tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post8833208270675327512..comments2023-10-22T08:03:12.472-05:00Comments on GreenShift GERS - the unofficial site: NEC is ON!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger73125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-54548401918809055402013-02-14T23:08:30.642-06:002013-02-14T23:08:30.642-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.Slashnutshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10672183542930969362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-53674039321255006892013-02-14T23:05:25.642-06:002013-02-14T23:05:25.642-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.Slashnutshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10672183542930969362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-50764181311167114772013-02-14T10:12:50.363-06:002013-02-14T10:12:50.363-06:00nob0dy really scared bashing hard last few weeks, ...nob0dy really scared bashing hard last few weeks, even called transfer agent, desperati0n....if 50 cent per p0st dont work wife back to bunny ranch.<br /><br />good luck all<br /><br />$!$!$!$!$!$$$$$$$$$$Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-56756754909261936272013-02-11T18:09:20.703-06:002013-02-11T18:09:20.703-06:00up after hours 930000 buy !up after hours 930000 buy !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-73408343277640438382013-02-11T14:50:29.425-06:002013-02-11T14:50:29.425-06:00ANDE: Oil Extraction Sets Another Record High
GE...ANDE: Oil Extraction Sets Another Record High <br /><br />GERS' 2nd largest customer shipped an all time company record of more than 19,000,000 pounds in Q412. This is 2,500,000 more pounds than Q312. <br /><br />For the full year, ANDE shipped over 59,000,000 pounds of oil. <br /><br />Oil shipped increased by about 375%, compared to 12,482,000 pounds in 2011. <br /><br />http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=96043&p=irol- <br /><br />I think the dollar amount of oil increased roughly $1,000,000 from just 3 months ago... <br /><br />More to come, <br /><br />Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$!$!$! Slashnutsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-62618220248846089272013-02-11T12:12:30.493-06:002013-02-11T12:12:30.493-06:00nobody scared i heard he has to sell for margin ca...nobody scared i heard he has to sell for margin callsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-84761422090905410812013-02-11T11:24:49.746-06:002013-02-11T11:24:49.746-06:00Not the great news on the litigation front, not th...Not the great news on the litigation front, not the just finished NEC, not the outstanding earnings of GPRE nor ANDE are capable of putting humpty dumpty together again (increasing the PPS). What will it take? If you have been reading the notorious nobody you would know.nobody123789https://www.blogger.com/profile/07074242681788870048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-25958502178705173592013-02-11T11:05:10.734-06:002013-02-11T11:05:10.734-06:00The 80% to what you refer is colatral on the loan ...The 80% to what you refer is colatral on the loan to the main borrower. They cannot sell it. They have not sold it. They cannot promise to sell it. In fact the prefered shares have not even been converted to common. The preferred shares can only be converted to common in case of default. No one will borrow serious money without colateral. Start a bank and try it if you think you want to be the first bank in recorded history to do it.<br /><br />KK is an insider so it is impossible to buy or sell without reporting on a form. Look at the insider report that every brokerage carries. Nothing to report.<br /><br />Your BS about 80% is just that BS.<br /><br />You post 10 posts I will post one to correct it. Now go ahead and post your next ten.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-9657772159051728572013-02-11T09:47:22.914-06:002013-02-11T09:47:22.914-06:00They could issue a one time dividend that only ves...They could issue a one time dividend that only vested on the preferred shares if they wished.<br /><br />You never know they might not be that greedy, maybe they would be happy with 80%!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-4085527203624554182013-02-10T09:47:06.908-06:002013-02-10T09:47:06.908-06:00Your implication that KK and the inner circle can ...Your implication that KK and the inner circle can do anything that they want is far fetched. They do have tremendous latitude and certainly more than a public corporation with a true governance structure. That said, there are limits. For example, if there was a settlement and they used this money for lavish bonuses and did not pay-off the debt and continued to dilute to make expenses this would be a violation of their fiduciary responsibilities defined by the SEC and in law. There are some limits.