we do. I'm nobody who are you?
If their profitable now, six months stay means MORE profit. Break from paying lawyers the money go's straight to bottom line. building cash for new lawsuits? Must be why defense so against it. Would be more patents allowed and enough time for infringer final rejections to. The longer the stay an risk of triple damage liabilities goes high.
I think if you can't acknowledge the fact that the request for complete stay in litigation could be seriously detrimental to GERS shareholders you have blinders on.
If its seriously detrimental defense would be all for it not against it.
They are against it because they don't want the guy to die before they can get usable testimony out of him.
Nobody thinks a testimony is more important then a mans life.
Post a Comment