<br /><br />http://smallbusiness.chron.com/legal-relationship-between-shareholders-ceos-33637.htmlnobody123789https://www.blogger.com/profile/07074242681788870048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-82827697796862686962013-02-10T07:02:49.428-06:002013-02-10T07:02:49.428-06:00KK is young and has plenty of time to get to the N...KK is young and has plenty of time to get to the NASDAQ. His, EC, DW, etc. first intention is to get rich and have annuity in royalties.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-80089090181498973592013-02-10T06:22:00.899-06:002013-02-10T06:22:00.899-06:00There is one significant proviso to this thesis th...There is one significant proviso to this thesis that GERS' common shareholders have no leverage with the company, either in terms of the PPS of their stock or market cap of the company. Indirectly we do. It is well known that KK desires greatly to become a CEO of a NASDAQ listed company. He simply cannot accomplish that goal of a lifetime without significantly improving the basic fiscal condition of the company and this includes the PPS and market cap of the common stock, and has NOTHING to do with the value of the preferred shares and the dividends that they afford the inner circle -- NOTHING. Read the requirements for a public company to be listed on the NASDAQ.nobody123789https://www.blogger.com/profile/07074242681788870048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-76722594385765520462013-02-09T09:01:36.870-06:002013-02-09T09:01:36.870-06:00Everyone, lets leave Nobody alone and not interact...Everyone, lets leave Nobody alone and not interact with him as well. He's clearly panicking here and I am starting to feel bad that his day is coming very soon. He's working overtime...bigtime. <br /><br />So, let him crap and just ignore him.<br /><br />Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-23538555055850328622013-02-09T08:28:34.664-06:002013-02-09T08:28:34.664-06:00British form of the word.British form of the word.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-57619649466637788612013-02-08T23:13:15.468-06:002013-02-08T23:13:15.468-06:00^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^I STOPPED READING AFTER YOU MI...^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^I STOPPED READING AFTER YOU MISSPELLED "INVESTERS"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-40895982540270624472013-02-08T20:52:31.438-06:002013-02-08T20:52:31.438-06:00I am saying they do not care about investers. Thi...I am saying they do not care about investers. This is wall street financing at its best. I am investing for the very-very-very long-term if they do in the future make enough money and have the desire to grow or build another company, they will need to show shareholder return on this company. Venture investers will tell you if they have a ten percent success rate on cash return investments, they have had a good day. Because they lost money on the 90 percent, but the 10 percent that hit gained them ten fold what they lost on the 90 percent losers. This is is a judgement call on technology, the courts, and management intentions because the common shareholder does not have a vote in any business relations or dividend distributions. Dividend structure is set up so the prferred stock holders get their's first. and the common stock holder is working with only 20% of the approved stock with 80 percent going to a few in cohorts with each other. So only if they want to really make a business with teeth would this show favorability with common stock holders. This is a whipping boy stock being manipulated by few that are given discount debentures at this time and are excersising discount debentures to gain stock, only to turn it around to others at market value. This is typical wall street. Look at the last 10K and notice how Yagi has purchased and filtered out stock to an ever growing number of list of percentage ownership investors. YAGI by contract may only own a 5% total stake, but there is nothing saying YAGI cannot excersize debentures, gain stock at discount and then turn them over to others at profit, only to do it over and over, thus diluting stock and never actually owning over 5%. GERS would stop this unless they were either held by a "smoking gun" or agreed with the practice. If GERS had the cash and wanted to, they could stop this by paying YAGI there interest on the loan agreements.<br /><br />GLTAAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-80612058363882626632013-02-08T20:11:21.742-06:002013-02-08T20:11:21.742-06:00Also are you saying that they do not care about th...Also are you saying that they do not care about their investors?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-69423875318515860252013-02-08T20:09:45.291-06:002013-02-08T20:09:45.291-06:00Gers investor knowing what you know and with the ...Gers investor knowing what you know and with the dilution going on. Why are you an investor here knowing everything you stated at this time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-83646717837705595622013-02-08T19:22:00.232-06:002013-02-08T19:22:00.232-06:00All three acted like white trash. No class!All three acted like white trash. No class!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-31141921642756258612013-02-08T19:17:30.446-06:002013-02-08T19:17:30.446-06:00It is quite interesting to read these posts knowin...It is quite interesting to read these posts knowing what I know. No, there is not any inside information here, but some sound observation and background.<br /><br />GERS is defending patents with real intention of winning. However, GERS is not hanging the hat on a one-time slam and payout. GERS has an interest in gaining royalties from COES to fund further development on green technologies. This is not the last gig for GERS. The intersest is to build a legitimate corporation with a long term growth and future.<br /><br />In the meantime, many GERS employees gave up a substantial salary decrease to keep the company afloat during some lean times and are being reimbursed for those sacrifices with recently gained revenue. Thus profits are low and compensation increases shows an increase for top and bottom management.<br /><br />It may take some dilution of stock beyond ability to pay creditors and use revenue to maintain a highly qualified and trained staff when there are few in the labor pool having the narrow expertise these employees have that have been through the nuts and bolts assembly of developing this new technology.<br /><br />Each ethanol production process has its own fingerprint and it is not a one size fits all opportunity. This is why GERS has been successful in acheiving the yeilds for signees due to the service GERS provides each and every royalty payer. At the beginning of the day, it is what GERS does for their compliant ethanol producers that gain payers results at the end of the day.<br /><br />Another reason you will not see huge net earnings with GERS is because they are long term as I suggest most investors here are. Revenue is being spent on additional forward thinking green technology that could become the next "COES" type technology.<br /><br />But never trust the courts. This company is well directed technically by DW, financially managed by EC, and held in place by KK. Overseers such as RK and GB contain exuberant variations to the company goals.<br /><br />For those wanting a quick grand slam on a law suit ruling, be wary. There is nothing in the corporate constitution that says GERS need pay you anything at all. Ownership decisions of the company is well contained within a small group beyond shareholder control. And for the novice invester, let there be a lesson here. Corporate governance trumps minority stock ownership of which all us ourside investers are. <br /><br />Skunk is more right than wrong, but more wrong than right at times.<br /><br />He does deserve recognition for what he says and derrogatory comments on this site against ant individual input is meaningless. It only shows your frustration and if you are not mature enough to handle it, please just do not result to text on this site. It goes nowhere and that might just frustrate yoy more into a self deficating situation.<br /><br />GLTA I am a GERS invester.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-83459142289338795362013-02-08T15:58:34.662-06:002013-02-08T15:58:34.662-06:00NOBODY wife still working at the crazy whorse, he ...NOBODY wife still working at the crazy whorse, he didnot let he leave early...she was pissed and bought him a trading book for dummys Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-82937411610781292582013-02-08T15:12:02.351-06:002013-02-08T15:12:02.351-06:00i spoke to the constant gloom and doom posters. no...i spoke to the constant gloom and doom posters. not the winners ahead and i apologize for any "woe is me" miss-conception.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-40801526256053151072013-02-08T15:00:41.450-06:002013-02-08T15:00:41.450-06:00Results for the Fourth Quarter of 2012
• Net inco...Results for the Fourth Quarter of 2012 <br />• Net income of $33.0 million, or $0.94 per diluted share <br />• Net income of $6.7 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, excluding the gain on the sale of agribusiness assets <br /><br />Results for the Full Year of 2012 <br />• Net income of $11.8 million, or $0.39 per diluted share <br /><br /><br />http://finance.yahoo.com/news/green-plains-reports-fourth-quarter-214125446.html <br /><br />Corn Oil Production Segment <br /><br />Revenues in the corn oil production segment decreased by $0.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. During the three months ended December 31, 2012, Green Plains sold 36.6 million pounds of corn oil compared to 31.9 million pounds in the same period in 2011. The increase in volume was offset by a 13.5% decrease in average price for the three months ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. Average corn oil yield increased to 0.61 pounds per bushel for the three months ended December 31, 2012 compared to 0.50 pounds per bushel in the same period in 2011 primarily due to process improvements. <br /><br /><br />Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$<br /><br />Slashnutsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-17184394995751340312013-02-08T14:42:52.687-06:002013-02-08T14:42:52.687-06:00GPRE Beats On Revenues/Smashes Expectations On EPS...GPRE Beats On Revenues/Smashes Expectations On EPS!<br /><br />GERS' #1 customer destroys estimates... <br /><br />http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/02/06/green-plains-renewable-energy-outruns-estimates-a.aspx <br /><br /><br />Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$ Slashnutsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5693231676491808791.post-11587885901409211382013-02-08T14:20:32.491-06:002013-02-08T14:20:32.491-06:00To use the old phrase made contemporary again by J...To use the old phrase made contemporary again by Joe Biden: The API is full of malarkey. <br /><br /><br />The API guys stated, yet again, that the EPA prematurely approved the use of E15 in vehicles manufactured since 2001. API says that there hasn’t been sufficient study. They conveniently ignore the fact that alcohol/ethanol has been used in vehicle engines since the mid-1850’s; that virtually every independent study of gasoline vs. ethanol shows ethanol is the superior engine fuel; and that even the automobile industry’s top scientists (including the General Motors guys who invented leaded gasoline) believed that ethanol is the better fuel. They also ignore the fact that there are other countries on this planet that have relied on ethanol and various ethanol-gasoline blends for years, with no problems other than those that are customarily experienced by internal combustion engines. <br /><br /><br />In addition, they gloss over the fact that the government’s testing laboratories didn’t just take up the study of ethanol as an engine fuel in the past couple of years; they have studied ethanol and different blend levels for many, many years. Moreover, Ricardo Laboratories– the world’s leading and most respected private lab dealing with fuel issues – did its own study that shows that E15 can be used in all vehicles going back to the early 1990’s. <br /><br /><br />They have also mischaracterized, again, the EPA’s E15 waiver; making it sound like it wasn’t just a recommendation, but that it is a mandated imperial order. They referred to a recent AAA warning about E15 causing engine damage as if AAA conducted their own conclusive testing of the fuel. But AAA didn’t, they relied on the lies given to them by the oil lobby and then invented some of their own gross exaggerations to make the warning seem more urgent. It’s just more malarkey; hot stinky grotesque batches of malarkey. <br /><br /><br />But perhaps the single stupidest misstatement that the two presenters made today is when they characterized ethanol as being dangerously corrosive. Let me remind everyone that ethanol is alcohol. Alcohol can be consumed; it can be rubbed on your body; it is used to clean and disinfect sensitive medical instruments that are used on internal organs of the human body; and you can leave an open container of alcohol in a closed room without killing any people who may be in the room. Try doing these things with gasoline. And, if you only use gasoline and you experience water related problems such as freezing, you add alcohol to the gasoline to solve the problem. In my estimation, if there is something that’s bad in ethanol, it’s the gasoline that's added to the alcohol to denaturize it. <br /><br /><br />Even if ethanol caused some or all of the engine problems that the oil industry pretend that it does, the solution is not to not use ethanol. The solution is to ban the use of gasoline as an engine fuel and to mandate that all engine components be manufactured with regard to alcohol use. And of course, the ethanol should be produced in America by Americans. Simply put, I’d much rather have my fuel money go to American farmers than foreign terrorists. <br /><br /><br />http://americancoalitionforethanol.createsend1.com/t/ViewEmail/t/0E5A1ACD22AEE663/7299D94113C2FF712540EF23F30FEDED <br /><br />Good Luck To All!$!$!$!$Slashnutsnoreply@blogger.com